Citation Analysis

Treatment effect analysis under social interactions
Bora Kim
https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.05919

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

4,519

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Leung, M. P	2020	3	3	5.0	0.103	0.843	100%
2	Aronow, P. M., & Samii, C	2017	2	2	3.0	0.069	0.644	100%
3	Angrist, J.D., & Pischke, J.S	2009	2	2	4.0	0.069	0.644	100%
4	Bandiera, O., Barankay, I., & Rasul, I	2010	2	1	2.0	0.069	0.511	100%
5			1	1	1.0	0.034	0.406	100%
6	Rubin, D. B	1980	1	1	1.0	0.034	0.406	100%
7	Bryan, G., Chowdhury, S., and Mobarak, A. M	2014	1	1	1.0	0.034	0.406	100%
8	Cai, J., De Janvry, A., and Sadoulet, E	2015	1	1	1.0	0.034	0.406	100%
9	Miguel, E., & Kremer, M	2004	1	1	1.0	0.034	0.406	100%
10	Oster, E., & Thornton, R	2012	1	1	1.0	0.034	0.406	100%
11	Manski, C. F	2013	1	1	1.0	0.034	0.406	100%
12	Vazquez-Bare, G	2023	1	1	1.0	0.034	0.406	100%
13	Borusyak, K., & Hull, P	2023	1	1	1.0	0.034	0.406	100%
14	Barabási, A.-L	2016	1	1	1.0	0.034	0.406	100%
15	Carter, M., Laajaj, R., & Yang, D	2021	1	1	1.0	0.034	0.406	100%
16	Dupas, P	2014	1	1	1.0	0.034	0.406	100%
17	Godlonton, S., & Thornton, R	2012	1	1	1.0	0.034	0.406	100%
18	Słoczyński, T	2022	1	1	1.0	0.034	0.406	100%
19	Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., & Fortin, B	2020	1	1	1.0	0.034	0.406	100%
20	Hudgens, M. G., & Halloran, M. E	2008	1	1	2.0	0.034	0.406	100%
21	Lee, M.J	2018	1	1	2.0	0.034	0.406	100%
22	Lee, M.J., & Han, C	2024	1	1	2.0	0.034	0.406	100%
23	Griffith, A	2021	1	1	2.0	0.034	0.406	100%
24	Sävje, F	2024	1	1	2.0	0.034	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.