Citation Analysis

Minimax Optimal Simple Regret\\ in Two-Armed Best-Arm Identification
Masahiro Kato
https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.17753

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

4,028

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	8	4	9.0	0.222	1.000	100%
2	3	2	3.0	0.083	0.737	100%
3	2	2	3.0	0.056	0.644	100%
4	2	2	1.5	0.056	0.644	100%
5	2	2	2.5	0.056	0.644	100%
6	2	2	2.5	0.056	0.644	100%
7	2	1	1.0	0.056	0.511	100%
8	1	1	1.0	0.028	0.406	100%
9	1	1	1.0	0.028	0.406	100%
10	1	1	0.5	0.028	0.406	100%
11	1	1	0.5	0.028	0.406	100%
12	1	1	0.5	0.028	0.406	100%
13	1	1	0.5	0.028	0.406	100%
14	1	1	2.0	0.028	0.406	100%
15	1	1	2.0	0.028	0.406	100%
16	1	1	2.0	0.028	0.406	100%
17	1	1	2.0	0.028	0.406	100%
18	1	1	2.0	0.028	0.406	100%
19	1	1	2.0	0.028	0.406	100%
20	1	1	2.0	0.028	0.406	100%
21	1	1	2.0	0.028	0.406	100%
22	1	1	2.0	0.028	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.