← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

%\rule\textwidth
Matteo Barigozzi, Claudio Lissona, Matteo Luciani
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05536
192
Citation mentions
97
Cited references
20
Sections
4,137
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Barigozzi, M. and M. Luciani (self) 2023 6 4 8.0 0.031 0.874 67%
2 Morley, J., D. Rodríguez-Palenzuela, Y. Sun, and B... 2023 8 6 9.5 0.042 0.855 62%
3 Ciccarelli, M. and C. Osbat 2017 3 3 4.0 0.016 0.843 100%
4 Corsello, F., S. Neri, and A. Tagliabracci 2021 3 3 4.0 0.016 0.843 100%
5 Ascari, G., P. Bonomolo, M. Hoeberichts, and R. Tr... 2023 3 3 4.0 0.016 0.843 100%
6 Giannone, D. and G. Primiceri 2024 3 3 4.0 0.016 0.843 100%
7 Bergholt, D., F. Canova, F. Furlanetto, N. Maffei-... 2025 3 3 4.0 0.016 0.843 100%
8 Canova, F 2025 4 3 4.5 0.021 0.843 75%
9 Stock, J. H. and M. W. Watson 2025 5 4 7.0 0.026 0.843 60%
10 Cette, G., J. Fernald, and B. Mojon 2016 6 3 6.5 0.031 0.794 50%
11 Ba\'nbura, M. and E. Bobeica 2023 3 2 5.0 0.016 0.737 100%
12 Bianchi, F., G. Nicolo, and D. Song 2023 3 2 4.0 0.016 0.737 100%
13 Barigozzi, M. and M. Luciani (self) 2024 3 2 5.0 0.016 0.737 100%
14 Hamilton, J. D 2018 4 3 4.0 0.021 0.737 50%
15 Phillips, P. C. and Z. Shi 2021 3 3 3.5 0.016 0.737 67%
16 Bai, J. and S. Ng 2004 4 3 5.0 0.021 0.737 50%
17 Barigozzi, M., M. Lippi, and M. Luciani (self) 2021 8 6 8.5 0.042 0.721 38%
18 Morley, J., T. D. Tran, and B. Wong 2024 6 3 6.0 0.031 0.693 33%
19 Lenza, M. and G. E. Primiceri 2022 13 6 12.5 0.068 0.675 31%
20 Jaroci\'nski, M. and M. Lenza 2018 3 2 2.5 0.016 0.644 67%
21 Stock, J. H. and M. W. Watson 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
22 Ng, S 2021 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
23 Kim, C.-J. and J. Kim 2022 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
24 Thum-Thysen, A., F. Blondeau, F. d’Auria, B. Dohri... 2022 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
25 Doz, C., D. Giannone, and L. Reichlin 2012 3 3 2.0 0.016 0.585 33%
26 Del Negro, M., D. Giannone, M. P. Giannoni, and A.... 2017 3 3 3.0 0.016 0.585 33%
27 Diebold, F. X. and R. S. Mariano 1995 3 1 6.0 0.016 0.585 100%
28 Ng, S 2018 2 2 1.5 0.010 0.511 50%
29 McCracken, M. W. and S. Ng 2016 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
30 McCracken, M. and S. Ng 2020 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
31 Del Negro, M., F. Schorfheide, F. Smets, and R. Wo... 2007 3 2 3.0 0.016 0.511 33%
32 Lippi, M. and L. Reichlin 1994 2 2 2.5 0.010 0.511 50%
33 Ahn, H. J. and M. Luciani (self) 2025 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
34 Christiano, L. J. and T. J. Fitzgerald 2003 2 2 2.5 0.010 0.511 50%
35 European Commission 2018 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
36 Buncic, D., A. Pagan, and T. Robinson 2023 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
37 Havik, K., K. Mc Morrow, F. Orlandi, C. Planas, R.... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
38 De Masi, P 1997 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
39 Justiniano, A., G. Primiceri, and A. Tambalotti 2013 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
40 Burlon, L. and P. D’Imperio 2020 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
41 Furlanetto, F., P. Gelain, and M. T. Sanjani 2021 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
42 Morley, J., C. R. Nelson, and E. Zivot 2003 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
43 Kamber, G., J. Morley, and B. Wong 2018 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
44 Phillips, P. C. and S. Jin 2021 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
45 Hartl, T., R. Tschernig, and E. Weber 2022 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
46 Gonzalez-Astudillo, M 2019 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
47 Tóth, M 2021 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
48 Hasenzagl, T., F. Pellegrino, L. Reichlin, and G. ... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
49 Aastveit, K. A. and T. Trovik 2014 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
50 Morley, J. and B. Wong 2020 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
51 \.Ipek, M. S. and B. Kısacıko\uglu 2025 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
52 Boivin, J. and S. Ng 2006 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
53 Luciani, M (self) 2014 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
54 Carriero, A., T. E. Clark, M. Marcellino, and E. M... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
55 Bai, J. and S. Ng 2002 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
56 Hallin, M. and R. Liška 2007 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
57 Alessi, L., M. Barigozzi, and M. Capasso (self) 2010 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
58 Avarucci, M., M. Cavicchioli, M. Forni, and P. Zaf... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
59 Escribano, A. and D. Pena 1994 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
60 Stock, J. H. and M. W. Watson 1988 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
61 Aruoba, S. B., F. X. Diebold, J. Nalewaik, F. Scho... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
62 Onatski, A. and C. Wang 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
63 Elfsbacka Schmoller, M. and M. Spitzer 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
64 Blanchard, O. J. and D. Quah 1989 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
65 Forni, M., L. Gambetti, A. Granese, L. Sala, and S... 2025 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
66 Benati, L. and T. A. Lubik 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
67 Furlanetto, F., A. Lepetit, O. Robstad, J. Rubio-R... 2025 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
68 Kiley, M. T 2013 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
69 Berson, C., V. Botelho, A. D. Da Silva, C. Foroni,... 2025 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
70 Ba\'nbura, M., D. Giannone, and M. Lenza 2015 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
71 Crump, R. K., S. Eusepi, D. Giannone, E. Qian, and... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
72 Conti, A. M 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
73 Lane, P. R 2024 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
74 Hasenzagl, T., F. Pellegrino, L. Reichlin, and G. ... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
75 Borio, C., P. Disyatat, and M. Juselius 2017 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
76 Berger, T., J. Richter, and B. Wong 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
77 Claessens, S., M. A. Kose, and M. E. Terrones 2012 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
78 Rünstler, G. and M. Vlekke 2018 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
79 Winter, J. d., S. J. Koopman, and I. Hindrayanto 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
80 Mian, A., A. Sufi, and E. Verner 2017 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
81 Mian, A. and A. Sufi 2018 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
82 Plagborg-M\oller, M., L. Reichlin, G. Ricco, and T... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
83 Reichlin, L., G. Ricco, and T. Hasenzagl 2020 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
84 Gambetti, L. and A. Musso 2017 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
85 2 2 1.0 0.010 0.139 0%
86 2 1 1.0 0.010 0.110 0%
87 2 1 1.0 0.010 0.110 0%
88 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
89 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
90 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
91 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
92 Bai, J 2004 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
93 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
94 Borio, C 2014 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
95 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
96 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
97 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.