Citation Analysis – Optimizing Data-driven Weights In Multidimensional Indexes

Optimizing Data-driven Weights In Multidimensional Indexes
Lidia Ceriani, Chiara Gigliarano, Paolo Verme
https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06012

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

3,944

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Koen Decancq and Mar\'i	2013	2	2	3.0	0.071	0.644	100%
2	Bossert, Walter and Chakravarty, Satya R. and D'Am...	2013	2	2	4.0	0.071	0.644	100%
3	Federica Cugnata and Ron S. Kenett and Silvia Sali...	2016	2	2	4.0	0.071	0.644	100%
4	OECD	2015	2	1	2.0	0.071	0.511	100%
5	Amartya K Sen	1980	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
6	Amartya K Sen	1985	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
7	CNEL and ISTAT	2015	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
8	Office for National Statistics	2015	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
9	Canadian Index of Wellbeing	2012	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
10	New Economics Foundation	2013	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
11	Sabina Alkire and James E Foster	2011	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
12	Rolf Aaberge and Andrea Brandolini	2015	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
13	Kristof Bosmans and Koen Decancq and Erwin Ooghe	2015	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
14	OECD	2008	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
15	Nguyen, Viet Duong and Gigliarano, Chiara (self)	2025	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
16	Besma Belhadj	2012	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
17	Joseph E Stiglitz and Amartya Sen and Jean-Paul Fi...	2010	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
18	Zhao Zhang and Caoyuan Ma and Aiping Wang	2021	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
19	Liberati, Paolo and Resce, Giuliano and Tosi, Fran...	2023	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
20	Ceriani, Lidia and Gigliarano, Chiara (self)	2020	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
21	Scutari, Marco	2010	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
22	D. Albrecht and A.E. Nicholson and C. Whittle	2014	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
23	Asis Kumar Banerjee	2018	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
24	Guio, Anne-Catherine and Fusco, Alessio and Marlie...		1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Koen Decancq and Mar\'i

2013

3.0

0.071

0.644

100%

Bossert, Walter and Chakravarty, Satya R. and D'Am...

2013

4.0

0.071

0.644

100%

Federica Cugnata and Ron S. Kenett and Silvia Sali...

2016

4.0

0.071

0.644

100%

OECD

2015

2.0

0.071

0.511

100%

Amartya K Sen

1980

1.0

0.036

0.406

100%

Amartya K Sen

1985

1.0

0.036

0.406

100%

CNEL and ISTAT

2015

1.0

0.036

0.406

100%

Office for National Statistics

2015

1.0

0.036

0.406

100%

Canadian Index of Wellbeing

2012

1.0

0.036

0.406

100%

New Economics Foundation

2013

1.0

0.036

0.406

100%

Sabina Alkire and James E Foster

2011

1.0

0.036

0.406

100%

Rolf Aaberge and Andrea Brandolini

2015

1.0

0.036

0.406

100%

Kristof Bosmans and Koen Decancq and Erwin Ooghe

2015

1.0

0.036

0.406

100%

OECD

2008

1.0

0.036

0.406

100%

Nguyen, Viet Duong and Gigliarano, Chiara (self)

2025

1.0

0.036

0.406

100%

Besma Belhadj

2012

1.0

0.036

0.406

100%

Joseph E Stiglitz and Amartya Sen and Jean-Paul Fi...

2010

1.0

0.036

0.406

100%

Zhao Zhang and Caoyuan Ma and Aiping Wang

2021

2.0

0.036

0.406

100%

Liberati, Paolo and Resce, Giuliano and Tosi, Fran...

2023

2.0

0.036

0.406

100%

Ceriani, Lidia and Gigliarano, Chiara (self)

2020

2.0

0.036

0.406

100%

Scutari, Marco

2010

2.0

0.036

0.406

100%

D. Albrecht and A.E. Nicholson and C. Whittle

2014

2.0

0.036

0.406

100%

Asis Kumar Banerjee

2018

2.0

0.036

0.406

100%

Guio, Anne-Catherine and Fusco, Alessio and Marlie...

2.0

0.036

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.