Citation Analysis

Reinterpreting demand estimation
Jiafeng Chen
https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23524
84
Citation mentions
37
Cited references
8
Sections
3,565
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Berry, Steven T and Haile, Philip A 2014 15 5 24.0 0.179 0.977 93%
2 Berry, Steven T and Haile, Philip A 2024 14 5 20.0 0.167 0.923 79%
3 Andrews, Isaiah and Barahona, Nano and Gentzkow, M... 2025 4 3 4.5 0.048 0.843 75%
4 Newey, Whitney K and Powell, James L 2003 3 3 6.0 0.036 0.843 100%
5 Berry, Steven T and Haile, Philip A 2021 3 2 5.0 0.036 0.737 100%
6 Vytlacil, Edward 2002 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
7 Vytlacil, Edward 2006 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
8 Guido W. Imbens and Joshua D. Angrist 1994 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
9 Borusyak, Kirill and Chen, Jiafeng and Hull, Peter... (self) 2025 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
10 Angrist, Joshua D and Graddy, Kathryn and Imbens, ... 2000 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
11 Doksum, Kjell 1974 2 2 4.0 0.024 0.644 100%
12 Berry, Steven T and Levinsohn, James and Pakes, Ar... 1995 3 1 6.0 0.036 0.585 100%
13 Tebaldi, Pietro and Torgovitsky, Alexander and Yan... 2023 3 1 6.0 0.036 0.585 100%
14 Borusyak, Kirill and Bravo, Mauricio Caceres and H... 2025 2 1 2.0 0.024 0.511 100%
15 Berry, Steven and Levinsohn, James and Pakes, Arie... 2004 2 2 2.5 0.024 0.511 50%
16 Conlon, Christopher and Gortmaker, Jeff 2025 2 2 2.5 0.024 0.511 50%
17 Neyman, Jerzy 1923/1990 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
18 Rubin, Donald B 1974 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
19 Breiman, Leo 2001 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
20 Nevo, Aviv and Whinston, Michael D. 2010 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
21 Angrist, Joshua D. and Pischke, Jo 2010 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
22 Pakes, Ariel and Porter, Jack and Ho, Kate and Ish... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
23 Kline, Patrick and Walters, Christopher R 2019 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
24 Kong, Xinyao and Dube 2024 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
25 Humphries, John Eric and Ouss, Aurelie and Stavrev... 2025 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
26 Torgovitsky, Alexander 2019 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
27 Mogstad, Magne and Torgovitsky, Alexander 2024 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
28 Conlon, Christopher and Mortimer, Julie Holland 2021 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
29 Chesher, Andrew 1984 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
30 Hahn, Jinyong and Newey, Whitney K and Smith, Rich... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
31 Qian, Eric 2025 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
32 Compiani, Giovanni 2018 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
33 Heckman, James J and Smith, Jeffrey and Clements, ... 1997 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
34 Berry, Steven and Gandhi, Amit and Haile, Philip 2013 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
35 Ackerberg, Daniel and Benkard, C Lanier and Berry,... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
36 Andrews, Isaiah and Chen, Jiafeng and Tecchio, Ota... (self) 2025 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
37 Chernozhukov, Victor and Hansen, Christian 2005 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.