← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Inference with few treated units
Luis Alvarez, Bruno Ferman, Kaspar Wüthrich
https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19841
331
Citation mentions
134
Cited references
9
Sections
19,085
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Abadie, Alberto and Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido... 2020 5 3 8.0 0.015 1.000 100%
2 Jonathan Roth and Pedro H.C. Sant’Anna and Alyssa ... 2023 6 6 11.0 0.018 1.000 100%
3 Ferman, Bruno and Pinto, Cristine (self) 2019 13 4 26.0 0.039 1.000 100%
4 Victor Chernozhukov and Kaspar Wuthrich and Yinchu... 2021 6 3 12.0 0.018 1.000 100%
5 Bruno Ferman (self) 2021 6 3 12.0 0.018 1.000 100%
6 Leung, Michael P. 2022 7 3 12.5 0.021 0.950 86%
7 Ibragimov, Rustam and Müller, Ulrich K. 2016 11 3 19.0 0.033 0.935 82%
8 Matias D. Cattaneo and Yingjie Feng and Rocio Titi... 2021 4 3 8.0 0.012 0.928 100%
9 Silvia Goncalves and Serena Ng 2024 5 2 10.0 0.015 0.874 100%
10 Andreas Hagemann 2023 5 2 10.0 0.015 0.874 100%
11 Alvarez (self) 5 2 10.0 0.015 0.874 100%
12 Victor Chernozhukov and Kaspar Wuthrich and Yinchu... 2024 7 2 14.0 0.021 0.874 100%
13 Abadie, Alberto 2021 3 3 5.0 0.009 0.843 100%
14 de Chaisemartin, Cl\'e 2022 3 3 5.0 0.009 0.843 100%
15 Timothy G. Conley and Christopher R. Taber 2011 35 9 49.0 0.106 0.843 60%
16 Arkhangelsky, Dmitry and Athey, Susan and Hirshber... 2021 3 3 6.0 0.009 0.843 100%
17 James G. MacKinnon and Matthew D. Webb 2020 7 5 9.5 0.021 0.830 57%
18 Canay, Ivan A. and Romano, Joseph P. and Shaikh, A... 2017 11 5 14.5 0.033 0.817 55%
19 Jerzy Splawa-Neyman and D. M. Dabrowska and T. P. ... 1990 4 2 8.0 0.012 0.811 100%
20 James G. MacKinnon and Morten Ørregaard Nielsen an... 2023 3 2 5.0 0.009 0.737 100%
21 MacKinnon, James G. and Webb, Matthew D. 2018 3 2 6.0 0.009 0.737 100%
22 Janssen, Arnold 1997 3 3 4.5 0.009 0.737 67%
23 Luis Alvarez and Bruno Ferman (self) 2024 3 2 6.0 0.009 0.737 100%
24 Ricardo Masini and Marcelo C. Medeiros 2021 3 2 6.0 0.009 0.737 100%
25 Ricardo Masini and Marcelo C. Medeiros 2022 3 2 6.0 0.009 0.737 100%
26 Hansen, Bruce E. 2025 3 3 4.5 0.009 0.737 67%
27 Rambachan 3 2 6.0 0.009 0.737 100%
28 Canay, Ivan A. and Santos, Andres and Shaikh, Azee... 2021 9 6 8.0 0.027 0.693 33%
29 Young, Alwyn 2016 2 2 3.0 0.006 0.644 100%
30 Young, Alwyn 2018 2 2 3.0 0.006 0.644 100%
31 Abadie, Alberto and Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido... 2022 2 2 3.0 0.006 0.644 100%
32 Colin A. Cameron and Douglas L. Miller 2015 2 2 3.0 0.006 0.644 100%
33 Federico A. Bugni and Ivan A. Canay and Azeem M. S... 2018 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
34 A. Colin Cameron and Jonah B. Gelbach and Douglas ... 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
35 Pötscher, Benedikt M. and Preinerstorfer, David 2023 3 2 4.5 0.009 0.644 67%
36 James G MacKinnon and Halbert White 1985 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
37 Imbens, Guido W. and Kolesár, Michal 2016 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
38 Kathleen T. Li 2020 4 1 8.0 0.012 0.644 100%
39 Imbens, Guido W. and Rubin, Donald B. 2015 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
40 Adão, Rodrigo and Kolesár, Michal and Morales, Edu... 2019 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
41 Luis Alvarez and Bruno Ferman and Raoni Oliveira (self) 2022 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
42 Yong Cai and Ivan A. Canay and Deborah Kim and Aze... 2023 3 1 6.0 0.009 0.585 100%
43 C. Alan Bester and Timothy G. Conley and Christian... 2011 10 3 8.0 0.030 0.585 20%
44 Lehmann, Erich L. and Romano, Joseph P. 2005 3 3 3.0 0.009 0.585 33%
45 Kathleen T. Li and David R. Bell 2017 3 1 6.0 0.009 0.585 100%
46 Carlos Carvalho and Ricardo Masini and Marcelo C. ... 2018 3 1 6.0 0.009 0.585 100%
47 Paul R. Rosenbaum 2002 3 1 6.0 0.009 0.585 100%
48 Cl\ement de Chaisemartin 2025 2 2 1.5 0.006 0.511 50%
49 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
50 MacKinnon, James G. and Webb, Matthew D. 2017 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
51 Matias D. Cattaneo and Yingjie Feng and Filippo Pa... 2023 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
52 Cyrus J. DiCiccio and Thomas J. DiCiccio and Josep... 2020 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
53 Kyungchul Song 2018 2 2 2.5 0.006 0.511 50%
54 Rustam Ibragimov and Ulrich K. Müller 2010 3 2 3.0 0.009 0.511 33%
55 Hansen, Bruce E 2024 2 2 2.5 0.006 0.511 50%
56 Cyrus J. DiCiccio and Joseph P. Romano 2017 2 2 2.5 0.006 0.511 50%
57 Fisher, R. A. 1992 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
58 Chesher, Andrew and Jewitt, Ian 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
59 Carter, Andrew V. and Schnepel, Kevin T. and Steig... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
60 MacKinnon, J. G. and Nielsen, M. \O. 2023 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
61 Carl-Erik Särndal and Ib Thomsen and Jan M. Hoem a... 1978 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
62 Andrew Baker and Brantly Callaway and Scott Cunnin... 2025 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
63 Pang, Xun and Liu, Licheng and Xu, Yiqing 2022 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
64 Eli Ben-Michael and David Arbour and Avi Feller an... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
65 Martinez,Ignacio and Vives-i-Bastida, Jaume 2024 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
66 Dmitry Arkhangelsky and Guido Imbens 2024 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
67 Ferman (self) 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
68 Trygve Haavelmo 1944 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
69 Heckman, James J and Vytlacil, Edward 2000 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
70 Heckman, James J 2005 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
71 Herna 2010 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
72 Abadie, Alberto and Diamond, Alexis and Hainmuelle... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
73 Bruno Ferman (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
74 Manski, Charles F. and Pepper, John V. 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
75 Rambachan, Ashesh and Roth, Jonathan 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
76 Imbens, Guido W. and Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2009 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
77 Guido W. Imbens 2015 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
78 Gobillon, Laurent and Magnac, Thierry 2016 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
79 Xu, Yiqing 2017 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
80 Muhammad Amjad and Devavrat Shah and Dennis Shen 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
81 Susan Athey and Mohsen Bayati and Nikolay Doudchen... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
82 Luis Alvarez and Bruno Ferman (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
83 Luis Alvarez and Bruno Ferman (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
84 Stephen G. Donald and Kevin Lang 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
85 Hahn, Jinyong and Shi, Ruoyao 2017 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
86 D. W. K. Andrews 2003 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
87 Hoeffding, Wassily 1952 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
88 Joseph P. Romano 1990 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
89 Jianqing Fan and Ricardo Masini and Marcelo C. Med... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
90 EunYi Chung and Mauricio Olivares 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
91 Jing Lei and James Robins and Larry Wasserman 2013 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
92 Brockwell, Peter J. and Davis, Richard A. 1991 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
93 Chun Pong Lau 2025 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
94 Bakirov, N. K. 1998 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
95 Bloom, Nicholas and Eifert, Benn and Mahajan, Apra... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
96 Benedikt M. Pötscher and David Preinerstorfer 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
97 David Preinerstorfer 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
98 Hagemann, Andreas 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
99 EunYi Chung and Joseph P. Romano 2013 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
100 Marinho Bertanha and Eunyi Chung 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
101 D’Haultfœuille, Xavier and Tuvaandorj, Purevdorj 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
102 Clement de Chaisemartin 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
103 Cribari‐Neto, Francisco and Ferrari, Silvia L. P. ... 2000 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
104 Francisco Cribari-Neto 2004 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
105 Francisco Cribari-Neto, Tatiene C. Souza and Klaus... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
106 B. L. Welch 1951 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
107 Bell, Robert M and McCaffrey, Daniel F 2002 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
108 Antoine A. Djogbenou and James G. MacKinnon and Mo... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
109 Kathleen T. Li and Garrett P. Sonnier 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
110 Whitney K. Newey and Kenneth D. West 1987 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
111 Thomas Barrios and Rebecca Diamond and Guido W. Im... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
112 Susan Athey and Guido W. Imbens 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
113 Roth, Jonathan and Sant’Anna, Pedro H. C. 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
114 Fisher, Ronald A 1935 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
115 Alberto Abadie and Alexis Diamond and Jens Hainmue... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
116 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
117 Lihua Lei and Timothy Sudijono 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
118 Azeem M. Shaikh and Panos Toulis 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
119 Roger L. Berger and Dennis D. Boos 1994 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
120 Paul R. Rosenbaum 1996 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
121 Guido W. Imbens and Paul R. Rosenbaum 2005 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
122 Matias D. Cattaneo and Brigham R. Frandsen and Roc... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
123 Cattaneo, Matias D. and Titiunik, Rocío and Vazque... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
124 Borusyak, Kirill and Hull, Peter 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
125 Jason Wu and Peng Ding 2020 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
126 Alwyn Young 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
127 Jonathan Hennessy and Tirthankar Dasgupta and Luke... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
128 Diana Mutz and Robin Pemantle and Philip Pham 2019 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
129 Per Johansson and Mattias Nordin 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
130 Xiaohong Chen 2007 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
131 Whitney K. Newey and Daniel McFadden 1994 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
132 Gallant, A. Ronald 1987 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
133 Whitney K. Newey and James L. Powell 2003 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
134 E. L. Lehmann and C. Stein 1949 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.