Citation Analysis

A Non-Parametric Approach to Heterogeneity Analysis
Avner Seror
https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.13721
32
Citation mentions
15
Cited references
8
Sections
6,772
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Crawford, Ian and Pendakur, Krishna 2012 4 3 6.0 0.125 0.928 100%
2 Federico Echenique and Sangmok Lee and Matthew Shu... 2011 3 2 5.0 0.094 0.737 100%
3 Cosaert, Sam 2019 3 2 4.0 0.094 0.737 100%
4 Houtman, M and Maks, J 1985 2 2 3.0 0.062 0.644 100%
5 Demuynck, Thomas and Rehbeck, John 2023 2 2 3.0 0.062 0.644 100%
6 Jan Heufer and Per Hjertstrand 2015 2 2 3.0 0.062 0.644 100%
7 David R. Bell and James M. Lattin 1998 2 2 3.0 0.062 0.644 100%
8 Matthew Shum 2 2 3.0 0.062 0.644 100%
9 Hendel, Igal and Nevo, Aviv 2006 2 2 3.0 0.062 0.644 100%
10 Hendel, Igal and Nevo, Aviv 2006 2 2 3.0 0.062 0.644 100%
11 Cherchye, Laurens and Saelens, Dieter and Tuncer, ... 2024 3 1 3.0 0.094 0.585 100%
12 S. N. Afriat 1967 2 1 4.0 0.062 0.511 100%
13 Smeulders, Bart and Spieksma, Frits C. R. and Cher... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.031 0.406 100%
14 Miao, Bin and Yang, Shuangyu and Zhong, Songfa 2025 1 1 1.0 0.031 0.406 100%
15 Hal R. Varian 1982 1 1 2.0 0.031 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.