Citation Analysis

The Causal Impact of Dean's List Recognition on Academic Performance: Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design
Luc, Chen
https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09763
18
Citation mentions
15
Cited references
8
Sections
4,866
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Lindo, Jason M and Sanders, Nicholas J and Oreopou... 2010 3 2 5.0 0.167 0.737 100%
2 Angrist, Joshua and Lang, Daniel and Oreopoulos, P... 2009 2 1 4.0 0.111 0.511 100%
3 Oreopoulos, Philip and Petronijevic, Uros 2013 1 1 1.0 0.056 0.406 100%
4 Veerasamy, Ashok Kumar and D'Souza, Daryl and Lind... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.056 0.406 100%
5 Pintrich, Paul R 2004 1 1 1.0 0.056 0.406 100%
6 Bliven, AnnaMaria and Jungbauer, Michelle 2021 1 1 1.0 0.056 0.406 100%
7 Canbolat, Yusuf 2021 1 1 1.0 0.056 0.406 100%
8 Fletcher, Jason M and Tokmouline, Mansur 2017 1 1 0.5 0.056 0.406 100%
9 Ash, Jennifer and Swanson, Elise and Ritter, Gary 2021 1 1 0.5 0.056 0.406 100%
10 Leuven, Edwin and Oosterbeek, Hessel and Van der K... 2010 1 1 0.5 0.056 0.406 100%
11 Lavy, Victor and Sand, Edith 2018 1 1 0.5 0.056 0.406 100%
12 Seaver, W Burleigh and Quarton, Richard J 1976 1 1 0.5 0.056 0.406 100%
13 Angrist, Joshua and Lavy, Victor 2002 1 1 0.5 0.056 0.406 100%
14 Cismaru, Diana-Maria and Corbu, Nicoleta and Frunz... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.056 0.406 100%
15 Hu, Rui and Wang, Yiwei and others 2025 1 1 2.0 0.056 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.