← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\Large Estimating Parameters of Structural Models Using Neural Networks\vspace1.5em
Yanhao, Wei, Zhenling Jiang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04945
66
Citation mentions
43
Cited references
11
Sections
7,697
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Ursu 2018 9 4 18.0 0.136 1.000 100%
2 White 1990 4 3 3.5 0.061 0.737 50%
3 Chen 2007 4 3 3.5 0.061 0.737 50%
4 Farrell, Liang and Misra 2021 3 3 3.0 0.045 0.737 67%
5 Chen and Liao 2015 2 2 3.0 0.030 0.644 100%
6 Newey 2007 2 2 3.0 0.030 0.644 100%
7 Kim 2002 2 2 4.0 0.030 0.644 100%
8 Weitzman 1979 2 2 4.0 0.030 0.644 100%
9 White 1989 2 2 1.0 0.030 0.511 50%
10 Gourieroux, Monfort and Renault 1993 2 1 1.0 0.030 0.511 100%
11 Geweke and Keane 2001 2 1 4.0 0.030 0.511 100%
12 Timoshenko and Hauser 2019 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
13 Liu, Lee and Srinivasan 2019 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
14 Chiong and Shum 2019 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
15 Zhu, Simester, Parker and Schoar 2020 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
16 Yoganarasimhan 2020 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
17 Zhang and Luo 2023 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
18 Yoganarasimhan, Barzegary and Pani 2023 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
19 Athey 2018 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
20 Lewis and Syrgkanis 2018 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
21 Wager and Athey 2018 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
22 Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Demirer, Duflo, Hansen,... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
23 Farrell, Liang and Misra 2021 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
24 Kaji, Manresa and Pouliot 2023 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
25 Lee and Ogburn 2021 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
26 Graham 2020 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
27 Bajari, Benkard and Levin 2007 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
28 Pakes, Ostrovsky and Berry 2007 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
29 Su and Judd 2012 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
30 Collard-Wexler 2013 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
31 Bao and Ni 2017 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
32 Smith 2008 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
33 Bruins, Duffy, Keane and Smith Jr 2018 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
34 Andersen and Sorensen 1996 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
35 Altonji and Segal 1996 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
36 Breusch, Qian, Schmidt and Wyhowski 1999 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
37 Donald and Newey 2021 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
38 Dauphin, Pascanu, Gulcehre, Cho, Ganguli and Bengi... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
39 Li, Xu, Taylor, Studer and Goldstein 2018 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
40 Du, Lee, Li, Wang and Zhai 2019 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
41 Gelman, Carlin, Stern and Rubin 2004 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
42 White 1982 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
43 Hornik, Stinchcombe and White 1989 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.