Citation Analysis

\textbf\textsfScale-Insensitive Neural Network Significance Tests
Hasan Fallahgoul
https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15753
86
Citation mentions
18
Cited references
14
Sections
8,387
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Horel, Enguerrand and Giesecke, Kay 2020 11 8 19.0 0.128 1.000 100%
2 Fallahgoul, Hasan and Franstianto, Vincentius and ... (self) 2024 16 8 28.0 0.186 1.000 100%
3 Farrell, Max H and Liang, Tengyuan and Misra, Sanj... 2021 29 7 41.0 0.337 0.952 86%
4 Koltchinskii, V. and Panchenko, D. 2000 3 3 5.0 0.035 0.843 100%
5 Bartlett, P. L. and Bousquet, O. and Mendelson, S. 2005 3 3 5.0 0.035 0.843 100%
6 Yarotsky, Dmitry 2017 3 2 5.0 0.035 0.737 100%
7 Yarotsky, Dmitry 2018 3 2 5.0 0.035 0.737 100%
8 Ian Goodfellow and Yoshua Bengio and Aaron Courvil... 2016 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
9 M. Anthony and P. L. Bartlett 1999 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
10 van der Vaart, Aad W. and Wellner, Jon A. 1996 5 4 3.0 0.058 0.585 20%
11 Koltchinskii, V. 2011 2 2 2.5 0.023 0.511 50%
12 Gine 2021 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
13 Zhang, Chiyuan and Bengio, Samy and Hardt, Moritz ... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
14 Bartlett, Peter L and Harvey, Nick and Liaw, Chris... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
15 Evans, Lawrence C. 2010 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
16 DeVore, Ronald A. and Lorentz, George G. 1993 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
17 DeVore, Ronald A. and Howard, Ronald and Micchelli... 1989 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
18 Boucheron, Ste 2013 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.