← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Treatment Effects Inference with High-Dimensional Instruments and Control Variables
Xiduo Chen, Xingdong Feng, Antonio F. Galvao, Yeheng Ge
https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20149
79
Citation mentions
39
Cited references
10
Sections
8,510
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Chernozhukov, V., C. Hansen, and M. Spindler 2015 8 6 14.0 0.101 1.000 100%
2 Hansen, C. and D. Kozbur 2014 16 6 29.0 0.203 1.000 100%
3 Liu, X., S. Zheng, and X. Feng (self) 2020 6 5 8.0 0.076 0.874 67%
4 Angrist, J. D. and A. B. Krueger 1991 4 2 7.0 0.051 0.811 100%
5 Chernozhukov, V., D. Chetverikov, M. Demirer, E. D... 2018 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
6 Hausman, J. A., W. K. Newey, T. Woutersen, J. C. C... 2012 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
7 Belloni, A., D. Chen, V. Chernozhukov, and C. Hans... (self) 2012 3 1 3.0 0.038 0.585 100%
8 Chao, J. C., N. R. Swanson, J. A. Hausman, W. K. N... 2012 3 1 6.0 0.038 0.585 100%
9 Zhu, Y 2018 2 1 2.0 0.025 0.511 100%
10 Mikusheva, A. and L. Sun 2022 2 1 2.0 0.025 0.511 100%
11 He, X. and Q.-M. Shao 2000 2 2 1.5 0.025 0.511 50%
12 Liu, Y. and J. Xie 2020 2 1 4.0 0.025 0.511 100%
13 Belloni, A., V. Chernozhukov, and C. Hansen 2014a 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
14 Angrist, J. D. and B. Frandsen 2022 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
15 Imbens, G. W. and D. B. Rubin 2015 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
16 Cattaneo, M., M. Jansson, and X. Ma 2019 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
17 Gold, D., J. Lederer, and J. Tao 2020 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
18 Qiu, Y., J. Tao, and X.-H. Zhou 2021 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
19 Chao, J. C., N. R. Swanson, and T. Woutersen 2023 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
20 Zhang, C.-H. and S. S. Zhang 2014 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
21 Farrell, M. H 2015 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
22 Belloni, A., V. Chernozhukov, and K. Kato 2015 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
23 Belloni, A., V. Chernozhukov, and Y. Wei 2016 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
24 Cha, J., H. D. Chiang, and Y. Sasaki 2023 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
25 Buhlmann, P. and B. Yu 2003 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
26 Belloni, A., V. Chernozhukov, and C. Hansen 2014b 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
27 Kozbur, D 2017 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
28 S\olvsten, M 2020 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
29 Kozbur, D 2020 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
30 Ing, C.-K 2020 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
31 Li, C. and U. K. Muller 2021 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
32 Angrist, J. D. and A. B. Krueger 1995 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
33 Angrist, J. D., G. W. Imbens, and A. B. Krueger 1999 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
34 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
35 Friedman, J., T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani 2010 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
36 Vershynin, R 2010 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
37 Vovk, V., B. Wang, and R. Wang 2022 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
38 Belloni, A., V. Chernozhukov, I. Fernandez-Val, an... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
39 Chen, S. X. and Y.-L. Qin (self) 2010 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.