← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

An Introduction to \\ Double/Debiased Machine Learning
Achim Ahrens, Victor Chernozhukov, Christian Hansen, Damian Kozbur, Mark Schaffer, Thomas Wiemann
https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08324
271
Citation mentions
151
Cited references
11
Sections
11,499
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Dube, Jacobs, Naidu, Suri 2020 14 3 21.0 0.052 1.000 100%
2 Dobkin, Finkelstein, Kluender, Notowidigdo 2018 6 3 11.0 0.022 1.000 100%
3 Angrist, Imbens, Krueger 1999 5 3 9.0 0.018 1.000 100%
4 Belloni, Chen, Chernozhukov, Hansen (self) 2012 5 3 8.0 0.018 1.000 100%
5 Sun, Abraham 2021 7 3 13.0 0.026 1.000 100%
6 Callaway, Sant'Anna 2021 5 3 9.0 0.018 1.000 100%
7 Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Demirer, Duflo, Hansen,... (self) 2018 14 9 22.5 0.052 0.976 93%
8 Newey 1994 5 4 6.5 0.018 0.928 80%
9 Ahrens, Hansen, Schaffer, Wiemann (self) 2025 4 3 8.0 0.015 0.928 100%
10 Sant’Anna, Zhao 2020 6 2 12.0 0.022 0.874 100%
11 Kennedy 2023 4 3 4.5 0.015 0.843 75%
12 Chernozhukov, Escanciano, Ichimura, Newey, Robins (self) 2022 4 4 5.5 0.015 0.843 75%
13 Wager, Athey 2018 4 2 6.0 0.015 0.811 100%
14 Angrist, Krueger 1995 4 2 8.0 0.015 0.811 100%
15 Newey, McFadden 1994 3 2 4.0 0.011 0.737 100%
16 Robins, Li, Mukherjee, Tchetgen, Vaart 2017 3 2 4.0 0.011 0.737 100%
17 Chang 2020 3 2 5.0 0.011 0.737 100%
18 Farrell, Liang, Misra 2021 3 2 6.0 0.011 0.737 100%
19 Velez 2024 3 2 6.0 0.011 0.737 100%
20 Hidalgo, Naidu, Nichter, Richardson 2010 2 2 3.0 0.007 0.644 100%
21 Gilchrist, Sands 2016 2 2 3.0 0.007 0.644 100%
22 Dustmann, Fasani, Speciale 2017 2 2 3.0 0.007 0.644 100%
23 Wiemann, Ahrens, Hansen, Schaffer (self) 2023 2 2 3.0 0.007 0.644 100%
24 Chiang, Kato, Ma, Sasaki 2022 2 2 3.0 0.007 0.644 100%
25 Chi, Vossler, Fan, Lv 2022 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
26 Cattaneo, Klusowski, Yu 2025 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
27 Belloni, Chernozhukov, Ferna, Hansen (self) 2017 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
28 Wu, Zhu 2023 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
29 D\'\i 2020 3 1 3.0 0.011 0.585 100%
30 Neyman 1959 2 1 2.0 0.007 0.511 100%
31 Yatchew 1998 2 1 2.0 0.007 0.511 100%
32 Li, Racine 2006 2 1 2.0 0.007 0.511 100%
33 Chen 2007 2 1 2.0 0.007 0.511 100%
34 Ichimura, Todd 2007 2 1 2.0 0.007 0.511 100%
35 Hines, Dukes, Diaz-Ordaz, Vansteelandt 2022 2 1 2.0 0.007 0.511 100%
36 van der Vaart 1991 2 1 2.0 0.007 0.511 100%
37 Andrews 1994 2 1 2.0 0.007 0.511 100%
38 van der Vaart 1998 2 1 2.0 0.007 0.511 100%
39 Robins, Li, Tchetgen, Vaart 2008 2 1 2.0 0.007 0.511 100%
40 Belloni, Chernozhukov, Hansen (self) 2010 2 1 2.0 0.007 0.511 100%
41 Fan, Guo, Hao 2012 2 1 2.0 0.007 0.511 100%
42 Robins, Zhang, Ayyagari, Logan, Tchetgen, Li, Luml... 2013 2 1 2.0 0.007 0.511 100%
43 Hubbard, Kherad-Pajouh, van der Laan 2016 2 1 2.0 0.007 0.511 100%
44 Athey, Bayati, Imbens, Qu 2019 2 1 2.0 0.007 0.511 100%
45 Athey, Wager 2021 2 1 2.0 0.007 0.511 100%
46 Chernozhukov, Newey, Quintas-Martinez, Syrgkanis (self) 2021 3 2 2.0 0.011 0.511 33%
47 Chernozhukov, Newey, Singh (self) 2022 2 2 1.5 0.007 0.511 50%
48 Chernozhukov, Newey, Singh (self) 2022 2 2 1.5 0.007 0.511 50%
49 Imbens, Rubin 2015 2 2 2.5 0.007 0.511 50%
50 Bickel, Ritov, Tsybakov 2009 2 1 4.0 0.007 0.511 100%
51 Schmidt-Hieber 2020 2 1 4.0 0.007 0.511 100%
52 Athey, Tibshirani, Wager 2019 2 1 4.0 0.007 0.511 100%
53 Lei 2020 2 1 4.0 0.007 0.511 100%
54 van der Laan, Luedtke, Carone 2025 2 1 4.0 0.007 0.511 100%
55 Gentzkow, Kelly, Taddy 2019 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
56 Neyman 1979 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
57 Bach, Chernozhukov, Kurz, Spindler (self) 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
58 Bach, Chernozhukov, Kurz, Spindler (self) 2022 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
59 Ahrens, Hansen, Schaffer, Wiemann (self) 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
60 Heckman, Vytlacil 2007 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
61 Varian 2014 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
62 Mullainathan, Spiess 2017 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
63 Athey, Imbens 2019 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
64 Dell 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
65 Hastie, Tibshirani, Friedman 2009 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
66 James, Witten, Hastie, Tibshirani, Taylor 2023 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
67 Hasminskii, Ibragimov 1978 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
68 Bickel 1982 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
69 Pfanzagl 1982 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
70 Schick 1986 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
71 Bickel, Ritov 1988 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
72 Angrist, Krueger 1995 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
73 Chao, Swanson, Hausman, Newey, Woutersen 2012 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
74 Hansen, Kozbur (self) 2014 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
75 Chyn, Frandsen, Leslie 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
76 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
77 Scharfstein, Rotnitzky, Robins 1999 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
78 van der Laan, Rubin 2006 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
79 van der Laan, Rose 2011 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
80 Zheng, van der Laan 2011 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
81 Klosin, Vilgalys 2023 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
82 Abadie, Agarwal, Dwivedi, Shah 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
83 Haddad, Huber, Zhang 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
84 Clarke, Polselli 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
85 Chiang, Ma, Rodrigue, Sasaki 2026 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
86 Jung, Tian, Bareinboim 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
87 Deaner 2023 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
88 Singh, Sun 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
89 Bonvini, McClean, Branson, Kennedy 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
90 Lewis, Syrgkanis 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
91 Klosin 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
92 Nie, Wager 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
93 Semenova, Chernozhukov (self) 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
94 Colangelo, Lee 2023 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
95 Foster, Syrgkanis 2023 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
96 Kennedy 2023 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
97 Sasaki, Ura 2023 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
98 Kallus, Mao, Uehara 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
99 Escanciano, Pérez-Izquierdo 2023 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
100 Semenova 2023 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
101 Bia, Huber, Laffe 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
102 Farrell, Liang, Misra 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
103 de Chaisemartin, d’Haultfoeuille 2020 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
104 Goodman-Bacon 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
105 Baker, Larcker, Wang 2022 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
106 de Chaisemartin, d’Haultfoeuille 2023 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
107 Roth, Sant'Anna, Bilinski, Poe 2023 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
108 Borusyak, Jaravel, Spiess 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
109 Goldsmith-Pinkham, Hull, Kolesa 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
110 Blandhol, Bonney, Mogstad, Torgovitsky 2022 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
111 Chernozhukov, Hansen, Spindler (self) 2015 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
112 Ma 2023 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
113 Angrist, Pischke 2009 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
114 Robinson 1988 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
115 Robins, Rotnitzky, Zhao 1994 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
116 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
117 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
118 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
119 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
120 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
121 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
122 Semenova, Goldman, Chernozhukov, Taddy (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
123 Ballinari, Wehrli 2025 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
124 Belloni, Chernozhukov, Hansen (self) 2014 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
125 van de Geer, Bu, Ritov, Dezeure 2014 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
126 Javanmard, Montanari 2014 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
127 Zhang, Zhang 2014 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
128 Wiemann (self) 2026 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
129 Bekker 1994 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
130 Poterba, Venti, Wise 1995 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
131 Hahn 1998 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
132 Sokolova, Sorensen 2021 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
133 Langella, Manning 2021 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
134 Ash, Hansen (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
135 Ipeirotis 2010 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
136 Hu, Shen, Wallis, Allen-Zhu, Li, Wang, Wang, Chen 2021 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
137 Friedman, Hastie, Tibshirani 2010 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
138 Wright, Ziegler 2017 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
139 Chen, Guestrin 2016 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
140 Kalinowski, Allaire, Chollet 2025 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
141 Giannone, Lenza, Primiceri 2021 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
142 Angrist, Frandsen 2022 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
143 Bach, Schacht, Chernozhukov, Klaassen, Spindler (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
144 Wolpert 1996 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
145 Breiman 1996 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
146 van der Laan, Polley, Hubbard 2007 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
147 Bradic, Chernozhukov, Newey, Zhu (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
148 Zheng, Bonvini, Guo 2025 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
149 Chernozhukov, Cinelli, Newey, Sharma, Syrgkanis (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
150 Hirshberg, Wager 2021 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.087 0%
151 Laan, Luedtke, Carone 2025 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.