← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

EASI Drugs in the Streets of Colombia: Heterogeneous Drug Preferences and Marijuana Legalization
Santiago Montoya-Blandón, Andrés Ramírez-Hassan
https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20100
119
Citation mentions
79
Cited references
11
Sections
10,484
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Lewbel, Arthur and Pendakur, Krishna 2009 5 5 9.0 0.042 1.000 100%
2 Zhen, Chen and Finkelstein, Eric A. and Nonnemaker... 2014 4 4 8.0 0.034 0.928 100%
3 Anderson, D Mark and Rees, Daniel I 2023 4 2 6.0 0.034 0.811 100%
4 Ramírez-Hassan, Andre (self) 2023 4 2 8.0 0.034 0.811 100%
5 Rami 2021 3 2 4.0 0.025 0.737 100%
6 Puerta-Cuartas, Alejandro and Ram\'\i 2024 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
7 Rami 2024 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
8 Kasteridis, Panagiotis and Yen, Steven T. and Fang... 2011 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
9 A. Deaton and J. Muellbauer 1980 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
10 J. Banks and R. Blundell and A. Lewbel 1997 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
11 Ve 2021 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
12 Richard Needle and Hamilton McCubbin and Jon Loren... 1983 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
13 Ellen R. Harrison and John Haaga and Toni Richards 1993 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
14 Johnson, Timothy and Fendrich, Michael 2005 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
15 Fadnes, Lars T. and Taube, Adam and Tylleska 2009 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
16 Jacobi, Liana and Sovinsky, Michelle 2016 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
17 Gavrilova, Evelina and Kamada, Takuma and Zoutman,... 2019 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
18 Burkhardt, Jesse and Goemans, Chris 2019 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
19 Kehlbacher, Ariane and Srinivasan, Chittur and McC... 2020 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
20 Kandel, Denise 1975 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
21 Lynskey, Michael and Agrawal, Arpana 2018 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
22 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
23 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
24 Lacruz, Ana and Molina, Jos\'e 2009 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
25 Tauchmann, Harald and Lenz, Silja and Requate, Til... 2013 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
26 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
27 Bretteville-Jensen, Anne L. and Melberg, Hans O. a... 2008 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
28 Kass, Robert E and Raftery, Adrian E 1995 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
29 Jofre-Bonet, Mireia and Petry, Nancy M 2008 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
30 Plu 2024 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
31 UNODC 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
32 Becker, Gary S. and Murphy, Kevin M. and Grossman,... 2006 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
33 Hall, Wayne and Lynskey, Michael 2016 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
34 Pablo Fajnzylber and Daniel Lederman and Norman Lo... 2002 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
35 Pinotti, Paolo 2015 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
36 Queirolo, Rosario and Rossel, Cecilia and A 2019 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
37 Huber III, Arthur and Newman, Rebecca and LaFave, ... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
38 Dragone, Davide and Prarolo, Giovanni and Vanin, P... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
39 Brinkman, Jeffrey and Mok-Lamme, David 2019 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
40 Wu, Guangzhen and Boateng, Francis D and Lang, Xia... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
41 Chu, Yu-Wei Luke and Townsend, Wilbur 2019 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
42 Wu, Guangzhen and Li, Yongtao and Lang, Xiaodong E... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
43 UNODC 2021 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
44 Tiffin, Richard and Arnoult, Matthieu 2010 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
45 Jacobi, Liana and Nghiem, Nhung and Rami 2021 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
46 Thies, Clifford F. and Register, Charles A. 1993 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
47 Deza, Monica 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
48 Blundell, Richard and Pashardes, Panos and Weber, ... 1993 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
49 Moro, Daniele and Sckokai, Paolo 2000 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
50 Bonnet, Ce 2013 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
51 von Haefen, Roger H. and Phaneuf, Daniel J. and Pa... 2004 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
52 Bertail, Patrice and Caillavet, France 2008 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
53 DeSimone, Jeffrey 1998 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
54 van Ours, Jan C. 2003 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
55 van Ours, Jan C. 2006 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
56 Fergusson, David M. and Boden, Joseph M. and Horwo... 2006 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
57 Melberg, Hans Olav and Jones, Andrew M. and Brette... 2010 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
58 Deza, Monica 2015 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
59 Jorgensen, Cody and Wells, Jessica 2022 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
60 Shane Darke 1998 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
61 BanRep 2019 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
62 Blundell, R. and Chen, X. and Kristensen, D. 2007 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
63 Galenianos, Manolis and Gavazza, Alessandro 2017 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
64 Embree, Bryan G. and Whitehead, Paul C. 1993 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
65 Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M. and de Jong, Martijn... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
66 Rosenman, Robert and Tennekoon, Vidhura and Hill, ... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
67 Fru 2006 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
68 Shaun Riley and Nicole Vellios and Corné van Walbe... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
69 Renu Sukharomana and Chia Lin Chang 2017 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
70 Adam J. Davis and Karl R. Geisler and Mark W. Nich... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
71 Craig A. Gallet 2014 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
72 Caulkins, Jonathan Paul and Kilmer, Beau and Kleim... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
73 Gruber, Jonathan and Ko 2001 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
74 Arnabal, Luis Rodrigo 2021 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
75 Fleissig, Adrian R 2021 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
76 Hansen, Benjamin and Miller, Keaton and Seo, Boyou... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
77 Lockwood, Benjamin B and Taubinsky, Dmitry 2017 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
78 Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens and Donald B... 1996 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
79 Guido W. Imbens 2014 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.