Citation Analysis – Prioritized Ranking Experimental Design Using Recommender Systems in Two-Sided Platforms

Prioritized Ranking Experimental Design Using Recommender Systems in Two-Sided Platforms
Mahyar Habibi, Zahra Khanalizadeh, Negar Ziaeian
https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09806

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

4,234

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Craswell, Zoeter, Taylor \harvardand\ Ramsey	2008	2	2	3.0	0.051	0.644	100%
2	Johari, Li, Liskovich \harvardand\ Weintraub	2022	2	2	3.0	0.051	0.644	100%
3	Bajari, Burdick, Imbens, Masoero, McQueen, Richard...	2023	2	2	3.0	0.051	0.644	100%
4	Kohavi, Tang \harvardand\ Xu	2020	2	1	2.0	0.051	0.511	100%
5	Bojinov \harvardand\ Gupta	2022	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
6	Xia, Bhardwaj, Dmitriev \harvardand\ Fabijan	2019	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
7	Xu, Duan \harvardand\ Huang	2018	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
8	Kohavi, Crook, Longbotham, Frasca, Henne, Lavista ...	2009	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
9	Rubin	1974	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
10	Imbens \harvardand\ Rubin	2015	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
11	Chamandy	2016	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
12	Choi \harvardand\ Mela	2019	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
13	Blake \harvardand\ Coey	2014	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
14	Fradkin	2019	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
15	Manski	2013	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
16	Munro, Kuang \harvardand\ Wager	2024	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
17	Friedberg, Rajkumar, Mao, Yao, Yu \harvardand\ Liu	2022	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
18	Véliz	2023	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
19	Kahneman, Knetsch \harvardand\ Thaler	1986	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
20	Robins	1986	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
21	Sneider \harvardand\ Tang	2019	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
22	Bojinov, Simchi-Levi \harvardand\ Zhao	2023	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
23	Liu, Li \harvardand\ Hu	2013	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
24	Polonioli, Ghioni, Greco, Juneja, Tagliabue, Watso...	2023	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
25	Saint-Jacques, Sepehri, Li \harvardand\ Perisic	2020	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
26	Ugander, Karrer, Backstrom \harvardand\ Kleinberg	2013	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
27	Eckles, Karrer \harvardand\ Ugander	2017	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
28	Holtz, Lobel, Lobel, Liskovich \harvardand\ Aral	2024	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
29	Candogan, Chen \harvardand\ Niazadeh	2023	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
30	Goli, Lambrecht \harvardand\ Yoganarasimhan	2024	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
31	Zhan, Han, Hu \harvardand\ Jiang	2024	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
32	Nandy, Venugopalan, Lo \harvardand\ Chatterjee	2021	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
33	Ursu	2018	1	1	1.0	0.026	0.406	100%
34	Adam, Hamner, Friedman \harvardand\ SSA\_Expedia	2013	1	1	2.0	0.026	0.406	100%
35	Horvitz \harvardand\ Thompson	1952	1	1	2.0	0.026	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Craswell, Zoeter, Taylor \harvardand\ Ramsey

2008

3.0

0.051

0.644

100%

Johari, Li, Liskovich \harvardand\ Weintraub

2022

3.0

0.051

0.644

100%

Bajari, Burdick, Imbens, Masoero, McQueen, Richard...

2023

3.0

0.051

0.644

100%

Kohavi, Tang \harvardand\ Xu

2020

2.0

0.051

0.511

100%

Bojinov \harvardand\ Gupta

2022

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Xia, Bhardwaj, Dmitriev \harvardand\ Fabijan

2019

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Xu, Duan \harvardand\ Huang

2018

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Kohavi, Crook, Longbotham, Frasca, Henne, Lavista ...

2009

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Rubin

1974

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Imbens \harvardand\ Rubin

2015

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Chamandy

2016

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Choi \harvardand\ Mela

2019

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Blake \harvardand\ Coey

2014

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Fradkin

2019

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Manski

2013

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Munro, Kuang \harvardand\ Wager

2024

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Friedberg, Rajkumar, Mao, Yao, Yu \harvardand\ Liu

2022

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Véliz

2023

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Kahneman, Knetsch \harvardand\ Thaler

1986

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Robins

1986

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Sneider \harvardand\ Tang

2019

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Bojinov, Simchi-Levi \harvardand\ Zhao

2023

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Liu, Li \harvardand\ Hu

2013

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Polonioli, Ghioni, Greco, Juneja, Tagliabue, Watso...

2023

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Saint-Jacques, Sepehri, Li \harvardand\ Perisic

2020

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Ugander, Karrer, Backstrom \harvardand\ Kleinberg

2013

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Eckles, Karrer \harvardand\ Ugander

2017

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Holtz, Lobel, Lobel, Liskovich \harvardand\ Aral

2024

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Candogan, Chen \harvardand\ Niazadeh

2023

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Goli, Lambrecht \harvardand\ Yoganarasimhan

2024

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Zhan, Han, Hu \harvardand\ Jiang

2024

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Nandy, Venugopalan, Lo \harvardand\ Chatterjee

2021

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Ursu

2018

1.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Adam, Hamner, Friedman \harvardand\ SSA\_Expedia

2013

2.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Horvitz \harvardand\ Thompson

1952

2.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.