← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\bf Empirical likelihood approach for high-dimensional moment restrictions with dependent data
Jinyuan Chang, Qiao Hu, Zhentao Shi, Jia Zhang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.18970
103
Citation mentions
76
Cited references
11
Sections
13,407
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Chang, Jinyuan and Tang, Cheng Yong and Wu, Tong T... (self) 2018 4 3 6.0 0.039 0.928 100%
2 Jinyuan Chang and Song Xi Chen and Cheng Yong Tang... (self) 2021 4 3 6.0 0.039 0.928 100%
3 Ramey, Valerie A and Zubairy, Sarah 2018 6 2 12.0 0.058 0.874 100%
4 Kitamura, Yuichi 1997 3 2 5.0 0.029 0.737 100%
5 Chang, Jinyuan and Tang, Cheng Yong and Zhu, Yuanz... (self) 2025\raisebox{0.5ex 3 2 6.0 0.029 0.737 100%
6 Jorda 2005 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
7 Engle, Robert F and Kroner, Kenneth F 1995 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
8 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
9 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
10 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
11 Jing, Bing-Yi and Shao, Qi-Man and Wang, Qiying 2003 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
12 Chang, Jinyuan and Hu, Qiao and Liu, Cheng and Tan... (self) 2024a 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
13 Xiaohong Chen and Qi-Man Shao and Wei Biao Wu and ... 2016 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
14 Chang, Jinyuan and Shi, Zhentao and Zhang, Jia (self) 2023 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
15 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
16 Belloni, Alexandre and Chernozhukov, Victor and Ch... 2018 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
17 Sumanta Basu and George Michailidis 2015 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
18 Fisher, Irving 1925 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
19 Frisch, Ragnar 1933 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
20 Tinbergen, Jan 1939 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
21 Angrist, Joshua D and Krueger, Alan B 1991 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
22 Jonathan Eaton and Samuel Kortum and Francis Krama... 2011 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
23 Blundell, Richard and Pashardes, Panos and Weber, ... 1993 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
24 Fan, Jianqing and Liao, Yuan 2014 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
25 Lu 2005 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 Sims, Christopher A 1980 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Nakamura, Emi and Steinsson, Jo 2018 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Engle, Robert F 1982 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
29 Bollerslev, Tim 1986 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Hansen, Lars Peter 1982 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Hansen, Lars Peter and Singleton, Kenneth J 1982 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Altonji, Joseph G. and Segal, Lewis M. 1996 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Cheng, Xu and Sa 2023 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
34 Kitamura, Yuichi and Stutzer, Michael 1997 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
35 Newey, Whitney K and Smith, Richard J 2004 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
36 Otsu, Taisuke 2007 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
37 Leng, Chenlei and Tang, Cheng Yong 2012 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 Shi, Zhentao (self) 2016 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
39 Levenbach, Hans 1972 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
40 Stambaugh, Robert F 1997 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
41 Patton, Andrew J 2006 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
42 Chang, Jinyuan and Tang, Cheng Yong and Wu, Yichao (self) 2013 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
43 Chang, Jinyuan and Tang, Cheng Yong and Wu, Yichao (self) 2016 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
44 Shi, Zhentao and Su, Liangjun and Xie, Tian (self) 2024 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
45 Mei, Ziwei and Shi, Zhentao (self) 2024 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
46 Kock, Anders Bredahl and Callot, Laurent 2015 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
47 Caner, Mehmet and Kock, Anders Bredahl 2018 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
48 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
49 Fan, Jianqing and Yao, Qiwei 2003 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
50 Carrasco, Marine and Chen, Xiaohong 2002 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
51 Hafner, Christian M and Preminger, Arie 2009 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
52 Boussama, Farid and Fuchs, Florian and Stelzer, Ro... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
53 Wong, Kam Chung and Li, Zifan and Tewari, Ambuj 2020 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
54 Bradley, Richard C 2005 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
55 A\"\i 2004 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
56 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
57 Tibshirani, R 1996 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
58 Fan, Jianqing and Li, Runze 2001 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
59 Zhang, Cun-Hui (self) 2010 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
60 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
61 Chen, Xiaohong and Chernozhukov, Victor and Lee, S... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
62 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
63 Chen, Jiahua and Chen, Zehua 2008 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
64 Zhang, Cun-Hui and Huang, Jian (self) 2008 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
65 Newey, Whitney K and West, Kenneth D 1987 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
66 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
67 Koh, Kwangmoo and Kim, Seung-Jean and Boyd, Stephe... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
68 Koh, Kwangmoo and Kim, Seung-Jean and Boyd, Stephe... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
69 Kingma, Diederik P and Ba, Jimmy 2015 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
70 Francis X. Diebold and Kamil Yılmaz 2014 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
71 Yao, Sijie and Zou, Hui and Xing, Haipeng 2024 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
72 Dhaene, Geert and Sercu, Piet and Wu, Jianbin 2022 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
73 Rudin, Walter 1976 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
74 Del Moral, Pierre and Niclas, Angele 2018 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
75 Rio, Emmanuel 2017 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
76 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.