Citation Analysis – Large Structural VARs with Multiple Sign and Ranking Restrictions

Large Structural VARs with Multiple Sign and Ranking Restrictions
Joshua Chan, Christian Matthes, Xuewen Yu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20668

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

7,677

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Uhlig	2005	10	5	17.0	0.110	1.000	100%
2	Rubio-Ramirez, Waggoner, and Zha	2010	20	7	34.0	0.220	1.000	100%
3	Chan (self)	2022	6	4	11.0	0.066	1.000	100%
4	Read	2022	9	5	17.0	0.099	1.000	100%
5	Amir-Ahmadi and Drautzburg	2021	4	3	6.0	0.044	0.928	100%
6	Furlanetto, Ravazzolo, and Sarferaz	2019	4	3	7.0	0.044	0.928	100%
7	Crump, Eusepi, Giannone, Qian, and Sbordone	2021	4	2	5.0	0.044	0.811	100%
8	Hansen and Sargent	1991	2	2	3.0	0.022	0.644	100%
9	Lippi and Reichlin	1993	2	2	3.0	0.022	0.644	100%
10	Lippi and Reichlin	1994	2	2	3.0	0.022	0.644	100%
11	Faust	1998	2	2	3.0	0.022	0.644	100%
12	Canova and Nicolo	2002	2	2	3.0	0.022	0.644	100%
13	Baumeister and Hamilton	2015	2	2	3.0	0.022	0.644	100%
14	Bruns and Piffer	2023	2	2	3.0	0.022	0.644	100%
15	Sims	1980	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
16	Leeper, Sims, and Zha	1996	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
17	Ba\'nbura, Giannone, and Reichlin	2010	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
18	Carriero, Kapetanios, and Marcellino	2009	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
19	Koop	2013	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
20	Ellahie and Ricco	2017	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
21	Graeve and Karas	2014	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
22	Korobilis	2022	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
23	Chan, Eisenstat, and Yu (self)	2022	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
24	Kociecki	2010	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
25	Baumeister and Hamilton	2018	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
26	Canova and Paustian	2011	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
27	Arias, Rubio-Ramirez, Shin, and Waggoner	2024	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
28	Beaudry and Portier	2006	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
29	Lutkepohl	2005	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
30	Gambetti	2021	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
31	Loria, Matthes, and Wang (self)	2022	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
32	Arias, Rubio-Ramirez, and Waggoner	2018	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
33	Caldara and Herbst	2019	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
34	Muirhead	1982	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Uhlig

2005

17.0

0.110

1.000

100%

Rubio-Ramirez, Waggoner, and Zha

2010

34.0

0.220

1.000

100%

Chan (self)

2022

11.0

0.066

1.000

100%

Read

2022

17.0

0.099

1.000

100%

Amir-Ahmadi and Drautzburg

2021

6.0

0.044

0.928

100%

Furlanetto, Ravazzolo, and Sarferaz

2019

7.0

0.044

0.928

100%

Crump, Eusepi, Giannone, Qian, and Sbordone

2021

5.0

0.044

0.811

100%

Hansen and Sargent

1991

3.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Lippi and Reichlin

1993

3.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Lippi and Reichlin

1994

3.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Faust

1998

3.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Canova and Nicolo

2002

3.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Baumeister and Hamilton

2015

3.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Bruns and Piffer

2023

3.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Sims

1980

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Leeper, Sims, and Zha

1996

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Ba\'nbura, Giannone, and Reichlin

2010

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Carriero, Kapetanios, and Marcellino

2009

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Koop

2013

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Ellahie and Ricco

2017

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Graeve and Karas

2014

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Korobilis

2022

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Chan, Eisenstat, and Yu (self)

2022

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Kociecki

2010

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Baumeister and Hamilton

2018

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Canova and Paustian

2011

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Arias, Rubio-Ramirez, Shin, and Waggoner

2024

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Beaudry and Portier

2006

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Lutkepohl

2005

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Gambetti

2021

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Loria, Matthes, and Wang (self)

2022

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Arias, Rubio-Ramirez, and Waggoner

2018

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Caldara and Herbst

2019

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Muirhead

1982

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.