Citation Analysis – Identification and Estimation of Simultaneous Equation Models Using Higher-Order Cumulant Restrictions

Identification and Estimation of Simultaneous Equation Models Using Higher-Order Cumulant Restrictions
Ziyu Jiang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.06777

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

12,800

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Richard Davis and Serena Ng	2023	7	3	14.0	0.109	1.000	100%
2	Bonhomme, Ste	2009	3	2	5.0	0.047	0.737	100%
3	Ludvigson, Sydney C and Ma, Sai and Ng, Serena	2021	6	1	12.0	0.094	0.693	100%
4	Markku Lanne and Mika Meitz and Pentti Saikkonen	2017	2	2	3.0	0.031	0.644	100%
5	Hyva	2013	2	2	3.0	0.031	0.644	100%
6	Angus Deaton	1988	2	2	4.0	0.031	0.644	100%
7	Card, David	1993	4	1	8.0	0.062	0.644	100%
8	Lewis, Daniel J	2021	3	1	6.0	0.047	0.585	100%
9	Peter McCullagh	1984	2	1	4.0	0.031	0.511	100%
10	Card, David	2001	2	1	4.0	0.031	0.511	100%
11	Angelini, Giovanni and Bacchiocchi, Emanuele and C...	2019	2	1	4.0	0.031	0.511	100%
12	Jerry A. Hausman	1983	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
13	Rigobon, Roberto	2003	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
14	Markku Lanne and Helmut Lütkepohl and Katarzyna Ma...	2010	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
15	Lewis, Daniel J.	2025	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
16	R. C. Geary	1941	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
17	Olav Reiersøl	1950	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
18	Pierre Comon	1994	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
19	Hyvarinen, A.	1999	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
20	Aiyou Chen and Peter J. Bickel	2006	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
21	Lanne, Markku and Luoto, Jani	2021	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
22	Guay, Alain	2021	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
23	Mesters, Geert and Zwiernik, Piotr	2024	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
24	Jammalamadaka, Sreenivasa and Taufer, Emanuele and...	2021	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
25	Gourie	2017	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
26	Ying Chen and Wolfgang Härdle and Vladimir Spokoin...	2010	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
27	Shimizu, Shohei and Hoyer, Patrik O and Hyva	2006	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
28	Cardoso, Jean-Fran\cc	1993	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
29	Yeredor, A.	2002	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
30	Tichavsky, Petr and Yeredor, Arie	2009	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
31	Ziehe, Andreas and Laskov, Pavel and Nolte, Guido ...	2004	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
32	Stewart, G.W. and Sun, J.	1990	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
33	Kato, T.	1995	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
34	Jan R. Magnus	1985	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
35	Moneta, Alessio and Pallante, Gianluca	2022	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
36	Stephen V. Cameron and Christopher Taber	2004	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
37	Heckman, James J. and Stixrud, Jora and Urzua, Ser...	2006	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
38	Jensen, A.R.	1998	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
39	Baker, Scott R. and Bloom, Nicholas and Davis, Ste...	2016	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
40	Montiel Olea, José Luis and Plagborg-Møller, Mikke...	2022	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Richard Davis and Serena Ng

2023

14.0

0.109

1.000

100%

Bonhomme, Ste

2009

5.0

0.047

0.737

100%

Ludvigson, Sydney C and Ma, Sai and Ng, Serena

2021

12.0

0.094

0.693

100%

Markku Lanne and Mika Meitz and Pentti Saikkonen

2017

3.0

0.031

0.644

100%

Hyva

2013

3.0

0.031

0.644

100%

Angus Deaton

1988

4.0

0.031

0.644

100%

Card, David

1993

8.0

0.062

0.644

100%

Lewis, Daniel J

2021

6.0

0.047

0.585

100%

Peter McCullagh

1984

4.0

0.031

0.511

100%

Card, David

2001

4.0

0.031

0.511

100%

Angelini, Giovanni and Bacchiocchi, Emanuele and C...

2019

4.0

0.031

0.511

100%

Jerry A. Hausman

1983

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Rigobon, Roberto

2003

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Markku Lanne and Helmut Lütkepohl and Katarzyna Ma...

2010

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Lewis, Daniel J.

2025

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

R. C. Geary

1941

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Olav Reiersøl

1950

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Pierre Comon

1994

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Hyvarinen, A.

1999

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Aiyou Chen and Peter J. Bickel

2006

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Lanne, Markku and Luoto, Jani

2021

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Guay, Alain

2021

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Mesters, Geert and Zwiernik, Piotr

2024

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Jammalamadaka, Sreenivasa and Taufer, Emanuele and...

2021

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Gourie

2017

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Ying Chen and Wolfgang Härdle and Vladimir Spokoin...

2010

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Shimizu, Shohei and Hoyer, Patrik O and Hyva

2006

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Cardoso, Jean-Fran\cc

1993

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Yeredor, A.

2002

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Tichavsky, Petr and Yeredor, Arie

2009

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Ziehe, Andreas and Laskov, Pavel and Nolte, Guido ...

2004

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Stewart, G.W. and Sun, J.

1990

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Kato, T.

1995

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Jan R. Magnus

1985

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Moneta, Alessio and Pallante, Gianluca

2022

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Stephen V. Cameron and Christopher Taber

2004

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Heckman, James J. and Stixrud, Jora and Urzua, Ser...

2006

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Jensen, A.R.

1998

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Baker, Scott R. and Bloom, Nicholas and Davis, Ste...

2016

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Montiel Olea, José Luis and Plagborg-Møller, Mikke...

2022

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.