← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

2502.10653
Victor Chernozhukov, Sokbae Lee, Adam M. Rosen, Liyang Sun
https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10653
87
Citation mentions
53
Cited references
15
Sections
4,947
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Chernozhukov, Lee and Rosen (self) 2013 4 3 3.0 0.046 0.928 100%
2 Manski 2021 5 2 4.0 0.057 0.874 100%
3 Kitagawa and Tetenov 2018 4 2 3.5 0.046 0.811 100%
4 Athey and Wager 2021 4 2 5.0 0.046 0.811 100%
5 Andrews and Chen 2025 4 2 2.5 0.046 0.811 100%
6 Ben-Michael, Greiner, Imai and Jiang 2025 3 2 2.0 0.034 0.737 100%
7 Andrews, Kitagawa and McCloskey 2024 2 2 1.5 0.023 0.644 100%
8 Hendren and Sprung-Keyser 2021 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
9 Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Kato and Koike (self) 2022 2 2 4.0 0.023 0.644 100%
10 Chernozhukov, Chetverikov and Koike (self) 2023 2 2 4.0 0.023 0.644 100%
11 Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Kato and Koike (self) 2023 2 2 4.0 0.023 0.644 100%
12 Belloni, Chernozhukov, Chetverikov and Wei (self) 2018 2 2 4.0 0.023 0.644 100%
13 Quintas-Martinez 2022 2 2 4.0 0.023 0.644 100%
14 Hendren and Sprung-Keyser 2020 2 1 2.0 0.023 0.511 100%
15 Sun (self) 2025 2 1 1.0 0.023 0.511 100%
16 Moon 2025 2 1 1.0 0.023 0.511 100%
17 Hendren 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
18 Garc\'\ia and Heckman 2022 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 Salisbury 2024 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Wald 1950 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Manski 2004 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Dehejia 2005 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Stoye 2009 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Hirano and Porter 2009 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Hirano and Porter 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Manski 2023 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Mbakop and Tabord-Meehan 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Demirer, Syrgkanis, Lewis and Chernozhukov (self) 2019 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Belloni, Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Hansen and Kat... (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Maurer and Pontil 2009 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Swaminathan and Joachims 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Foster and Syrgkanis 2023 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Kiyani, Pappas, Roth and Hassani 2025 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Benjamini, Hechtlinger and Stark 2019 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Zrnic and Fithian 2024 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Zrnic and Fithian 2025 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Rai 2019 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Armstrong and Shen 2023 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Ponomarev and Semenova 2024 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Manski 2019 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 Manski 2000 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
42 Russell 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
43 Ishihara and Kitagawa 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
44 Yata 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
45 Christensen, Moon and Schorfheide 2023 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
46 Kido 2023 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
47 Montiel Olea, Qiu and Stoye 2025 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
48 Banerjee, Chandrasekhar, Dalpath, Duflo, Floretta,... 2025 4 2 2.0 0.046 0.175 0%
49 Schilbach 2019 3 2 1.5 0.034 0.159 0%
50 Dupas and Robinson 2013 2 2 1.0 0.023 0.139 0%
51 Doksum and Lo 1990 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
52 Liese and Miescke 2008 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
53 Newey 1994 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.