← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\vspace-1cm
Stéphane Bonhomme, Koen Jochmans, Martin Weidner
https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10304
86
Citation mentions
48
Cited references
17
Sections
4,286
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Neyman, J 1959 5 4 9.0 0.058 1.000 100%
2 Waterman, R. P. and B. G. Lindsay 1996 5 3 9.0 0.058 1.000 100%
3 Ahmadpoor, M. and B. F. Jones 2019 4 3 6.0 0.047 0.928 100%
4 Chernozhukov, V., D. Chetverikov, M. Demirer, E. D... 2018 3 3 5.0 0.035 0.843 100%
5 Mackey, L., V. Syrgkanis, and I. Zadik 2018 3 3 5.0 0.035 0.843 100%
6 Neyman, J. and E. L. Scott 1948 3 3 6.0 0.035 0.843 100%
7 van der Vaart, A 2014 3 2 5.0 0.035 0.737 100%
8 Hahn, J. and W. K. Newey 2004 3 2 5.0 0.035 0.737 100%
9 Dhaene, G. and K. Jochmans (self) 2015a 3 2 5.0 0.035 0.737 100%
10 Dhaene, G. and K. Jochmans (self) 2015b 3 2 5.0 0.035 0.737 100%
11 Newey, W. K 1994 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
12 Bonhomme, S (self) 2021 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
13 Small, C. G. and D. L. McLeish 1989 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
14 Ductor, L., M. Fafchamps, S. Goyal, and M. J. Van ... 2014 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
15 Abowd, J. M., F. Kramarz, and D. N. Margolis 1999 2 2 1.5 0.023 0.511 50%
16 Kline, P., R. Saggio, and M. S\olvsten 2020 2 2 1.5 0.023 0.511 50%
17 Lancaster, T 2002 2 2 2.5 0.023 0.511 50%
18 Constantine, G. and T. Savits 1996 3 2 3.0 0.035 0.511 33%
19 Wuthrich, K. and Y. Zhu 2021 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
20 Angrist, J. D. and B. Frandsen 2022 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
21 Hahn, J. and J. Hausman 2021 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
22 Jochmans, K. and M. Weidner (self) 2019 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
23 Jackson, C. K., J. E. Rockof\mboxf, and D. O. Stai... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
24 Graham, B. S 2020 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
25 Robins, J., L. Li, E. Tchetgen Tchetgen, and A. va... 2008 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
26 Chesher, A 1991 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
27 Evdokimov, K. S. and A. Zeleneev 2023 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
28 Graham, B. S., G. W. Imbens, and G. Ridder 2014 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
29 Bickel, P 1982 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
30 Schick, A 1986 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
31 Newey, W. K. and J. M. Robins 2017 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
32 Semenova, V., M. Goldman, V. Chernozhukov, and M. ... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
33 Bhattacharyya, A 1946 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
34 McLeish, D. L. and C. G. Small 1994 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
35 Small, C. G. and D. L. McLeish 1988 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
36 Hahn, J. and G. Kuersteiner 2011 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
37 Arellano, M. and J. Hahn 2007 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
38 Woutersen, T 2002 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
39 Arellano, M 2003 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
40 Li, H., B. Lindsay, and R. Waterman 2003 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
41 Kingma, D. P. and M. Welling 2014 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
42 Kodrzycki, Y. K. and P. Yu 2006 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
43 Andrews, M. J., L. Gill, T. Schank, and R. Upward 2008 3 2 1.5 0.035 0.159 0%
44 Magnus, J. R. and H. Neudecker 1980 2 2 1.0 0.023 0.139 0%
45 Ghazal, G. A. and H. Neudecker 2000 2 1 1.0 0.023 0.110 0%
46 Dhaene, G. and K. Jochmans (self) 2016 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
47 Arellano, M. and S. Bonhomme (self) 2012 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
48 Magnus, J. R. and H. Neudecker 1979 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.