Citation Analysis

Estimation and Inference in Boundary Discontinuity Designs: Location-Based Methods\\ Supplemental Appendix\bigskip
Matias D. Cattaneo, Rocio Titiunik, Ruiqi Rae Yu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05670
29
Citation mentions
11
Cited references
7
Sections
7,371
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 van der Vaart 1996 8 5 16.0 0.276 1.000 100%
2 Cattaneo, Matias D. and Yu, Ruiqi (Rae) (self) 2025 6 5 11.0 0.207 0.941 83%
3 Chernozhukov, Victor and Chetverikov, Denis and Ka... 2014 4 4 8.0 0.138 0.928 100%
4 Dudley, Richard M 2014 2 2 4.0 0.069 0.644 100%
5 Cattaneo, Matias D. and Chandak, Rajita and Jansso... (self) 2024 2 1 4.0 0.069 0.511 100%
6 Chernozhukov, Victor and Chetverikov, Denis and Ka... 2014 2 1 4.0 0.069 0.511 100%
7 Gine 2016 1 1 2.0 0.034 0.406 100%
8 Simon, Leon and others 1984 1 1 2.0 0.034 0.406 100%
9 Federer, Herbert 2014 1 1 2.0 0.034 0.406 100%
10 Folland, G.B. 2002 1 1 2.0 0.034 0.406 100%
11 Chernozhuokov, Victor and Chetverikov, Denis and K... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.034 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.