← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

High-dimensional censored MIDAS logistic regression for corporate survival forecasting
Wei Miao, Jad Beyhum, Jonas Striaukas, Ingrid Van Keilegom
https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09740
137
Citation mentions
64
Cited references
17
Sections
19,195
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Babii, Andrii and Ghysels, Eric and Striaukas, Jon... (self) 2022 11 6 20.0 0.080 1.000 100%
2 Caner, Mehmet 2023 8 4 14.0 0.058 1.000 100%
3 van de Geer, Sara and Peter Bühlmann and Ya'acov R... 2014 11 3 17.5 0.080 0.969 91%
4 Babii, Andrii and Ball, Ryan T and Ghysels, Eric a... (self) 2023 6 3 8.5 0.044 0.941 83%
5 Han, Yuefeng and Tsay, Ruey S and Wu, Wei Biao 2023 4 3 7.0 0.029 0.928 100%
6 van de Geer, Sara 2016 9 6 12.5 0.066 0.874 67%
7 Heagerty, Patrick J and Lumley, Thomas and Pepe, M... 2000 6 2 12.0 0.044 0.874 100%
8 van de Geer, Sara 2008 3 3 5.0 0.022 0.843 100%
9 Blanche, Paul Fre 2023 3 2 5.0 0.022 0.737 100%
10 Audrino, Francesco and Kostrov, Alexander and Orte... 2019 3 2 4.0 0.022 0.737 100%
11 Liang, Xiaoxuan and Cohen, Aaron and Heinsfeld, An... 2024 3 3 4.5 0.022 0.737 67%
12 Altman, Edward I 1968 3 2 6.0 0.022 0.737 100%
13 Almon, Shirley 1965 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
14 Ghysels, Eric and Sinko, Arthur and Valkanov, Ross... 2007 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
15 Li, Shaobo and Tian, Shaonan and Yu, Yan and Zhu, ... 2023 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
16 Hebiri, Mohamed and Lederer, Johannes 2012 2 2 4.0 0.015 0.644 100%
17 Arnak S. Dalalyan and Mohamed Hebiri and Johannes ... 2017 2 2 4.0 0.015 0.644 100%
18 Li, Chunyu and Lou, Chenxin and Luo, Dan and Xing,... 2021 2 2 4.0 0.015 0.644 100%
19 Petropoulos, Anastasios and Siakoulis, Vasilis and... 2020 2 1 2.0 0.015 0.511 100%
20 Tibshirani, Robert 1996 2 1 4.0 0.015 0.511 100%
21 Simon, Noah and Friedman, Jerome and Hastie, Trevo... 2013 2 1 4.0 0.015 0.511 100%
22 Lo, Shaw-Hwa and Singh, Kesar 1986 3 2 3.0 0.022 0.511 33%
23 Akritas, Michael G 1994 2 1 4.0 0.015 0.511 100%
24 Altman, Edward I and Iwanicz-Drozdowska, Ma\l 2017 2 1 4.0 0.015 0.511 100%
25 Ohlson, James A 1980 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
26 Shumway, Tyler 2001 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
27 Duffie, Darrell and Saita, Leandro and Wang, Ke 2007 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
28 Barboza, Flavio and Kimura, Herbert and Altman, Ed... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
29 Ding, A Adam and Tian, Shaonan and Yu, Yan and Guo... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
30 Lee, Ming-Chang 2014 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
31 Kim, Maria Heui-Yeong and Ma, Shiguang and Zhou, Y... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
32 Zhou, Fanyin and Fu, Lijun and Li, Zhiyong and Xu,... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
33 Barbaglia, Luca and Manzan, Sebastiano and Tosetti... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
34 Jiang, Cuixia and Xiong, Wei and Xu, Qifa and Liu,... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
35 Meier, Lukas and van de Geer, Sara and Bu 2008 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
36 Bu 2011 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
37 D. G. Horvitz and D. J. Thompson 1952 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
38 Zheng, Yingye and Cai, Tianxi and Feng, Ziding 2006 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
39 Beyhum, Jad and Tedesco, Lorenzo and Van Keilegom,... (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
40 Beyhum, Jad and Centorrino, Samuele and Florens, J... (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
41 Kaplan, Edward L and Meier, Paul 1958 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
42 Ghysels, Eric and Santa-Clara, Pedro and Valkanov,... 2006 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
43 Yuan, Ming and Lin, Yi 2006 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
44 Belloni, Alexandre and Chernozhukov, Victor and Ch... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
45 van de Geer, Sara and Peter Bu 2009 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
46 Peter J. Bickel and Ya’acov Ritov and Alexandre B.... 2009 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
47 Gill, Richard D 2006 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
48 Therneau, Terry 2015 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
49 Ghysels, Eric and Qian, Hang 2019 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
50 Cai, Tianxi and Pepe, Margaret Sullivan and Zheng,... 2006 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
51 Heagerty, Patrick J and Zheng, Yingye 2005 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
52 Amico, M and Van Keilegom, I and Han, B (self) 2020 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
53 Cai, Tianxi and Gerds, Thomas A and Zheng, Yingye ... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
54 Hung, HUNG and Chiang, CHIN-TSANG 2010 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
55 Blanche, Paul and Dartigues, Jean-Fran\cc 2013 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
56 Kamarudin, Adina Najwa and Cox, Trevor and Kolamun... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
57 Chardon, Hugo and Lerasle, Matthieu and Mourtada, ... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
58 Cole, Rebel A and White, Lawrence J 2012 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
59 James A. Hanley, Barbara J. McNeil 1983 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
60 Robin, Xavier and Turck, Natacha and Hainard, Alex... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
61 Chernozhukov, Victor and Chetverikov, Denis and Ka... 2019 2 1 1.0 0.015 0.110 0%
62 Bose, Arup and Chatterjee, Snigdhansu 2018 2 1 1.0 0.015 0.110 0%
63 van de Geer, Sara and Alan Muro 2014 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
64 Gill, Richard 1983 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.