← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Universal Inference for Incomplete Discrete Choice Models
Hiroaki Kaido, Yi Zhang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17973
111
Citation mentions
67
Cited references
9
Sections
4,554
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Wasserman, L., A. Ramdas, and S. Balakrishnan 2020 11 7 14.5 0.099 0.935 82%
2 Kaido, H. and Y. Zhang (self) 2019 5 3 6.5 0.045 0.928 80%
3 Philippe, F., G. Debs, and J.-Y. Jaffray 1999 4 3 6.5 0.036 0.843 75%
4 Bresnahan, T. F. and P. C. Reiss 1990 3 3 3.5 0.027 0.737 67%
5 Chesher, A., A. M. Rosen, and Y. Zhang (self) 2024 3 2 5.0 0.027 0.737 100%
6 Barseghyan, L., M. Coughlin, F. Molinari, and J. C... 2021 3 2 4.0 0.027 0.737 100%
7 Chernozhukov, V., S. Lee, and A. M. Rosen 2013 3 2 4.5 0.027 0.737 100%
8 Kaido, H. and F. Molinari (self) 2024 3 2 3.0 0.027 0.737 100%
9 Bugni, F., I. Canay, and X. Shi 2017 3 2 4.5 0.027 0.737 100%
10 Honore, B. E. and E. Tamer 2006 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
11 Chesher, A. and A. M. Rosen 2017 2 2 1.5 0.018 0.644 100%
12 Haile, P. A. and E. Tamer 2003 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
13 Fack, G., J. Grenet, and Y. He 2019 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
14 Chernozhukov, V., H. Hong, and E. Tamer 2007 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
15 Epstein, L. G., H. Kaido, and K. Seo (self) 2016 2 2 1.5 0.018 0.644 100%
16 Tamer, E. 2003 2 2 2.5 0.018 0.644 100%
17 Galichon, A. and M. Henry 2011 2 2 2.5 0.018 0.644 100%
18 Beresteanu, A., I. Molchanov, and F. Molinari 2011 2 2 2.5 0.018 0.644 100%
19 Andrews, D. W. and X. Shi 2013 2 2 2.5 0.018 0.644 100%
20 Han, S. and H. Kaido (self) 2024 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
21 Li, L. and M. Henry 2022 2 1 1.0 0.018 0.511 100%
22 Canay, I. A. and A. M. Shaikh 2017 2 1 1.0 0.018 0.511 100%
23 Cox, G. and X. Shi 2022 2 1 1.0 0.018 0.511 100%
24 Andrews, I., J. Roth, and A. Pakes 2023 2 1 1.0 0.018 0.511 100%
25 Ciliberto, F. and E. Tamer 2009 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Berry, S. T. and G. Compiani 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Miyauchi, Y. 2016 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Sheng, S. 2020 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Eizenberg, A. 2014 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Dickstein, M. J. and E. Morales 2018 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Bjorn, P. A. and Q. H. Vuong 1984 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Bajari, P., H. Hong, and S. P. Ryan 2010 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Andrews, D. W. and G. Soares 2010 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Wald, A. 1950 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Jovanovic, B. 1989 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Horowitz, J. L. and S. Lee 2023 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Kaido, H., F. Molinari, and J. Stoye (self) 2019 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Hahn, J. and H. R. Moon 2010 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Epstein, L. and K. Seo 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Powell, J. L. 1994 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Chen, X., E. T. Tamer, and A. Torgovitsky 2011 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Chen, X., T. M. Christensen, and E. Tamer 2018 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Artstein, Z. 1983 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Molchanov, I. and F. Molinari 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Manski, C. F. and E. Tamer 2002 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 1991 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Khan, S., M. Ponomareva, and E. Tamer 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 Andrews, D. W. and W. Ploberger 1994 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 Elliott, G., U. K. Muller, and M. W. Watson 2015 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Luo, Y., K. Ponomarev, and H. Wang 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
51 Berry, S. and E. Tamer 2006 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
52 Lehmann, E. L. and J. P. Romano 2006 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
53 Choquet, G. 1954 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
54 Molchanov, I. 2006 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
55 Huber, P. J. 1981 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
56 Dempster, A. P. 1967 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
57 Shafer, G. 1982 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
58 Gul, F. and W. Pesendorfer 2014 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
59 Epstein, L. G. and K. Seo 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
60 Huber, P. J. and V. Strassen 1973 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
61 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
62 Montes, I., E. Miranda, and P. Vicig 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
63 Ritzwoller, D. M. and J. P. Romano 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
64 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.087 0%
65 Denneberg, D. 1994 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
66 Schmeidler, D. 1986 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
67 Berry, S. T. 1992 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.