Citation Analysis – Moderating the Mediation Bootstrap for Causal Inference

Moderating the Mediation Bootstrap for Causal Inference
Kees Jan van Garderen, Noud van Giersbergen
https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11285

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

6,743

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	MacKinnon, D. P., C. M. Lockwood, and J. Williams	2004	6	3	9.0	0.113	1.000	100%
2	Montoya, A. K. and A. F. Hayes	2017	2	2	3.0	0.038	0.644	100%
3	Shao, J. and D. Tu	1996	2	2	3.0	0.038	0.644	100%
4	Efron, B	1981	3	1	6.0	0.057	0.585	100%
5	Craig, C. C	1936	2	1	2.0	0.038	0.511	100%
6	Efron, B	1982	2	1	4.0	0.038	0.511	100%
7	Davidson, R. and J. G. MacKinnon	2004	2	1	4.0	0.038	0.511	100%
8	Wright, S	1920	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
9	Woodworth, R	1928	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
10	Rozeboom, W. W	1956	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
11	Baron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny	1986	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
12	Preacher, K. J., D. D. Rucker, and A. F. Hayes	2007	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
13	Aroian, L. A	1947	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
14	Meeker, W. Q., L. W. Cornwell, and L. A. Aroian	1981	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
15	MacKinnon, D. P., A. J. Fairchild, and M. S. Fritz	2007	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
16	Shrout, P. E. and N. Bolger	2002	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
17	Bollen, K. and R. Stine	1990	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
18	Rothenberg, T. J. and C. T. Leenders	1964	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
19	Mood, A. M., F. A. Graybill, and D. C. Boes	1974	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
20	Efron, B	1979	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
21	Bickel, P. J. and D. A. Freedman	1981	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
22	Efron, B	1987	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
23	Hall, P	1992	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
24	MacKinnon, D. P., C. M. Lockwood, J. M. Hoffman, S...	2002	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
25	Sobel, M. E	1982	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
26	Fritz, M. S., A. B. Taylor, and D. P. MacKinnon	2012	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
27	Davison, A. C. and D. V. Hinkley	1997	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
28	Lee, S. M. and G. A. Young	1996	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
29	Nankervis, J. C	2005	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
30	Bezanson, J., A. Edelman, S. Karpinski, and V. B. ...	2017	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
31	Booth, J. and B. Presnell	1998	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
32	Hall, P., S. M.-S. Lee, and G. A. Young	2000	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
33	Glonek, G. F. V	1993	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
34	Shi, S. G	1992	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
35	Letson, D. and B. McCullough	1998	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
36	McKnight, S. D., J. W. McKean, and B. E. Huitema	2000	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
37	Chronopoulos, D. K., C. Girardone, and J. C. Nanke...	2015	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
38	Bradley, J. V	1978	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
39	van Garderen, K. J. and N. van Giersbergen (self)	2021	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
40	Gelman, A., J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, D. B. Dunso...	2013	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
41	Jackman, S	2009	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

MacKinnon, D. P., C. M. Lockwood, and J. Williams

2004

9.0

0.113

1.000

100%

Montoya, A. K. and A. F. Hayes

2017

3.0

0.038

0.644

100%

Shao, J. and D. Tu

1996

3.0

0.038

0.644

100%

Efron, B

1981

6.0

0.057

0.585

100%

Craig, C. C

1936

2.0

0.038

0.511

100%

Efron, B

1982

4.0

0.038

0.511

100%

Davidson, R. and J. G. MacKinnon

2004

4.0

0.038

0.511

100%

Wright, S

1920

1.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Woodworth, R

1928

1.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Rozeboom, W. W

1956

1.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Baron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny

1986

1.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Preacher, K. J., D. D. Rucker, and A. F. Hayes

2007

1.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Aroian, L. A

1947

1.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Meeker, W. Q., L. W. Cornwell, and L. A. Aroian

1981

1.0

0.019

0.406

100%

MacKinnon, D. P., A. J. Fairchild, and M. S. Fritz

2007

1.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Shrout, P. E. and N. Bolger

2002

1.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Bollen, K. and R. Stine

1990

1.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Rothenberg, T. J. and C. T. Leenders

1964

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Mood, A. M., F. A. Graybill, and D. C. Boes

1974

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Efron, B

1979

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Bickel, P. J. and D. A. Freedman

1981

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Efron, B

1987

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Hall, P

1992

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

MacKinnon, D. P., C. M. Lockwood, J. M. Hoffman, S...

2002

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Sobel, M. E

1982

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Fritz, M. S., A. B. Taylor, and D. P. MacKinnon

2012

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Davison, A. C. and D. V. Hinkley

1997

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Lee, S. M. and G. A. Young

1996

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Nankervis, J. C

2005

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Bezanson, J., A. Edelman, S. Karpinski, and V. B. ...

2017

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Booth, J. and B. Presnell

1998

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Hall, P., S. M.-S. Lee, and G. A. Young

2000

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Glonek, G. F. V

1993

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Shi, S. G

1992

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Letson, D. and B. McCullough

1998

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

McKnight, S. D., J. W. McKean, and B. E. Huitema

2000

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Chronopoulos, D. K., C. Girardone, and J. C. Nanke...

2015

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Bradley, J. V

1978

1.0

0.019

0.406

100%

van Garderen, K. J. and N. van Giersbergen (self)

2021

1.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Gelman, A., J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, D. B. Dunso...

2013

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Jackman, S

2009

2.0

0.019

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.