← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Projection Inference for Set-Identified SVARs.
Bulat Gafarov, Matthias Meier, José Luis Montiel Olea
https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14106
100
Citation mentions
45
Cited references
13
Sections
7,501
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Baumeister, Christiane and Hamilton, James D 2015 10 6 17.5 0.100 0.966 90%
2 Kaido, Hiroaki and Molinari, Francesca and Stoye, ... 2019 4 4 6.0 0.040 0.928 100%
3 Lu 2013 5 4 8.5 0.050 0.928 80%
4 Giacomini, Raffaella and Kitagawa, Toru 2021 8 6 9.0 0.080 0.909 75%
5 Uhlig, Harald 2005 16 8 20.5 0.160 0.826 56%
6 Arias, Jonas E and Rubio-Ram\'\i 2018 3 3 4.5 0.030 0.737 67%
7 Moon, Hyungsik Roger and Schorfheide, Frank 2012 2 2 3.0 0.020 0.644 100%
8 Scheffe 1953 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
9 Dufour, Jean-Marie 1990 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
10 Dufour, Jean-Marie and Taamouti, Mohamed 2005 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
11 Dufour, Jean-Marie and Taamouti, Mohamed 2007 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
12 Inoue, Atsushi and Kilian, Lutz 2013 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
13 Inoue, Atsushi and Kilian, Lutz 2016 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
14 Granziera,Eleonora and Moon,Hyungsik R. and Schorf... 2018 2 2 2.5 0.020 0.644 100%
15 Ghosal, Subhashis and Ghosh, Jayanta K and Samanta... 1995 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
16 Horst, Reiner and Pardalos, Panos M 2013 4 1 8.0 0.040 0.644 100%
17 Gafarov, Bulat and Meier, Matthias and Olea, Jose (self) 2018 2 2 1.0 0.020 0.511 50%
18 Uhlig, Harald 1994 2 2 2.5 0.020 0.511 50%
19 Nocedal, Jorge and Wright, Stephen J 2006 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
20 Sims, Christopher A 1980 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
21 Sims, Christopher A 1986 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
22 Faust, Jon 1998 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
23 Poirier, Dale J 1998 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
24 Gustafson, Paul 2009 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
25 Kline, Brendan and Tamer, Elie 2016 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 Jorda 2009 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Lu 2015 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Bugni, Federico A and Canay, Ivan A and Shi, Xiaox... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
29 Andrews, Donald WK and Soares, Gustavo 2010 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Chen, Louis HY and Fang, Xiao 2011 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Lu 1990 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Berger, James O 2013 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Kitagawa, Toru 2012 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
34 DasGupta, Anirban 2008 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
35 Ibragimov, Ildar Abdulovich and Has' Minskii, Rafa... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
36 Connault, Benjamin 2014 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
37 Horst, Reiner and Pardalos, Panos M 2013 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 Qu, Zhongjun and Tkachenko, Denis 2017 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
39 Hamermesh, Daniel S 1996 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
40 Akerlof, George A and Dickens, William T 2007 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
41 Lichter, Andreas and Peichl, Andreas and Siegloch,... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
42 Chetty, Raj and Guren, Adam and Manoli, Day and We... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
43 Reichling, Felix and Whalen, Charles 2012 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
44 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.087 0%
45 Imbens, Guido W and Manski, Charles F 2004 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.