Citation Analysis

Re-examining Granger Causality from Causal Bayesian \\ Networks Perspective
S. A. Adedayo
https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.02672
41
Citation mentions
32
Cited references
4
Sections
4,262
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Pearl, Judea and others 2000 3 2 4.0 0.073 0.737 100%
2 Reichenbach, Hans 1956 5 1 10.0 0.122 0.693 100%
3 Granger, Clive WJ 1969 3 1 6.0 0.073 0.585 100%
4 Geweke, John 1982 2 1 4.0 0.049 0.511 100%
5 Silver, David and Schrittwieser, Julian and Simony... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.024 0.406 100%
6 Gil, Yolanda and Greaves, Mark and Hendler, James ... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.024 0.406 100%
7 Cliff, Oliver M and Lizier, Joseph T and Tsuchiya,... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.024 0.406 100%
8 Quillien, Tadeg and Lucas, Christopher G 2022 1 1 1.0 0.024 0.406 100%
9 Peters, Jonas and Janzing, Dominik and Scho 2017 1 1 1.0 0.024 0.406 100%
10 L\'e 2012 1 1 1.0 0.024 0.406 100%
11 Buchsbaum, Daphna and Bridgers, Sophie and Skolnic... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.024 0.406 100%
12 Mokhtarian, Ehsan and Akbari, Sina and Ghassami, A... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
13 Ramanan, Nandini and Natarajan, Sriraam 2020 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
14 Heinze-Deml, Christina and Maathuis, Marloes H and... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
15 Chicharro, Daniel and Panzeri, Stefano 2014 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
16 Granger, Clive WJ 1988 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
17 Chen, Yonghong and Rangarajan, Govindan and Feng, ... 2004 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
18 Ancona, Nicola and Marinazzo, Daniele and Stramagl... 2004 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
19 Bell, David and Kay, Jim and Malley, Jim 1996 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
20 Chamberlain, Gary 1982 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
21 Lu 2005 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
22 Shojaie, Ali and Fox, Emily B 2022 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
23 Chen, Xiaowen and Ginoux, Faustine and Mora, Thier... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
24 Wen, Xiaotong and Rangarajan, Govindan and Ding, M... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
25 White, Halbert and Lu, Xun 2010 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
26 Cadotte, Alex J and DeMarse, Thomas B and Mareci, ... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
27 Eichler, Michael and Didelez, Vanessa 2010 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
28 Zou, Cunlu and Feng, Jianfeng 2009 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
29 White, Halbert and Chalak, Karim and Lu, Xun 2011 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
30 Hofer-Szabo 1999 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
31 Spirtes, Peter and Glymour, Clark N and Scheines, ... 2000 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
32 Attal, Ste 2010 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.