Citation Analysis

Bundle Choice Model with Endogenous Regressors: An Application to Soda Tax
Tao Sun
https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.05794
104
Citation mentions
52
Cited references
9
Sections
11,547
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Gentzkow, Matthew 2007 11 6 18.0 0.106 1.000 100%
2 Iaria, Alessandro and Wang, Ao 2020 5 3 7.0 0.048 1.000 100%
3 Rossi, Peter E and Allenby, Greg M and McCulloch, ... 2012 4 3 7.0 0.038 0.928 100%
4 Jacobi, Liana and Wagner, Helga and Fru 2016 5 4 7.5 0.048 0.928 80%
5 Wagner, Helga and Fru 2023 4 4 5.5 0.038 0.843 75%
6 Jacobi, Liana and Sovinsky, Michelle and Sun, Tao (self) 2024 4 2 5.0 0.038 0.811 100%
7 Deza, Monica 2015 3 2 5.0 0.029 0.737 100%
8 Loaiza-Maya, Ruben and Nibbering, Didier 2022 3 2 4.0 0.029 0.737 100%
9 Sovinsky, Michelle and Jacobi, Liana and Allocca, ... (self) 2024 3 2 5.0 0.029 0.737 100%
10 Ershov, Daniel and Orr, Scott and Laliberte, Jean-... 2024 5 1 5.0 0.048 0.693 100%
11 McCulloch, Robert and Rossi, Peter E 1994 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
12 Bronnenberg, Bart J and Kruger, Michael W and Mela... 2008 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
13 Berry, Steven and Levinsohn, James and Pakes, Arie... 1995 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
14 Sylvia Frühwirth-Schnatter and Darjus Hosszejni an... 2023 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
15 Nevo, Aviv 2000 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
16 Wang, Rui 2023 3 1 3.0 0.029 0.585 100%
17 Liu, Hongju and Chintagunta, Pradeep K and Zhu, Ti... 2010 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
18 Bhattacharya, Anirban and Dunson, David B 2011 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
19 Durante, Daniele 2017 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
20 Allcott, Hunt and Lockwood, Benjamin B and Taubins... 2019 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
21 Kastner, Gregor 2019 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
22 Conley, Timothy G and Hansen, Christian B and McCu... 2008 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
23 Fox, Jeremy T and Lazzati, Natalia 2017 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
24 Van Dyk, David A and Meng, Xiao-Li 2001 2 2 2.5 0.019 0.511 50%
25 Lee, Sanghak and Kim, Jaehwan and Allenby, Greg M 2013 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 Hendel, Igal 1999 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Nevo, Aviv and Rubinfeld, Daniel L and McCabe, Mar... 2005 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Lopes, Hedibert F and Polson, Nicholas G 2014 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
29 Crawford, Gregory S and Yurukoglu, Ali 2012 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Ho, Katherine and Ho, Justin and Mortimer, Julie H... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Gentzkow, Matthew and Shapiro, Jesse M and Sinkins... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Grzybowski, Lukasz and Verboven, Frank 2016 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Thomassen, \O 2017 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
34 Crawford, Gregory S and Lee, Robin S and Whinston,... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
35 Ouyang, Fu and Yang, Thomas Tao 2023 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
36 Lopes, Hedibert Freitas and West, Mike 2004 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
37 Philipov, Alexander and Glickman, Mark E 2006 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 Chib, Siddhartha and Nardari, Federico and Shephar... 2006 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
39 Han, Yufeng 2006 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
40 Lopes, Hedibert Freitas and Carvalho, Carlos Marin... 2007 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
41 Nakajima, Jouchi and West, Mike 2012 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
42 Zhou, Xiaocong and Nakajima, Jouchi and West, Mike 2014 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
43 Ishihara, Tsunehiro and Omori, Yasuhiro 2017 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
44 Heckman, James J and Lopes, Hedibert F and Piatek,... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
45 Harding, Matthew and Lovenheim, Michael 2017 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
46 Bonnet, Céline and Réquillart, Vincent 2013 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
47 Wang, Yichen 2015 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
48 Allcott, Hunt and Lockwood, Benjamin B and Taubins... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
49 Chernozhukov, Victor and Hausman, Jerry and Newey,... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
50 Dubois, Pierre and Griffith, Rachel and O’Connell,... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
51 Keane, Michael P 1992 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
52 Lewbel, Arthur 2000 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.