Citation Analysis

Common Functional Decompositions Can Mis-attribute Differences in Outcomes Between Populations
Manuel Quintero, William T. Stephenson, Advik Shreekumar, Tamara Broderick
https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16864

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

6,653

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	4	3	7.0	0.093	0.928	100%
2	3	3	5.0	0.070	0.843	100%
3	3	3	5.0	0.070	0.843	100%
4	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
5	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
6	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
7	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
8	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
9	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
10	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
11	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
12	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
13	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
14	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
15	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
16	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
17	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
18	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
19	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
20	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
21	1	1	2.0	0.023	0.406	100%
22	1	1	2.0	0.023	0.406	100%
23	2	2	1.0	0.047	0.139	0%
24	2	2	1.0	0.047	0.139	0%
25	3	1	1.5	0.070	0.126	0%
26	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.087	0%
27	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.087	0%
28	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.087	0%
29	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.087	0%
30	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.087	0%
31	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.087	0%
32	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.087	0%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.