Citation Analysis

\bf On a new robust method of inference for general time series models
Zihan Wang, Xinghao Qiao, Dong Li, Howell Tong
https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08655
86
Citation mentions
65
Cited references
8
Sections
4,272
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Ling, Shiqing and McAleer, Michael 2003 3 3 5.0 0.035 0.843 100%
2 Ling, Shiqing and McAleer, Michael 2010 4 2 6.0 0.047 0.811 100%
3 Francq, Christian and Zako\"\i 2019 3 2 4.0 0.035 0.737 100%
4 Ling, Shiqing and Li, Wai Keung 1997 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
5 Li, Dong and Tao, Yuxin and Yang, Yaxing and Zhang... 2023 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
6 Francq, Christian and Zako\"\i 2015 4 1 8.0 0.047 0.644 100%
7 Box, George EP and Jenkins, Gwilym M and Reinsel, ... 2016 2 1 2.0 0.023 0.511 100%
8 Bardet, Jean-Marc and Wintenberger, Olivier 2009 2 1 2.0 0.023 0.511 100%
9 2 1 2.0 0.023 0.511 100%
10 Francq, Christian and Zako\"\i 2004 2 1 2.0 0.023 0.511 100%
11 Fan, Jianqing and Qi, Lei and Xiu, Dacheng 2014 2 1 2.0 0.023 0.511 100%
12 Huber, Peter J. 1981 2 1 2.0 0.023 0.511 100%
13 Wooldridge, Jeffrey M 2020 2 1 2.0 0.023 0.511 100%
14 Jeantheau, Thierry 1998 2 1 4.0 0.023 0.511 100%
15 Ling, Shiqing 1999 2 1 4.0 0.023 0.511 100%
16 Pena, Daniel and Tsay, Ruey S. 2021 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
17 Woodward, Wayne A. and Sadler, Bivin Philip and Ro... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
18 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
19 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
20 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
21 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
22 Yao, Qiwei and Brockwell, Peter J 2006 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
23 Boubacar Mainassara, Yacouba and Saussereau, Bruno 2018 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
24 Wilms, Ines and Basu, Sumanta and Bien, Jacob and ... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
25 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
26 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
27 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
28 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
29 Straumann, Daniel and Mikosch, Thomas 2006 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
30 Jiang, Feiyu and Li, Dong and Zhu, Ke 2021 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
31 Yu, Cheng and Li, Dong and Jiang, Feiyu and Zhu, K... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
32 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
33 Francq, Christian and Lepage, Guillaume and Zako\"... 2011 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
34 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
35 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
36 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
37 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
38 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
39 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
40 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
41 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
42 Bai, Jushan 2003 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
43 Li, Guodong and Li, Wai Keung 2008 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
44 Zhu, Ke and Ling, Shiqing 2015 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
45 Zhu, Ke 2019 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
46 Zhang, Xingfa and Zhang, Rongmao and Li, Yuan and ... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
47 Li, Guodong and Li, Yang and Tsai, Chih-Ling 2015 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
48 Zheng, Yao and Zhu, Qianqian and Li, Guodong and X... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
49 Zhu, Qianqian and Zheng, Yao and Li, Guodong 2018 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
50 Wang, Guochang and Zhu, Ke and Li, Guodong and Li,... (self) 2022 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
51 Zhu, Qianqian and Tan, Songhua and Zheng, Yao and ... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
52 Mukherjee, K 2020 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
53 Loh, Po-Ling 2025 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
54 Berkes, Istvan and Horvath, Lajos 2004 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
55 Gue 1994 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
56 Cline, Daren BH and Pu, Huay-min H 2004 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
57 Bougerol, Philippe and Picard, Nico 1992 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
58 Brockwell, Peter J and Liu, Jian and Tweedie, Rich... 1992 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
59 Li, CW and Li, Wai Keung 1996 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
60 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
61 Haggan, Vale 1981 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
62 Chen, Guang-yong and Gan, Min and Chen, Guo-long 2018 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
63 Li, Dong and Zhang, Xingfa and Zhu, Ke and Ling, S... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
64 Phillips, Peter CB and Perron, Pierre 1988 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
65 Malik, Henrick J and Abraham, Bovas 1973 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.