← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\bf \hspace.2cm
Jinyuan Chang, Cheng Yong Tang, Yuanzheng Zhu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.17354
94
Citation mentions
55
Cited references
16
Sections
4,680
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Shi, Z 2016 9 5 17.0 0.096 1.000 100%
2 6 3 12.0 0.064 1.000 100%
3 Chang, J., Tang, C. Y., & Wu, T (self) 2018 3 3 5.0 0.032 0.843 100%
4 Mengersen, K. L., Pudlo, P., & Robert, C. P 2013 3 3 5.0 0.032 0.843 100%
5 3 3 6.0 0.032 0.843 100%
6 Chauss\'e, P 2017 3 2 4.0 0.032 0.737 100%
7 Ma, Y.-A., Chen, Y., Jin, C., Flammarion, N., & Jo... 2019 3 2 4.0 0.032 0.737 100%
8 Cornuet, J.-M., Marin, J.-M., Mira, A., & Robert, ... 2012 3 2 6.0 0.032 0.737 100%
9 3 2 6.0 0.032 0.737 100%
10 Leng, C., & Tang, C. Y (self) 2012 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
11 Chang, J., Chen, S. X., & Chen, X (self) 2015 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
12 Tang, R., & Yang, Y (self) 2022 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
13 Yu, W., & Bondell, H. D 2024 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
14 Hjort, N. L., McKeague, I., & Van Keilegom, I 2009 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
15 Chaudhuri, S., Mondal, D., & Yin, T 2017 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
16 2 2 4.0 0.021 0.644 100%
17 2 2 4.0 0.021 0.644 100%
18 Marin, J.-M., Pudlo, P., & Sedki, M 2019 3 1 6.0 0.032 0.585 100%
19 Eaton, J., Kortum, S., & Kramarz, F 2011 2 1 4.0 0.021 0.511 100%
20 2 1 4.0 0.021 0.511 100%
21 Owen, A. B 2001 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Chang, J., Chen, S. X., Tang, C. Y., & Wu, T. T (self) 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Tang, C. Y., & Leng, C (self) 2010 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Chang, J., Shi, Z., and Zhang, J (self) 2023 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Lazar, N. A 2003 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Rao, J. N. K., & Wu, C 2010 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Chaudhuri, S., & Ghosh, M 2011 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Yang, Y., & He, X 2012 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Chib, S., Shin, M., & Simoni, A 2018 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Cheng, Y., & Zhao, Y 2019 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Zhao, P., Ghosh, M., Rao, J. N. K., & Wu, C 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Qin, J., & Lawless, J 1994 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Godambe, V. P., & Heyde, C. C 1987 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Donald, S. G., Imbens, G. W., & Newey, W. K 2003 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Chen, S. X., Peng, L., & Qin, Y. L 2009 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Jain, P., & Kar, P 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Tsao, M 2004 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Bissiri, P. G., Holmes, C. C., & Walker, S. G 2016 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 Frazier, D. T., Drovandi, C., & Kohn, R 2023 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
42 Vexler, A., Tao, G., & Hutson, A. D 2014 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
43 Narisetty, N., & He, X 2014 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
44 Castillo, I., Schmidt-Hieber, J., & van der Vaart,... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
45 Ouyang, J., & Bondell, H 2023 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
46 Brooks, S., Gelman, A., Jones, G., & Meng, X.-L 2011 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
47 Roberts, G. O., & Rosenthal, J. S 2004 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
48 Ripley, B. D 2006 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
49 Hesterberg, T 1995 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
50 Gelman, A., Gilks, W. R., & Roberts, G. O 1997 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
51 Chang, J., Tang, C. Y., & Wu, Y (self) 2013 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
52 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
53 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
54 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
55 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.