Citation Analysis

\textbfKotlarski's lemma for dyadic models
Grigory Franguridi, Hyungsik Roger Moon
https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02734
20
Citation mentions
11
Cited references
4
Sections
1,631
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Evdokimov, Kirill and White, Halbert 2012 8 4 14.0 0.400 0.957 88%
2 Kotlarski, Ignacy 1967 3 3 4.0 0.150 0.737 67%
3 Li, Tong and Vuong, Quang 1998 1 1 1.0 0.050 0.406 100%
4 Li, Tong 2002 1 1 1.0 0.050 0.406 100%
5 Schennach, Susanne M 2004 1 1 1.0 0.050 0.406 100%
6 Kurisu, Daisuke and Otsu, Taisuke 2022 1 1 1.0 0.050 0.406 100%
7 Bonhomme, Ste 2010 1 1 1.0 0.050 0.406 100%
8 Botosaru, Irene and Sasaki, Yuya 2018 1 1 1.0 0.050 0.406 100%
9 Hu, Yingyao and Moffitt, Robert and Sasaki, Yuya 2019 1 1 1.0 0.050 0.406 100%
10 Kato, Kengo and Sasaki, Yuya and Ura, Takuya 2021 1 1 1.0 0.050 0.406 100%
11 Schennach, Susanne M 2016 1 1 1.0 0.050 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.