← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects with Unmeasured Confounding and Proxies
Chunrong Ai, Jiawei Shan
https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.02214
92
Citation mentions
50
Cited references
17
Sections
5,103
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Tchetgen Tchetgen, Ying, Cui, Shi \harvardand\ Mia... 2024 10 4 18.0 0.109 1.000 100%
2 Cui, Pu, Shi, Miao \harvardand\ Tchetgen Tchetgen 2023 11 6 20.0 0.120 1.000 100%
3 Miao, Shi, Li \harvardand\ Tchetgen Tchetgen 2024 4 3 7.0 0.043 0.928 100%
4 Donald, Imbens \harvardand\ Newey 2009 4 3 6.5 0.043 0.843 75%
5 Miao, Geng \harvardand\ Tchetgen Tchetgen 2018 3 2 4.0 0.033 0.737 100%
6 Brown \harvardand\ Newey 1998 3 3 3.5 0.033 0.737 67%
7 Ai \harvardand\ Chen 2012 5 3 4.5 0.054 0.737 40%
8 Hansen 1982 3 2 5.0 0.033 0.737 100%
9 Newey \harvardand\ Powell 2003 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
10 Chen 2007 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
11 Newey 1997 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
12 Shi, Miao, Nelson \harvardand\ Tchetgen Tchetgen 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
13 Kallus, Mao \harvardand\ Uehara 2022 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
14 Dukes, Shpitser \harvardand\ Tchetgen Tchetgen 2023 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
15 Ying, Miao, Shi \harvardand\ Tchetgen Tchetgen 2023 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
16 Egami \harvardand\ Tchetgen Tchetgen 2024 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
17 Ghassami, Yang, Shpitser \harvardand\ Tchetgen Tch... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
18 Qi, Miao \harvardand\ Zhang 2024 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 Qiu, Shi, Miao, Dobriban \harvardand\ Tchetgen Tch... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Ying 2024 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Scharfstein, Rotnitzky \harvardand\ Robins 1999 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Bang \harvardand\ Robins 2005 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Ai \harvardand\ Chen 2003 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Abadie 2003 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Kline \harvardand\ Tamer 2023 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Mastouri, Zhu, Gultchin, Korba, Silva, Kusner, Gre... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Kompa, Bellamy, Kolokotrones, Robins \harvardand\ ... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Pearl 1995 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Richardson, Evans, Robins \harvardand\ Shpitser 2023 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Guo, Benkeser \harvardand\ Nabi 2023 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Bhattacharya, Nabi \harvardand\ Shpitser 2022 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Guo \harvardand\ Nabi 2024 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Chen, Chernozhukov, Lee \harvardand\ Newey 2014 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Andrews 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Hu \harvardand\ Shiu 2018 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 D'Haultfoeuille 2011 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Kress 1989 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 White 1982 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Newey \harvardand\ Smith 2004 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Greenland \harvardand\ Robins 1986 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 Connors, Speroff, Dawson, Thomas, Harrell, Wagner,... 1996 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
42 Hirano \harvardand\ Imbens 2001 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
43 Tan 2006 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
44 Vermeulen \harvardand\ Vansteelandt 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
45 Newey \harvardand\ McFadden 1994 3 3 1.5 0.033 0.182 0%
46 Eicker 1966 3 1 1.5 0.033 0.126 0%
47 Lu \harvardand\ Shiou 2002 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
48 van der Vaart 1998 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
49 Newey 1991 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
50 Kang \harvardand\ Schafer 2007 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.