Citation Analysis

How Much Weak Overlap Can Doubly Robust T-Statistics Handle?
Jacob Dorn
https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13273
84
Citation mentions
39
Cited references
10
Sections
9,518
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Xinwei Ma and Jingshen Wang 2020 11 6 16.5 0.131 0.969 91%
2 Charles J Stone 1982 5 4 6.5 0.060 0.928 80%
3 Crump, Richard K. and Hotz, V. Joseph and Imbens, ... 2009 10 2 17.0 0.119 0.874 100%
4 Phillip Heiler and Ekaterina Kazak 2021 5 2 6.0 0.060 0.874 100%
5 Yukun Ma and Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna and Yuya Sasaki... 2023 3 3 4.0 0.036 0.843 100%
6 Armstrong, Timothy B and Kolesár, Michal 2017 3 2 5.0 0.036 0.737 100%
7 Connors, Alfred F., Jr and Speroff, Theodore and D... 1996 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
8 Khan, Shakeeb and Tamer, Elie 2010 3 2 2.5 0.036 0.644 67%
9 Sasaki, Yuya and Ura, Takuya 2022 2 2 2.0 0.024 0.644 100%
10 Vira Semenova 2024 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
11 Saraswata Chaudhuri and Jonathan B Hill 2024 3 1 3.0 0.036 0.585 100%
12 Yang, S and Ding, P 2018 2 1 2.0 0.024 0.511 100%
13 Fan Li and Kari Lock Morgan and Alan M Zaslavsky 2018 2 1 2.0 0.024 0.511 100%
14 Wenlong Mou and Peng Ding and Martin J. Wainwright... 2023 2 2 1.5 0.024 0.511 50%
15 Alexandre B Tsybakov 2009 4 2 2.5 0.048 0.511 25%
16 Currie, Janet and Walker, Reed 2011 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
17 Bailey, Martha J. and Goodman-Bacon, Andrew 2015 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
18 Galiani, Sebastian and Gertler, Paul and Schargrod... 2005 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
19 Brian K Lee and Justin Lessler and Elizabeth A Stu... 2011 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
20 Edward L. Ionides 2008 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
21 Alexander D'Amour 2021 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
22 Imbens, Guido W. 2004 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
23 Christoph Rothe 2017 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
24 Armstrong, Timothy B. and Kolesár, Michal 2021 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
25 Khan, Samir and Ugander, Johan 2022 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
26 Goldsmith-Pinkham, Paul and Hull, Peter and Kolesá... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
27 Xinwei Ma and Yuya Sasaki and Yulong Wang 2024 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
28 Lihua Lei and Alexander D'Amour and Peng Ding and ... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
29 Peter Hall and J. S. Marron and M. H. Neumann and ... 1997 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
30 Stéphane Gaïffas 2005 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
31 David Bruns-Smith and Oliver Dukes and Avi Feller ... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
32 Victor Chernozhukov and Denis Chetverikov and Mert... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
33 Brantly Callaway and Pedro H.C. Sant’Anna 2021 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
34 Andrews, Donald W. K. and Schafgans, Marcia M. A. 1998 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
35 Shakeeb Khan and Denis Nekipelov 2024 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
36 Jinyong Hahn 1998 2 1 1.0 0.024 0.110 0%
37 Whitney K. Newey 1994 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
38 Xiaohong Chen and Han Hong and Alessandro Tarozzi 2008 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
39 Roger A Horn and Charles R Johnson 2013 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.