← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Evaluating Meta-Regression Techniques: A Simulation Study on Heterogeneity in Location and Time
Ali Habibnia, Jonathan Gendron
https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16696
308
Citation mentions
116
Cited references
17
Sections
15,448
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 McGrath, Sean and Zhao, XiaoFei and Qin, Zhi Zhen ... 2019 6 5 9.5 0.019 1.000 100%
2 Bakbergenuly, Ilyas and Kulinskaya, Elena 2018 5 4 6.0 0.016 1.000 100%
3 Gambarota, Filippo and Altoè, Gianmarco 2024 9 8 15.5 0.029 1.000 100%
4 Sugasawa, Shonosuke and Noma, Hisashi 2021 5 4 7.5 0.016 1.000 100%
5 Richardson, David B and Cole, Stephen R and Ross, ... 2021 9 5 17.0 0.029 1.000 100%
6 Pateras, Konstantinos and Nikolakopoulos, Stavros ... 2018 12 6 23.0 0.039 1.000 100%
7 Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2010 16 10 29.5 0.052 1.000 100%
8 Baltagi, Badi H. 2005 10 8 17.5 0.032 1.000 100%
9 Viechtbauer, Wolfgang 2007 5 4 8.5 0.016 1.000 100%
10 Van Aert, Robbie C. M. and Jackson, Dan 2019 5 4 8.5 0.016 1.000 100%
11 Dormann, Christian and Guthier, Christina and Cort... 2020 5 3 8.5 0.016 1.000 100%
12 Pereira, Tiago V. and Patsopoulos, Nikolaos A. and... 2010 6 4 12.0 0.019 1.000 100%
13 Cameron, Adrian Colin and Trivedi, Pravin K. 2005 14 10 28.0 0.045 1.000 100%
14 Spanos, Aris 2019 5 3 10.0 0.016 1.000 100%
15 Blázquez-Rincón, Desirée and Sánchez-Meca, Julio a... 2023 8 6 16.0 0.026 1.000 100%
16 Schwarzer, Guido and Rücker, Gerta and Semaca, Cri... 2024 6 5 12.0 0.019 1.000 100%
17 Langan, Dean and Higgins, Julian P.T. and Jackson,... 2019 5 3 10.0 0.016 1.000 100%
18 Domínguez Islas, Clara and Rice, Kenneth M. 2018 7 5 14.0 0.023 1.000 100%
19 Van Den Akker, Olmo R. and Van Assen, Marcel A.L.M... 2020 4 4 7.0 0.013 0.928 100%
20 Oosterbeek, Hessel and Sloof, Randolph and Van De ... 2004 4 4 5.5 0.013 0.928 100%
21 Clark, Tom S. and Linzer, Drew A. 2015 4 3 5.5 0.013 0.928 100%
22 Field, Andy P. 2001 4 3 8.0 0.013 0.928 100%
23 Noma, Hisashi and Nagashima, Kengo and Furukawa, T... 2020 4 3 8.0 0.013 0.928 100%
24 Cooper, Harris and Patall, Erika A. 2009 3 3 3.5 0.010 0.843 100%
25 Stanley, T.D. and Ioannidis, John P.A. and Maier, ... 2023 3 3 5.0 0.010 0.843 100%
26 Stanley, T. D. and Doucouliagos, Hristos 2017 3 3 5.0 0.010 0.843 100%
27 Thöni, Christian and Volk, Stefan 2021 3 3 5.0 0.010 0.843 100%
28 Engel, Christoph 2011 3 3 5.0 0.010 0.843 100%
29 Hausman, Jerry A. and Taylor, William E. 1981 3 3 3.5 0.010 0.843 100%
30 Mundlak, Yair 1978 3 3 3.5 0.010 0.843 100%
31 Kulinskaya, Elena and Hoaglin, David C. and Bakber... 2021 3 3 6.0 0.010 0.843 100%
32 Bom, Pedro R. D. and Rachinger, Heiko 2020 3 3 6.0 0.010 0.843 100%
33 McGrath, Sean and Katzenschlager, Stephan and Zimm... 2023 3 3 6.0 0.010 0.843 100%
34 Sánchez-Meca, Julio and Marín-Martínez, Fulgencio 2008 4 2 6.5 0.013 0.811 100%
35 Kelley, George A 2012 2 2 1.5 0.006 0.644 100%
36 Yamaguchi, Yusuke and Sakamoto, Wataru and Goto, M... 2014 2 2 3.0 0.006 0.644 100%
37 Borenstein, Michael and Hedges, Larry and Higgins,... 2009 2 2 3.0 0.006 0.644 100%
38 Higgins, Julian P. T. and Thompson, Simon G. and S... 2009 2 2 2.5 0.006 0.644 100%
39 Spanos, Aris 2019 2 2 2.5 0.006 0.644 100%
40 Aimone, Jason and Ball, Sheryl and Dwibedi, Esha a... 2024 2 2 2.5 0.006 0.644 100%
41 Johnson, Noel D. and Mislin, Alexandra A. 2011 2 2 2.5 0.006 0.644 100%
42 Aris Spanos and Anya McGuirk 2001 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
43 Poudyal, Niraj and Spanos, Aris 2022 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
44 Rubio‐Aparicio, María and López‐López, José Antoni... 2018 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
45 Bergtold, Jason S. and Spanos, Aris and Onukwugha,... 2010 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
46 Bohnet, Iris 2007 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
47 Lehmann, E. and Romano, Joseph 2005 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
48 Stock, James H. 2020 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
49 Greene, William 2018 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
50 López‐López, José Antonio and Marín‐Martínez, Fulg... 2014 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
51 Günhan, Burak Kürsad and Röver, Christian and Frie... 2020 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
52 Thom, Howard and López‐López, José A. and Welton, ... 2020 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
53 Lee, Jihyun and Beretvas, S. Natasha 2023 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
54 Little, Roderick and Rubin, Donald 2019 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
55 Buuren, Stef van 2018 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
56 Baraldi, Amanda N. and Enders, Craig K. 2010 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
57 Graham, John W. 2009 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
58 Gneiting, Tilmann 2011 3 1 6.0 0.010 0.585 100%
59 West, Kenneth D. 2006 3 1 6.0 0.010 0.585 100%
60 Overton, Randall C. 1998 2 1 1.0 0.006 0.511 100%
61 LeBlanc, Patrick M. and Banks, David 2022 2 1 1.0 0.006 0.511 100%
62 Seber, George Arthur Frederick and Lee, A. J. 2003 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
63 Buch, Claudia M and Bussiere, Matthieu and Goldber... 2018 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
64 Timmermann, Allan 2006 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
65 Maronna, Ricardo A. and Martin, R. Douglas and Yoh... 2019 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
66 Hyndman, Rob J. and Athanasopoulos, George 2021 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
67 Rice, Kenneth and Higgins, Julian P. T. and Lumley... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
68 Lambert, P.C. and Sutton, A.J. and Abrams, K.R. an... 2002 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
69 Stewart, Lesley A. and Clarke, M. J. 1995 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
70 Brockwell, Sarah E. and Gordon, Ian R. 2001 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
71 Hunter, John E. and Schmidt, Frank L. 2000 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
72 Papadimitropoulou, Katerina and Stijnen, Theo and ... 2019 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
73 Stijnen, Theo and Hamza, Taye H. and Özdemir, Pina... 2010 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
74 Viechtbauer, Wolfgang 2010 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
75 Hedges, Larry V. and Vevea, Jack L. 1998 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
76 Biggerstaff, B. J. and Tweedie, R. L. 1997 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
77 Johnson, Blair T. and Cromley, Ellen K. and Marrou... 2017 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
78 Jiang, Chuanzhi and Li, Sen and Cai, Di and Ye, Ji... 2024 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
79 Liu, Tao and Xiao, Wen 2022 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
80 Ren, Shuyi and Song, Changqing and Ye, Sijing and ... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
81 Rudolph, Cort W. and Costanza, David P. and Wright... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
82 Poom, Leo and Af Wåhlberg, Anders 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
83 Rodriguez, Josue E. and Williams, Donald R. and Bü... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
84 LeBeau, Brandon and Song, Yoon Ah and Liu, Wei Che... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
85 Lee, Cue Hyunkyu and Cook, Seungho and Lee, Ji Sun... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
86 Spanos, Aris and McGuirk, Anya 2002 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
87 Michaelides, Michael and Spanos, Aris 2020 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
88 Hennessy, Emily A. and Johnson, Blair T. 2020 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
89 Lin, Dan-Yu and Sullivan, Patrick F. 2009 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
90 Akaike, H. 1974 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
91 Spanos, Aris 2010 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
92 D'Orazio, Brian 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
93 Spanos, Aris 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
94 Myors, Brett and Murphy, Kevin R. 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
95 Van Aert, Robbie C. M. and Wicherts, Jelte M. 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
96 Jeffrey M. Wooldridge 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
97 Loucks, Daniel P. and Van Beek, Eelco 2017 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
98 Guo, Fei and He, Shi and Lin, Zhitao 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
99 Dao, Binh Thi Thanh and Ta, Tram Dieu Ngoc 2020 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
100 Afesorgbor, Sylvanus Kwaku and Demena, Binyam Afew... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
101 Vesco, Paola and Dasgupta, Shouro and De Cian, Enr... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
102 Wehkamp, Johanna and Koch, Nicolas and Lübbers, Se... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
103 Nelson, Jon P. and Kennedy, Peter E. 2009 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
104 Lane, Tom 2016 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
105 Fromell, Hanna and Nosenzo, Daniele and Owens, Tru... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
106 Abeler, Johannes and Nosenzo, Daniele and Raymond,... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
107 Fiala, Lenka and Suetens, Sigrid 2017 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
108 Mengel, Friederike 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
109 Bilén, David and Dreber, Anna and Johannesson, Mag... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
110 Alm, James and Malézieux, Antoine 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
111 Ferraro, Paul J. and Tracy, J. Dustin 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
112 Matousek, Jindrich and Havranek, Tomas and Irsova,... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
113 Zelmer, Jennifer 2003 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
114 Müller, Andreas Christian and Guido, Sarah 2017 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
115 French, Kenneth R. and Schwert, G.William and Stam... 1987 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
116 Diebold, Francis X. and Lopez, Jose A. 1996 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.