← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\bf Regression Modeling of the Count Relational Data with Exchangeable Dependencies
Wenqin Du, Bailey K. Fosdick, Wen Zhou
https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11255
110
Citation mentions
69
Cited references
7
Sections
3,164
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Graham, B. S 2020a 6 4 11.0 0.055 1.000 100%
2 Koster, J. M. and Leckie, G 2014 15 4 30.0 0.136 1.000 100%
3 Marrs, F. W., Fosdick, B. K., and McCormick, T. H (self) 2023 4 4 8.0 0.036 0.928 100%
4 Hoff, P. D., Raftery, A. E., and Handcock, M. S 2002 3 3 6.0 0.027 0.843 100%
5 Hoff, P 2021 3 3 6.0 0.027 0.843 100%
6 Gourieroux, C., Monfort, A., and Trognon, A 1984 3 3 5.0 0.027 0.843 100%
7 Graham, B. S 2020b 3 3 5.0 0.027 0.843 100%
8 Silverman, B. W 1976 3 2 6.0 0.027 0.737 100%
9 Pensia, A., Jog, V., and Loh, P.-L 2019 3 2 6.0 0.027 0.737 100%
10 Westveld, A. H. and Hoff, P. D 2011 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
11 Le, C. M. and Li, T 2022 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
12 Warner, R. M., Kenny, D. A., and Stoto, M 1979 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
13 Davis, R. A., Dunsmuir, W. T., and Wang, Y 2000 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
14 Du, W., Zhang, Y., and Zhou, W (self) 2024 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
15 Kenny, D. A. and La Voie, L 1984 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
16 Krivitsky, P. N 2012 2 1 4.0 0.018 0.511 100%
17 Moody, J., Brynildsen, W. D., Osgood, D. W., Feinb... 2011 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
18 Han, X., Wang, Y., and Tong, X 2020 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
19 Aldous, D. J 1985 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
20 Hoff, P. D 2005 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
21 Hoff, P., Fosdick, B., Volfovsky, A., and Stovel, ... (self) 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
22 Zhu, X., Pan, R., Li, G., Liu, Y., and Wang, H 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
23 Kim, B., Lee, K. H., Xue, L., and Niu, X 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Zhang, J., Sun, W. W., and Li, L 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Zhang, Y., Levina, E., and Zhu, J 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Li, T., Levina, E., and Zhu, J 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Harris, K. M 2011 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Banerjee, A., Chandrasekhar, A. G., Duflo, E., and... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Ji, P. and Jin, J 2016 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Dong, W., Pentland, A., and Heller, K. A 2012 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Diesner, J. and Carley, K. M 2005 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Wang, X. and Kockelman, K. M 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Holland, P. W. and Leinhardt, S 1981 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Frank, O. and Strauss, D 1986 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Caimo, A. and Friel, N 2011 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Schmid, C. S. and Desmarais, B. A 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Shalizi, C. R. and Rinaldo, A 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Perry, P. O. and Wolfe, P. J 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Chen, Y., Qu, L., Xu, J., Yan, T., and Zhou, Y (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Li, H. and Loken, E 2002 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Opsahl, T. and Panzarasa, P 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Zhang, Y. and Xia, D 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Graham, B. S 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Dzemski, A 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Chen, M., Fernandez-Val, I., and Weidner, M 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Zhang, J., Sun, W. W., and Li, L 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Minhas, S., Hoff, P. D., and Ward, M. D 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 Zeger, S. L 1988 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 Diggle, P., Diggle, P. J., Heagerty, P., Liang, K.... 2002 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Cranmer, S. J., Heinrich, T., and Desmarais, B. A 2014 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
51 Wong, G. Y 1982 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
52 Gill, P. S. and Swartz, T. B 2001 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
53 Chandrasekhar, A 2016 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
54 Gelman, A. and Hill, J 2006 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
55 Aronow, P. M., Samii, C., and Assenova, V. A 2015 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
56 Graham, B. S., Niu, F., and Powell, J. L 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
57 Besag, J 1975 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
58 Davis, R. A. and Liu, H 2016 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
59 Phillips, P. C. and Moon, H. R 1999 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
60 Lumley, T. and Mayer Hamblett, N 2003 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
61 Tian, Y. and Feng, Y 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
62 Bolthausen, E 1982 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
63 Cairns, S. J. and Schwager, S. J 1987 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
64 Hames, R 1987 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
65 Alvard, M 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
66 DeFrance, S. D 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
67 Helms, M. W 1971 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
68 Parsons, J. J 1974 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
69 Menzel, K 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.