Citation Analysis

USE OF SURROGATE ENDPOINTS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A REVIEW OF SELECTED NICE TECHNOLOGY APPRAISALS IN ONCOLOGY
Lorna Wheaton, Sylwia Bujkiewicz
https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02380
107
Citation mentions
46
Cited references
6
Sections
6,580
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Ciani, Oriana and Buyse, Marc and Drummond, Michae... 2017 6 6 11.0 0.056 1.000 100%
2 5 5 10.0 0.047 1.000 100%
3 6 3 12.0 0.056 1.000 100%
4 5 5 10.0 0.047 1.000 100%
5 5 5 10.0 0.047 1.000 100%
6 6 4 12.0 0.056 1.000 100%
7 5 3 10.0 0.047 1.000 100%
8 5 5 10.0 0.047 1.000 100%
9 4 4 8.0 0.037 0.928 100%
10 4 3 8.0 0.037 0.928 100%
11 4 4 8.0 0.037 0.928 100%
12 4 4 8.0 0.037 0.928 100%
13 3 3 6.0 0.028 0.843 100%
14 3 3 6.0 0.028 0.843 100%
15 3 3 6.0 0.028 0.843 100%
16 3 3 6.0 0.028 0.843 100%
17 3 3 6.0 0.028 0.843 100%
18 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
19 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
20 Dawoud, Dalia and Naci, Huseyin and Ciani, Oriana ... (self) 2021 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
21 Ciani, Oriana and Grigore, Bogdan and Blommestein,... 2021 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
22 Ciani, Oriana and Buyse, Marc and Drummond, Mike a... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
23 Ciani, Oriana and Grigore, Bogdan and Taylor, Rod ... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 DeMets, David L and Psaty, Bruce M and Fleming, Th... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Gyawali, Bishal and Hey, Spencer Phillips and Kess... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Robb, Melissa A and McInnes, Pamela M and Califf, ... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Kemp, Robert and Prasad, Vinay 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Grigore, Bogdan and Ciani, Oriana and Dams, Floria... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Ensor, Hannah and Lee, Robert J and Sudlow, Cathie... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Bujkiewicz, S and Achana, F and Papanikos, T and R... (self) 2019 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Welton, Nicky J and Phillippo, David and Owen, Rhi... (self) 2020 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Polak, Tobias B and Cucchi, David GJ and van Rosma... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Fleming, Thomas R and Powers, John H 2012 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Mauguen, Audrey and Pignon, Jean-Pierre and Burdet... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Car... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Papanikos, Tasos and Thompson, John R and Abrams, ... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Janharpreet Singh and Sumayya Anwer and Stephen Pa... (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Wheaton, Lorna and Papanikos, Anastasios and Thoma... (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Manyara, Anthony Muchai and Davies, Philippa and S... (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Ciani, Oriana and Manyara, Anthony M and Davies, P... (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Manyara, Anthony Muchai and Davies, Philippa and S... (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Bouvy, Jacoline 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.