← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Testing linearity of spatial interaction functions a la Ramsey
Abhimanyu Gupta, Jungyoon Lee, Francesca Rossi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14778
73
Citation mentions
45
Cited references
7
Sections
10,061
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Lyytikainen, T 2012 12 2 23.0 0.164 0.874 100%
2 Hong, Y. and H. White 1995 3 3 5.0 0.041 0.843 100%
3 Konig, M. D., D. Rohner, M. Thoenig, and F. Zilibo... 2017 3 2 5.0 0.041 0.737 100%
4 Jenish, N. and I. R. Prucha 2012 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
5 Tullock, G 1980 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
6 Ballester, C., A. Calvo-Armengol, and Y. Zenou 2006 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
7 Calvo-Armengol, A., E. Patacchini, and Y. Zenou 2009 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
8 Bramoulle, Y. and R. Kranton 2007 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
9 de Jong, R. M. and H. J. Bierens 1994 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
10 Gupta, A. and M. H. Seo (self) 2023 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
11 de Paula, A 2017 3 1 3.0 0.041 0.585 100%
12 Hoshino, T 2022 2 1 2.0 0.027 0.511 100%
13 Kanbur, R. and M. Keen 1993 2 1 4.0 0.027 0.511 100%
14 Redoano, M 2014 2 1 4.0 0.027 0.511 100%
15 Allers, M. and J. P. Elhorst 2005 2 1 4.0 0.027 0.511 100%
16 Cliff, A. D. and K. J. Ord 1968 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
17 Cliff, A. D. and J. K. Ord 1973 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
18 Pinkse, J. and M. E. Slade 2010 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
19 Jenish, N. and I. R. Prucha 2009 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
20 Tincani, M 2018 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
21 Blume, L. E., W. A. Brock, S. N. Durlauf, and Y. M... 2011 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
22 Acemoglu, D., A. Ozdaglar, and A. Tahbaz-Salehi 2016 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
23 Allen, F. and D. Gale 2000 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
24 Ramsey, J. B 1969 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
25 Donald, S. G., G. W. Imbens, and W. K. Newey 2003 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
26 Su, L. and X. Qu 2017 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
27 Gupta, A. and X. Qu (self) 2024 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
28 Chen, S., X. Song, and J. Yu 2025 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
29 Malikov, E. and Y. Sun 2017 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
30 Lee, J., P. C. B. Phillips, and F. Rossi (self) 2024 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
31 Yang, Z., X. Song, and J. Yu 2024 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
32 Devereux, M. P., B. Lockwood, and M. Redoano 2007 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
33 Devereux, M. P., B. Lockwood, and M. Redoano 2008 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
34 Bramoulle, Y., R. Kranton, and M. D'Amours 2014 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
35 Kelejian, H. H. and I. R. Prucha 1998 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
36 Lee, L. F (self) 2002 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
37 Lee, L. F (self) 2004 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
38 Chen, X 2007 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
39 Lee, J. and P. M. Robinson (self) 2016 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
40 Kelejian, H. H. and I. R. Prucha 2010 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
41 Arraiz, I., D. M. Drukker, H. H. Kelejian, and I. ... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
42 Jenish, N 2016 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
43 Gupta, A (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
44 Korolev, I 2019 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
45 Robinson, P. M 2008 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.