← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\textbf\Large IV Estimation of Heterogeneous Spatial Dynamic Panel Models with Interactive Effects
Jia Chen, Guowei Cui, Vasilis Sarafidis, Takashi Yamagata
https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18467
107
Citation mentions
69
Cited references
9
Sections
6,757
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Norkut\.e, M., Sarafidis, V., Yamagata, T., Cui, G (self) 2021 11 6 19.0 0.103 1.000 100%
2 Bai, J 2003 5 4 9.0 0.047 1.000 100%
3 Cui, G., Sarafidis, V., Yamagata, T (self) 2023 4 3 7.0 0.037 0.928 100%
4 Pesaran, M.H 2006 4 3 7.0 0.037 0.928 100%
5 Bai, J 2009 3 3 6.0 0.028 0.843 100%
6 Elhorst, P., Tziolas, I., Tan, C., Milionis, P 2024 4 2 8.0 0.037 0.811 100%
7 Chen, J., Shin, Y., Zheng, C (self) 2022 3 2 4.0 0.028 0.737 100%
8 Manski, C 1993 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
9 Lee, L-F., Yu, J 2014 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
10 Elhorst, P 2014 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
11 Robertson, D., Symons, J 1992 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
12 Pesaran, M.H., Smith, R 1995 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
13 Kripfganz, S., Sarafidis, V (self) 2025 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
14 Ertur, C., Coch, W 2007 3 1 6.0 0.028 0.585 100%
15 Higgins, H., Martellosio, F 2023 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
16 Hansen, C 2007 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
17 LeSage, J.P., Pace, R.K 2009 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
18 Hamermesh, D. S 2015 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
19 Jappelli, T., Pistaferri, L 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
20 Case, S 1991 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
21 Bramoulle, Y., Djebbari, H., Fortin, B 2009 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
22 Sarafidis, V., Wansbeek, T (self) 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
23 Hahn, J., Kuersteiner, G 2002 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Alvarez, J., Arellano, M 2003 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Hayakawa, K 2015 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Chudik, A., Pesaran, H. M 2015 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Moon, R.H., Weidner, M 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 De Vos, I., Everaert, G 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Juodis, A., Sarafidis, V (self) 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Yu, J., de Jong, R., Lee, L-F 2008 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Korniotis, G.M 2010 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Lee, L-F., Yu, J 2015 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Shi, W., Lee, L.F 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Bai, J., Li, K.P 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 LeSage, J.P., Chih, Y-Y 2016 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 De Paula, A 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Lam, C., Souza, P.C.L 2020 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 De Paula, A., Rasul, I., Souza, P. C.L 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 De Vos, I., Everaert, G., Sarafidis, V (self) 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Aquaro, M., Bailey, N., Pesaran, M.H 2015 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Sarafidis, V., Wansbeek, T (self) 2012 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Elhorst, P 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Nickell, S 1981 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Phillips, P.C.B., Sul, D 2007 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Kelejian, H., Piras, G 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Jing, Z., Elhorst, J.P., Jakobs, J., de Haan J 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Bai, J., Ng, S 2002 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 Ahn, S.C., Horenstein, A.R 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 Kelejian, H.H., Prucha, I.R 2001 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Kelejian, H.H., Prucha, I.R 2010 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
51 Wooldridge, J 2002 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
52 Cui, G., Norkut\.e, M., Sarafidis, V., Yamagata, T (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
53 Harding, M., Lamarche, C 2011 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
54 Kapoor, M., Kelejian, H.H., Prucha, I.R 2007 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
55 Sargent, T., Sims, C 1977 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
56 Juodis, A., Sarafidis, V (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
57 Audretsch, D.B., Feldman, M.P 2004 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
58 Autant-Bernard, C., LeSage, J.P 2011 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
59 Botazzi, L., Peri, G 2003 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
60 Rodriguez-Pose, A., Crescenzi, R 2008 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
61 Funke, M., Niebuhr, A 2005 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
62 Ramajo, J., Marquez, M.A., Hewings, G.J.D., Salina... 2008 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
63 Benos, N., Karagiannis, S., Karkalakos, S 2015 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
64 Ozyurt, S., Dees, S 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
65 Di Vaio, G., Zeira, J., Battisti, M 2014 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
66 Islam, N 1995 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
67 Yu, J., de Jong, R., Lee, L-F 2012 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
68 Kripfganz, S., Sarafidis, V (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
69 Debarsy, N., LeSage, J.P., Pace, R.K 2012 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.