← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

A Kernel Score Perspective on Forecast Disagreement\\ and the Linear Pool
Fabian Krüger
https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.09430
90
Citation mentions
50
Cited references
9
Sections
2,791
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Gneiting, T. and A. E. Raftery 2007 9 6 16.0 0.100 1.000 100%
2 Kruger, F. and L. Pavlova 2024 6 4 11.0 0.067 1.000 100%
3 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2024 6 5 10.0 0.067 1.000 100%
4 Neyman, E. and T. Roughgarden 2023 7 3 13.0 0.078 1.000 100%
5 Mitchell, J., T. Shiroff, and H. Braitsch 2024 5 3 9.0 0.056 1.000 100%
6 Gneiting, T. 2012 6 4 12.0 0.067 1.000 100%
7 Knüppel, M. and F. Krüger (self) 2022 3 2 5.0 0.033 0.737 100%
8 Wallis, K. F. 2005 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
9 Clements, M. P., R. W. Rich, and J. S. Tracy 2023 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
10 Cumings-Menon, R., M. Shin, and D. K. Sill 2021 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
11 Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
12 Pettigrew, R. 2019 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
13 Wang, X., R. J. Hyndman, F. Li, and Y. Kang 2023 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
14 Stone, M. 1961 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
15 Genest, C. and J. V. Zidek 1986 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
16 Hall, S. G. and J. Mitchell 2007 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
17 Geweke, J. and G. Amisano 2011 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
18 Gneiting, T. and R. Ranjan 2013 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 Lichtendahl Jr, K. C., Y. Grushka-Cockayne, and R.... 2013 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Rich, R. and J. Tracy 2010 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Zarnowitz, V. and L. A. Lambros 1987 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Lahiri, K. and X. Sheng 2010 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Clark, T. E. and E. Mertens 2024 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Coibion, O. and Y. Gorodnichenko 2012 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Dovern, J. 2015 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Andrade, P., R. K. Crump, S. Eusepi, and E. Moench 2016 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Dawid, A. P. 2007 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Szekely, G. J. and M. L. Rizzo 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Allen, S., D. Ginsbourger, and J. Ziegel 2023 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Shoja, M. and E. S. Soofi 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Banternghansa, C. and M. W. McCracken 2009 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Matheson, J. E. and R. L. Winkler 1976 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Thorarinsdottir, T. L., T. Gneiting, and N. Gissib... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Bellemare, M. G., I. Danihelka, W. Dabney, S. Moha... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Resin, J., D. Wolffram, J. Bracher, and T. Dimitri... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Knuppel, M., F. Kruger, and M.-O. Pohle 2022 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Brier, G. W. 1950 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Epstein, E. S. 1969 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Engle, R. F. 1983 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Krüger, F. (self) 2013 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 Federal Reserve Bank of New York 2024 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
42 D’Acunto, F., E. Charalambakis, D. Georgarakos, G.... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
43 Boero, G., J. Smith, and K. F. Wallis 2011 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
44 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
45 Schefzik, R., T. L. Thorarinsdottir, and T. Gneiti... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
46 Primiceri, G. E. 2005 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
47 Del Negro, M. and G. E. Primiceri 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
48 Kruger, F. 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
49 Kruger, F., T. E. Clark, and F. Ravazzolo 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
50 Abbas, A. E. 2009 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.