Citation Analysis

\bf Causal Inference in Counterbalanced Within-Subjects Designs
Justin Ho, Jonathan Min
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03937
34
Citation mentions
23
Cited references
6
Sections
6,777
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Clifford, Scott and Sheagley, Geoffrey and Piston,... 2021 6 3 11.0 0.176 1.000 100%
2 Maxwell, Scott E and Delaney, Harold D and Kelley,... 2017 4 2 5.0 0.118 0.811 100%
3 Michael G. Kenward and Byron Jones 2007 2 2 3.0 0.059 0.644 100%
4 Jacqueline N. Lane and Léonard Boussioux and Charl... 2024 2 1 2.0 0.059 0.511 100%
5 Holland, Paul W 1986 2 1 4.0 0.059 0.511 100%
6 McElreath, Richard 2018 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
7 Keren, Gideon 2014 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
8 Sarkies, Mitchell N. and Skinner, Elizabeth H. and... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
9 Erlebacher, Albert 1977 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
10 Bo Zhang and Jing Guo and Hui Zhang 2022 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
11 Sibbald, Bonnie and Roberts, Chris 1998 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
12 Jns Matthews 1994 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
13 Gary Charness and Uri Gneezy and Michael A. Kuhn 2012 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
14 Whitehead, John and Desai, Yasin and Jaki, Thomas 2020 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
15 Zhou, Quan and Ernst, Philip A and Morgan, Kari Lo... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
16 Tamura, Roy N and Huang, Xiaohong and Boos, Dennis... 2011 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
17 Imai, Kosuke and Tingley, Dustin and Yamamoto, Tep... 2013 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
18 Imai, Kosuke and Keele, Luke and Tingley, Dustin 2010 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
19 Egami, Naoki and Imai, Kosuke 2019 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
20 Gilens, Martin 2001 1 1 2.0 0.029 0.406 100%
21 Almirall, Daniel and Nahum-Shani, Inbal and Sherwo... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.029 0.406 100%
22 Peng Ding and Luke W. Miratrix 2015 1 1 2.0 0.029 0.406 100%
23 Cinelli, Carlos and Forney, Andrew and Pearl, Jude... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.029 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.