Citation Analysis

Bayesian inference for dynamic spatial quantile models with interactive effects
Tomohiro Ando, Jushan Bai, Kunpeng Li, Yong Song
https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.00772
49
Citation mentions
40
Cited references
6
Sections
6,080
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Ando, Tomohiro and Bai, Jushan (self) 2020 6 2 9.0 0.122 0.874 100%
2 Yu, J. and de Jong, R. and Lee, L. 2008 3 2 5.0 0.061 0.737 100%
3 Chen, L. and Gonzalo, J. and Dolado, J. 2021 3 2 4.0 0.061 0.737 100%
4 Beenstock, M. and Felsenstein, D. 2015 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
5 Hunneman, A. and Elhorst, J.P. and Bijmolt, T.H.A. 2022 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
6 Glaser, S. and Jung, R.C. and Schweikert, K. 2022 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
7 Bai, Jushan (self) 2009 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
8 Bai, Jushan and Li, Kunpeng (self) 2014 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
9 Ando, Tomohiro and Bai, Jushan (self) 2017 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
10 Hallin, M. and Li\vs 2007 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
11 Moon, H. R. and Weidner, M. 2015 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
12 Pesaran, M.H. 2006 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
13 Stock, J.H. and Watson, M.W. 2002 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
14 Lu, X. and Su, L. 2016 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
15 Aquaro, Michele and Bailey, Natalia and Pesaran, M... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
16 Baltagi, B.H. 2011 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
17 Bai, Jushan and Li, Kunpeng (self) 2021 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
18 Kelejian, H. H. and Prucha, I. R. 2004 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
19 Lee, L. 2004 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
20 Lin, X. and Lee, L. 2010 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
21 Li, K. 2017 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
22 Lu, L. 2017 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
23 Qu, X. and Lee, L.F. 2015 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
24 Reich, B. J. and Fuentes, M. and Dunson, D. B. 2011 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
25 Shi, W. and Lee, L. 2017 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
26 Koenker, R. and Bassett, G. 1978 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
27 Manski, Charles F. 1993 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
28 Anselin, L. 1988 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
29 Koenker, Roger and Xiao, Zhijie 2006 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
30 Bai, Jushan and Li, Kunpeng (self) 2013 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
31 Bai, Jushan and Ng, Serena (self) 2013 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
32 Kozumi, Hideo and Kobayashi, Genya 2011 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
33 Villani, M. 2009 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
34 Malsiner-Walli, G. and Fru 2016 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
35 Mitchell, T.J. and Beauchamp, J.J. 1988 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
36 Green, Peter J 1995 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
37 Barron, A. and Schervish, M. J. and Wasserman, L. 1999 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
38 Ghosal, S. and Ghosh, J. K. and Ramamoorthi, R. V. 1999 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
39 Walker, S. G. and Hjort, N. L. 2001 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
40 Pinkse, J. and Slade, M.E and Brett, C. 2002 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.