← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Difference-in-Differences Designs: A Practitioner's Guide
Andrew Baker, Brantly Callaway, Scott Cunningham, Andrew Goodman-Bacon, Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna
https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13323
311
Citation mentions
131
Cited references
7
Sections
16,473
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Goodman-Bacon (self) 2021 5 3 9.0 0.016 1.000 100%
2 de Chaisemartin and D'Haultfoeuille 2020 11 7 21.0 0.035 1.000 100%
3 Sun and Abraham 2021 11 6 21.0 0.035 1.000 100%
4 Borusyak, Jaravel and Spiess 2024 9 6 17.0 0.029 1.000 100%
5 Roth, Sant'Anna, Bilinski and Poe (self) 2023 6 4 10.0 0.019 1.000 100%
6 Ghanem, Sant'Anna and Wüthrich (self) 2022 6 3 12.0 0.019 1.000 100%
7 Callaway and Sant'Anna (self) 2021 19 8 38.0 0.061 1.000 100%
8 Abadie 2005 5 3 10.0 0.016 1.000 100%
9 de Chaisemartin and D'Haultfoeuille 2023 7 4 13.0 0.023 1.000 100%
10 Wooldridge 2021 8 4 16.0 0.026 1.000 100%
11 Liu, Wang and Xu 2024 6 3 12.0 0.019 1.000 100%
12 Borgschulte and Vogler 2020 4 3 8.0 0.013 0.928 100%
13 Gardner 2021 4 3 8.0 0.013 0.928 100%
14 Marcus and Sant'Anna (self) 2021 4 3 8.0 0.013 0.928 100%
15 Sant'Anna and Zhao (self) 2020 12 2 24.0 0.039 0.874 100%
16 Rambachan and Roth 2023 7 2 14.0 0.023 0.874 100%
17 Chen, Sant'Anna and Xie (self) 2024 6 2 12.0 0.019 0.874 100%
18 de Chaisemartin and D'Haultfoeuille 2023 3 3 5.0 0.010 0.843 100%
19 Athey and Imbens 2006 3 3 6.0 0.010 0.843 100%
20 Cengiz, Dube, Lindner and Zipperer 2019 3 3 6.0 0.010 0.843 100%
21 Roth and Sant'Anna (self) 2023 4 2 8.0 0.013 0.811 100%
22 Caetano and Callaway (self) 2024 4 2 8.0 0.013 0.811 100%
23 Freyaldenhoven, Hansen, Perez-Perez and Shapiro 2024 4 2 8.0 0.013 0.811 100%
24 Imbens and Rubin 2015 3 2 6.0 0.010 0.737 100%
25 Harmon 2024 3 2 6.0 0.010 0.737 100%
26 Callaway, Goodman-Bacon and Sant'Anna (self) 2021 5 1 10.0 0.016 0.693 100%
27 de Chaisemartin, D'Haultfoeuille, Pasquier and Vaz... 2024 5 1 10.0 0.016 0.693 100%
28 Sant'Anna and Xu (self) 2023 8 1 16.0 0.026 0.693 100%
29 Baker, Larcker and Wang (self) 2022 2 2 3.0 0.006 0.644 100%
30 Callaway (self) 2023 2 2 3.0 0.006 0.644 100%
31 Miller, Johnson and Wherry 2021 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
32 Wyse and Meyer 2024 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
33 Robins 1986 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
34 Callaway and Li (self) 2019 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
35 Roth and Sant'Anna (self) 2023 2 2 3.0 0.006 0.644 100%
36 Freyaldenhoven, Hansen and Shapiro 2019 2 2 3.0 0.006 0.644 100%
37 Lee and Wooldridge 2023 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
38 Abadie, Athey, Imbens and Wooldridge 2020 3 1 6.0 0.010 0.585 100%
39 Abadie, Athey, Imbens and Wooldridge 2023 3 1 6.0 0.010 0.585 100%
40 Roth 2022 3 1 6.0 0.010 0.585 100%
41 Montiel Olea and Plagborg-Moller 2018 3 1 6.0 0.010 0.585 100%
42 Olden and M\oen 2022 3 1 6.0 0.010 0.585 100%
43 Ortiz-Villavicencio and Sant'Anna (self) 2025 3 1 6.0 0.010 0.585 100%
44 Marx, Tamer and Tang 2024 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
45 Rambachan and Roth 2024 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
46 Austin 2009 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
47 Mogstad and Torgovitsky 2024 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
48 Sloczynski 2022 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
49 Ma, Sant'Anna, Sasaki and Ura (self) 2023 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
50 Bilinski and Hatfield 2018 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
51 Manski and Pepper 2018 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
52 Dette and Schumann 2024 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
53 Imai, Kim and Wang 2023 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
54 Callaway, Goodman-Bacon and Sant'Anna (self) 2024 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
55 Callaway (self) 2021 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
56 Currie, Kleven and Zwiers 2020 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
57 Semmelweis 1983 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
58 Snow 1855 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
59 Lechner 2011 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
60 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
61 Sommers and Epstein 2013 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
62 Black, Hollingsworth, Nunes and Simon 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
63 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
64 Rubin 1974 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
65 Abbring and van den Berg 2003 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
66 Malani and Reif 2015 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
67 Solon, Haider and Wooldridge 2015 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
68 Fernandez-Val, Meier, van Vuuren and Vella 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
69 Heckman 2000 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
70 Ashenfelter and Card 1985 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
71 Heckman and Robb 1985 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
72 Chabe-Ferret 2015 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
73 DiNardo and Lee 2011 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
74 Wooldridge 2003 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
75 Bertrand, Duflo and Mullainathan 2004 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
76 Donald and Lang 2007 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
77 Cameron, Gelbach and Miller 2008 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
78 Conley and Taber 2011 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
79 Currie and Schwandt 2016 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
80 Ho, Imai, King and Stuart 2007 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
81 Khan and Tamer 2010 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
82 Caetano, Callaway, Payne and Rodrigues (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
83 Angrist 1998 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
84 Aronow and Samii 2015 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
85 Goldsmith-Pinkham, Hull and Kolesar 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
86 Poirier and Sloczynski 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
87 Heckman, Ichimura and Todd 1997 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
88 Rosenbaum and Rubin 1983 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
89 Graham, Pinto and Egel 2012 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
90 Sant'Anna and Zhao (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
91 Crump, Hotz, Imbens and Mitnik 2009 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
92 Sasaki and Ura 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
93 Chang 2020 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
94 Seaman and Vansteelandt 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
95 Kennedy, Ma, McHugh and Small 2017 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
96 Smucler, Rotnitzky and Robins 2019 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
97 Chernozhukov, Fernández-Val and Luo 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
98 Chernozhukov, Demirer, Duflo and Fernández-Val 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
99 Kahn-Lang and Lang 2020 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
100 Mora and Reggio 2019 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
101 Dube, Girardi, Jorda and Taylor 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
102 Fadlon and Nielsen 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
103 Deshpande and Li 2019 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
104 Imai and Kim 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
105 Strezhnev 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
106 de Chaisemartin and D'Haultfoeuille 2018 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
107 Miyaji 2024 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
108 Wooldridge 2023 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
109 Tchetgen Tchetgen, Park and Richardson 2024 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
110 Yanagi 2023 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
111 Arkhangelsky, Athey, Hirshberg, Imbens and Wager 2021 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
112 Callaway and Karami (self) 2023 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
113 Imbens, Kallus and Mao 2021 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
114 Athey and Imbens 2022 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
115 Arkhangelsky, Imbens, Lei and Luo 2024 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
116 de Chaisemartin, D'Haultfœuille and Vazquez-Bare 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
117 Angrist and Imbens 1995 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
118 Gruber 1994 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
119 Strezhnev 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
120 Caron 2025 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
121 Bonhomme and Sauder 2011 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
122 Callaway, Li and Oka (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
123 Ghanem, Kedagni and Mourifie 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
124 Fernandez-Val, Meier, van Vuuren and Vella 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
125 Meyer, Viscusi and Durbin 1995 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
126 Finkelstein and McKnight 2008 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
127 Firpo and Pinto 2016 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
128 Heckman, Smith and Clements 1997 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
129 Fan and Yu 2012 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
130 Hong 2013 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
131 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.