Citation Analysis

Confidence intervals for intentionally biased estimators
David M. Kaplan, Xin Liu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.00450
75
Citation mentions
37
Cited references
12
Sections
2,736
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 5 3 8.0 0.067 1.000 100%
2 5 3 9.0 0.067 1.000 100%
3 6 3 11.0 0.080 1.000 100%
4 6 4 9.0 0.080 1.000 100%
5 4 3 6.0 0.053 0.928 100%
6 4 3 6.0 0.053 0.928 100%
7 5 2 10.0 0.067 0.874 100%
8 3 2 5.0 0.040 0.737 100%
9 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
10 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
11 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
12 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
13 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
14 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
15 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
16 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
17 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
18 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
19 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
20 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
21 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
22 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
23 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
24 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
25 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
26 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
27 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
28 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
29 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
30 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
31 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
32 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
33 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
34 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
35 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
36 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
37 4 1 4.0 0.053 0.139 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.