← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Imputation Strategies for Rightcensored Wages in Longitudinal Datasets
Jörg Drechsler, Johannes Ludsteck
https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12967
69
Citation mentions
48
Cited references
10
Sections
5,198
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 David Card and J\"o 2013 13 6 21.0 0.188 0.974 92%
2 Dustmann, Christian and Ludsteck, Johannes and Sch... (self) 2009 4 3 6.0 0.058 0.928 100%
3 Gartner, Hermann 2005 2 2 4.0 0.029 0.644 100%
4 Xiao-Li Meng 1994 2 2 2.0 0.029 0.511 50%
5 U.S. Census Bureau 2022 2 1 2.0 0.029 0.511 100%
6 U.S. Census Bureau 2022 2 1 2.0 0.029 0.511 100%
7 Schluter, Christian and Trede, Mark 2023 2 1 4.0 0.029 0.511 100%
8 Victor Chernouzhukov and Han Hong 2002 2 1 4.0 0.029 0.511 100%
9 Wachter, Till von and Bender, Stefan 2006 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
10 Schmieder, Johannes F and von Wachter, Till and Be... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
11 Schmieder, Johannes F and Von Wachter, Till and Be... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
12 Scho 2014 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
13 Dustmann, Christian and Glitz, Albrecht and Scho 2016 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
14 Dustmann, Christian and Scho 2012 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
15 Michael Compson 2011 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
16 Tobin, James 1958 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
17 W.K. Chow 1979 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
18 A. B. Anderson and A. Basilevsky and D. P. J. Hum 1983 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
19 Michael P. Jones 1996 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
20 John Abowd and Francis Kramarz and David Margolis 1999 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
21 Hafner, Hans-Peter and Lenz, Rainer 2008 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
22 Katz, Lawrence F and Murphy, Kevin M 1992 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
23 Lemieux, Thomas 2006 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
24 Autor, David H and Katz, Lawrence F and Kearney, M... 2008 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
25 Fichtenbaum, Rudy and Shahidi, Hushang 1988 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
26 Bishop, John A and Chiou, Jong-Rong and Formby, Jo... 1994 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
27 Bo 2015 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
28 Armour, Philip and Burkhauser, Richard V and Larri... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
29 Jenkins, Stephen P and Burkhauser, Richard V and F... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
30 Ham, John C and Rea Jr, Samuel A 1987 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
31 Haider, Steven and Solon, Gary 2006 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
32 Florian Lehmer and Johannes Ludsteck (self) 2014 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
33 Johannes Ludsteck (self) 2014 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
34 Florian Lehmer and Johannes Ludsteck (self) 2014 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
35 Go 2013 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
36 Gartner, Hermann and Ra 2005 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
37 Jensen, Uwe and Gartner, Hermann and Ra 2010 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
38 Bu 2008 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
39 Bru 2014 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
40 Alexandra Schmucker and Stefan Seth and Philipp vo... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
41 Cheng Hsiao 2003 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
42 Bo Honor\'e 1993 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
43 Roger Koenker and Gilbert Basset 1978 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
44 James Powell 1986 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
45 M. Buchinsky 1994 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
46 S. Khan and J. Powell 2001 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
47 Moshe Buchinsky and Jinyong Hahn 1998 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
48 Bernd Fitzenberger 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.