Citation Analysis

\Large Functional Linear Projection and Impulse Response Analysis
Won-Ki Seo, Dakyung Seong
https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08364
169
Citation mentions
43
Cited references
15
Sections
16,760
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Jorda, O 2005 11 3 17.0 0.065 1.000 100%
2 Inoue, A. and B. Rossi 2021 24 6 43.0 0.142 1.000 100%
3 Shin, H 2009 6 4 10.0 0.036 1.000 100%
4 Barbaglia, L., S. Consoli, and S. Manzan 2023 7 3 12.0 0.041 1.000 100%
5 Plagborg-Møller, M. and C. K. Wolf 2021 4 3 7.0 0.024 0.928 100%
6 Imaizumi, M. and K. Kato 2018 4 3 4.5 0.024 0.843 75%
7 Aneiros-P\'erez, G. and P. Vieu 2006 3 3 5.0 0.018 0.843 100%
8 Mas, A 2007 4 4 6.5 0.024 0.843 75%
9 Hall, P. and J. L. Horowitz 2007 4 2 5.0 0.024 0.811 100%
10 Nielsen, M. \O., W.-K. Seo, and D. Seong (self) 2023 4 2 8.0 0.024 0.811 100%
11 Florens, J.-P. and S. Van Bellegem 2015 4 2 3.5 0.024 0.737 75%
12 Conway, J. B 1994 3 3 4.5 0.018 0.737 67%
13 Bosq, D 2000 12 8 12.0 0.071 0.693 33%
14 Sims, C. A 1972 4 2 6.0 0.024 0.644 50%
15 Bj\ornland, H. C., Y. Chang, and J. Cross 2023 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
16 Bart, H., A. C. M. Ran, I. Gohberg, and M. Kaashoe... 2007 3 2 4.5 0.018 0.644 67%
17 Seong, D. and W.-K. Seo (self) 2024 23 7 18.0 0.136 0.601 22%
18 Babii, A 2022 3 1 3.0 0.018 0.585 100%
19 Seo, W.-K (self) 2024b 3 3 3.0 0.018 0.585 33%
20 Horvath, L., P. Kokoszka, and R. Reeder 2013 5 5 4.0 0.030 0.585 20%
21 Berkes, I., L. Horvath, and G. Rice 2013 6 4 4.5 0.036 0.550 17%
22 Kilian, L. and H. Lutkepohl 2017 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
23 Carrasco, M., J.-P. Florens, and E. Renault 2007 2 2 2.5 0.012 0.511 50%
24 Chang, Minsu, Chen, Xiaohong, and Schorfheide, Fra... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
25 Koles\`ar, M. and M. Plagborg-M\oller 2024 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
26 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
27 Stock, J. H. and M. W. Watson 2012 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
28 Sims, C. A 1980 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
29 Johansen, S 1991 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
30 Johansen, S 1995 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
31 Fukumizu, K., F. R. Bach, and M. I. Jordan 2004 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
32 Horvath, L., P. Kokoszka, and G. Rice 2014 4 3 2.0 0.024 0.200 0%
33 Hormann, S. and P. Kokoszka 2010 3 3 1.5 0.018 0.182 0%
34 Ibukiyama, T. and M. Kaneko 2014 2 1 1.0 0.012 0.110 0%
35 Chen, C., S. Guo, and X. Qiao 2022 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
36 Stock, J. H. and M. W. Watson 2018 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
37 Benatia, D., M. Carrasco, and J.-P. Florens 2017 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
38 Baker, C. R 1973 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
39 Seo, W.-K (self) 2024a 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
40 Skorohod, A 1983 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
41 Megginson, R. E 2012 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
42 Park, J. Y. and J. Qian 2012 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
43 Horváth, L., G. Rice, and S. Whipple 2016 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.