← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Social and Genetic Ties Drive Skewed Cross-Border Media Coverage of Disasters
Thiemo Fetzer, Prashant Garg
https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.07615
111
Citation mentions
75
Cited references
8
Sections
7,872
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Hoffman, M. L. 2001 4 2 6.0 0.036 0.811 100%
2 Beck, Ulrich 2009 3 2 5.0 0.027 0.737 100%
3 IPCC 2018 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
4 Field, C. B. and Barros, V. and Stocker, T. F. and... 2012 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
5 Coumou, Dim and Rahmstorf, Stefan 2012 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
6 Boykoff, Maxwell T 2009 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
7 Doulton, Hugh and Brown, Katrina 2009 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
8 Painter, J. 2013 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
9 Pralle, S. 2009 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
10 McCombs, M. 2004 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
11 Soroka, S. and Young, L. and Balmas, M. 2019 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
12 Zhuravskaya, E. and Petrova, M. and Enikolopov, R. 2020 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
13 Prat, A. and Strömberg, D. 2011 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
14 Hulme, M. 2009 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
15 Batson, C. D. 2011 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
16 de Waal, F. 2009 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
17 Tomasello, M. 2019 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
18 Decety, J. and Cowell, J. M. 2014 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
19 Goleman, D. 1995 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
20 Atkinson, Martin and Van der Goot, Erik 2009 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
21 Steinberger, Ralf and Pouliquen, Bruno and Van der... 2013 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
22 Guha-Sapir, D. 2021 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
23 Below, Regina and Wirtz, Angelika and Guha-Sapir, ... 2009 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
24 Bruno Pelegrino and Enrico Spolaore and Romain Wac... 2024 4 1 8.0 0.036 0.644 100%
25 Falk, Armin and Becker, Anke and Dohmen, Thomas an... 2018 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
26 Stojkoski, Viktor and Koch, Philipp and Coll, Eva ... 2024 3 1 6.0 0.027 0.585 100%
27 Gentzkow, Matthew and Shapiro, Jesse M 2 1 2.0 0.018 0.511 100%
28 DellaVigna, Stefano and Kaplan, Ethan 2007 2 1 2.0 0.018 0.511 100%
29 2 1 2.0 0.018 0.511 100%
30 Bailey, Michael and Cao, Rachel and Kuchler, There... 2018 2 1 4.0 0.018 0.511 100%
31 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Legg, Stephen 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Mike S Scha 2015 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Gavin, Neil T 2009 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Scha 2018 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Entman, Robert M 2009 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Jacquet, Guillaume and Verile, Marco 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 O'Neill, Saffron J and Smith, Nicholas 2014 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Simpson, Brent and Willer, Robb 2015 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Choi, Jung-Kyoo and Bowles, Samuel 2007 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Merkley, Eric and Stecula, Dominik A. 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Rinscheid, Adrian and Pianta, Silvia and Weber, El... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Schmidt, A. and Ivanova, A. and Schäfer, M. S. 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Moser, S. C. 2010 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Dryzek, John S and Norgaard, Richard B and Schlosb... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Stevenson, Hayley and Dryzek, John S 2012 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 Moser, Susanne C 2016 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 Lacy, S. and Fico, F. and Simon, T. 2001 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Galtung, Johan and Ruge, Mari Holmboe 1965 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
51 Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin and Hanitzsch, Thomas 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
52 Harcup, T. and O'Neill, D. 2001 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
53 Kearney, G. and others 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
54 Decety, Jean and Ickes, William 2011 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
55 Brewer, Marilynn B 2007 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
56 Bloom, Paul 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
57 Burchardi, Konrad B and Chaney, Thomas and Hassan,... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
58 Bahar, Dany and Rapoport, Hillel 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
59 Nye, Joseph S 2004 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
60 Petrova, M. 2011 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
61 Fan, Y. 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
62 Jones, B. and Andrei, S. and Doyle, M. and Mumuni,... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
63 Allcott, H. and Gentzkow, M. 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
64 Vosoughi, S. and Roy, D. and Aral, S. 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
65 Garg, Prashant and Fetzer, Thiemo (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
66 Boykoff, M. T. 2011 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
67 Moser, Susanne C 2007 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
68 Conte, Maddalena and Cotterlaz, Pierre and Mayer, ... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
69 Inglehart, Ronald and Haerpfer, Christian and More... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
70 Welzel, Christian 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
71 Pemberton, Trevor J and DeGiorgio, Michael and Ros... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
72 Andre, Pierre and Boneva, Teodora and Chopra, Farz... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
73 Besley, Timothy and Fetzer, Thiemo and Mueller, Ha... (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
74 Wright, Marvin N and Ziegler, Andreas 2015 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
75 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.