Citation Analysis – Testing Conditional Stochastic Dominance at Target Points

Testing Conditional Stochastic Dominance at Target Points
Federico A. Bugni, Ivan A. Canay, Deborah Kim
https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14747

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

13,187

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Shen, S. and X. Zhang	2016	5	3	8.0	0.064	1.000	100%
2	Goldman, M. and D. M. Kaplan	2018	6	4	10.0	0.077	1.000	100%
3	Bugni, F. A., I. A. Canay, and D. Kim (self)	2025	7	3	13.0	0.090	1.000	100%
4	Hodges, J.	1958	6	2	9.0	0.077	0.874	100%
5	Hajek, J., Z. Sidak, and P. K. Sen	1999	3	3	6.0	0.038	0.843	100%
6	McFadden, D.	1989	4	2	6.0	0.051	0.811	100%
7	Gnedenko, B. V. and V. S. Korolyuk	1951	2	2	3.0	0.026	0.644	100%
8	Korolyuk, V. S.	1955	2	2	3.0	0.026	0.644	100%
9	Blackman, J.	1956	2	2	3.0	0.026	0.644	100%
10	Hájek, J. and Z. Šidák	1967	2	2	3.0	0.026	0.644	100%
11	Durbin, J.	1973	2	2	3.0	0.026	0.644	100%
12	Canay, I. A. and V. Kamat (self)	2018	2	2	4.0	0.026	0.644	100%
13	Pollard, D.	2002	2	2	4.0	0.026	0.644	100%
14	Linton, O., K. Song, and Y.-J. Whang	2010	2	1	2.0	0.026	0.511	100%
15	Donald, S. G., Y.-C. Hsu, and G. F. Barrett	2012	2	1	2.0	0.026	0.511	100%
16	Qu, Z. and J. Yoon	2019	2	1	2.0	0.026	0.511	100%
17	Armstrong, T. B. and M. Kolesar	2018	2	1	4.0	0.026	0.511	100%
18	Becker, G. S.	1957	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
19	Canay, I. A., M. Mogstad, and J. Mountjoy (self)	2024	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
20	Bharadwaj, P., R. Deb, and L. Renou	2024	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
21	Anderson, G.	1996	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
22	Davidson, R. and J.-Y. Duclos	2000	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
23	Abadie, A.	2002	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
24	Barrett, G. F. and S. G. Donald	2003	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
25	Linton, O., E. Maasoumi, and Y.-J. Whang	2005	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
26	Delgado, M. A. and J. C. Escanciano	2013	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
27	Gonzalo, J. and J. Olmo	2014	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
28	Chang, M., S. Lee, and Y.-J. Whang	2015	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
29	Andrews, D. W. and X. Shi	2017	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
30	Reiss, R.-D.	1989	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
31	Kaufmann, E. and R.-D. Reiss	1992	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
32	David, H. and J. Galambos	1974	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
33	Bhattacharya, P.	1974	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
34	Bugni, F. A. and I. A. Canay (self)	2021	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
35	Lehmann, E. L.	1951	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
36	Lehmann, E. L. and J. P. Romano	2005	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
37	Chung, E. and J. P. Romano	2013	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
38	Canay, I. A., J. P. Romano, and A. M. Shaikh (self)	2017	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
39	Bugni, F. A., I. A. Canay, and A. M. Shaikh (self)	2018	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
40	Caughey, D., A. Dafoe, X. Li, and L. Miratrix	2023	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
41	Battistin, E., A. Brugiavini, E. Rettore, and G. W...	2009	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
42			1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Shen, S. and X. Zhang

2016

8.0

0.064

1.000

100%

Goldman, M. and D. M. Kaplan

2018

10.0

0.077

1.000

100%

Bugni, F. A., I. A. Canay, and D. Kim (self)

2025

13.0

0.090

1.000

100%

Hodges, J.

1958

9.0

0.077

0.874

100%

Hajek, J., Z. Sidak, and P. K. Sen

1999

6.0

0.038

0.843

100%

McFadden, D.

1989

6.0

0.051

0.811

100%

Gnedenko, B. V. and V. S. Korolyuk

1951

3.0

0.026

0.644

100%

Korolyuk, V. S.

1955

3.0

0.026

0.644

100%

Blackman, J.

1956

3.0

0.026

0.644

100%

Hájek, J. and Z. Šidák

1967

3.0

0.026

0.644

100%

Durbin, J.

1973

3.0

0.026

0.644

100%

Canay, I. A. and V. Kamat (self)

2018

4.0

0.026

0.644

100%

Pollard, D.

2002

4.0

0.026

0.644

100%

Linton, O., K. Song, and Y.-J. Whang

2010

2.0

0.026

0.511

100%

Donald, S. G., Y.-C. Hsu, and G. F. Barrett

2012

2.0

0.026

0.511

100%

Qu, Z. and J. Yoon

2019

2.0

0.026

0.511

100%

Armstrong, T. B. and M. Kolesar

2018

4.0

0.026

0.511

100%

Becker, G. S.

1957

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Canay, I. A., M. Mogstad, and J. Mountjoy (self)

2024

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Bharadwaj, P., R. Deb, and L. Renou

2024

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Anderson, G.

1996

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Davidson, R. and J.-Y. Duclos

2000

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Abadie, A.

2002

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Barrett, G. F. and S. G. Donald

2003

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Linton, O., E. Maasoumi, and Y.-J. Whang

2005

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Delgado, M. A. and J. C. Escanciano

2013

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Gonzalo, J. and J. Olmo

2014

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Chang, M., S. Lee, and Y.-J. Whang

2015

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Andrews, D. W. and X. Shi

2017

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Reiss, R.-D.

1989

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Kaufmann, E. and R.-D. Reiss

1992

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

David, H. and J. Galambos

1974

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Bhattacharya, P.

1974

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Bugni, F. A. and I. A. Canay (self)

2021

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Lehmann, E. L.

1951

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Lehmann, E. L. and J. P. Romano

2005

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Chung, E. and J. P. Romano

2013

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Canay, I. A., J. P. Romano, and A. M. Shaikh (self)

2017

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Bugni, F. A., I. A. Canay, and A. M. Shaikh (self)

2018

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Caughey, D., A. Dafoe, X. Li, and L. Miratrix

2023

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Battistin, E., A. Brugiavini, E. Rettore, and G. W...

2009

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.