Citation Analysis – Endogenous Interference in Randomized Experiments

Endogenous Interference in Randomized Experiments
Mengsi Gao
https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02183

200

Citation mentions

109

Cited references

Sections

9,174

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Hudgens, M. G. and M. E. Halloran	2008	5	4	6.0	0.025	1.000	100%
2	Borusyak, K. and P. Hull	2023	6	3	8.0	0.030	1.000	100%
3	Prina, S.	2015	19	5	32.5	0.095	0.982	95%
4	Carrell, S. E., B. I. Sacerdote, and J. E. West	2013	4	4	4.5	0.020	0.928	100%
5	Pearl, J.	2001	5	5	6.0	0.025	0.928	80%
6	---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---	2013	4	3	6.0	0.020	0.928	100%
7	Ad\ ao, R., M. Kolesar, and E. Morales	2019	4	3	5.0	0.020	0.928	100%
8	---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---		4	3	8.0	0.020	0.928	100%
9	Banerjee, A., E. Breza, A. G. Chandrasekhar, E. Du...	2023	3	3	4.0	0.015	0.843	100%
10	Heckman, J. J. and R. Pinto	2015	3	3	3.5	0.015	0.843	100%
11	Borusyak, K., P. Hull, and X. Jaravel	2022	5	4	5.5	0.025	0.843	60%
12	Cai, Y.	2022	3	3	6.0	0.015	0.843	100%
13	Li, S. and S. Wager	2022	13	6	13.0	0.065	0.814	54%
14	De Giorgi, G., A. Frederiksen, and L. Pistaferri	2020	3	2	3.0	0.015	0.737	100%
15	Comola, M. and S. Prina	2021	3	2	3.0	0.015	0.737	100%
16	Sacerdote, B.	2001	2	2	1.5	0.010	0.644	100%
17	Sobel, M. E.	2006	2	2	1.5	0.010	0.644	100%
18	Cox, D. R.	1958	2	2	1.5	0.010	0.644	100%
19	Rubin, D. B.	1980	2	2	1.5	0.010	0.644	100%
20	Carter, M., R. Laajaj, and D. Yang	2021	2	2	3.0	0.010	0.644	100%
21	Aronow, P. M. and C. Samii	2017	2	2	1.5	0.010	0.644	100%
22	Manski, C. F.	1993	2	2	1.5	0.010	0.644	100%
23	Bartik, T.	1991	2	2	1.5	0.010	0.644	100%
24	Bramoulle, Y., H. Djebbari, and B. Fortin	2009	2	2	2.5	0.010	0.644	100%
25	Dieye, R., H. Djebbari, and F. Barrera-Osorio	2014	2	2	2.5	0.010	0.644	100%
26	Auerbach, E.		2	2	2.5	0.010	0.644	100%
27	Card, D.	2009	2	2	2.5	0.010	0.644	100%
28	Autor, D. H., D. Dorn, and G. H. Hanson	2013	2	2	2.5	0.010	0.644	100%
29	Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., I. Sorkin, and H. Swift	2020	2	2	2.5	0.010	0.644	100%
30	---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---	2023	4	1	8.0	0.020	0.644	100%
31	Leung, M.	2020	2	2	1.0	0.010	0.511	50%
32	Baron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny	1986	2	1	4.0	0.010	0.511	100%
33	---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---	2020	2	2	2.5	0.010	0.511	50%
34	Miguel, E. and M. Kremer	2004	1	1	1.0	0.005	0.406	100%
35	Banerjee, A., A. G. Chandrasekhar, E. Duflo, and M...	2013	1	1	1.0	0.005	0.406	100%
36	Cai, J., A. D. Janvry, and E. Sadoulet	2015	1	1	1.0	0.005	0.406	100%
37	Paluck, E. L., H. Shepherd, and P. M. Aronow	2016	1	1	1.0	0.005	0.406	100%
38	Barnhardt, S., E. Field, and R. Pande	2017	1	1	1.0	0.005	0.406	100%
39	Blume, L. E., W. A. Brock, S. N. Durlauf, and R. J...	2015	1	1	1.0	0.005	0.406	100%
40	Angrist, J. D.	2014	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
41	---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---	2020	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
42	De Giorgi, G., M. Pellizzari, and S. Redaelli	2010	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
43	Nicoletti, C., K. G. Salvanes, and E. Tominey	2018	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
44	Arduini, T., E. Patacchini, and E. Rainone	2020	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
45	Goldsmith-Pinkham, P. and G. W. Imbens	2013	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
46	Graham, B. S.	2015	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
47	---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---	2017	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
48	Hsieh, C.-S. and L. F. Lee	2016	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
49	Hsieh, C.-S., L.-F. Lee, and V. Boucher	2019	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
50	Johnsson, I. and H. R. Moon	2019	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
51	Arcidiacono, P., G. Foster, N. Goodpaster, and J. ...	2012	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
52	de Paula, A., I. Rasul, and P. Souza	2023	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
53	Arellano, M. and S. Bond	1991	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
54	Bun, M. and V. Sarafidis	2015	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
55	Auerbach, E. and Y. Cai	2023	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
56	Nakamura, E. and J. Steinsson	2014	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
57	Bourveau, T., G. She, and A. \v Zaldokas	2020	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
58	Breuer, M.	2022	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
59	Imbens, G. W. and D. B. Rubin	2015	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
60	Abadie, A., S. Athey, G. W. Imbens, and J. M. Wool...	2020	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
61	Leung, M. P.	2022	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
62	Gao, M. and P. Ding (self)	2023	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
63	Tchetgen, E. J. T. and T. J. VanderWeele	2012	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
64	Liu, L., M. G. Hudgens, B. Saul, J. D. Clemens, M....	2019	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
65	Vanderweele, T. J., G. Hong, S. M. Jones, and J. L...	2013	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
66	Cheng, L., R. Guo, and H. Liu	2022	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
67	Che, C., I. H. Jin, and Z. Zhang	2021	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
68	Liu, H., I. H. Jin, Z. Zhang, and Y. Yuan	2021	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
69	Di Maria, C., A. Abbruzzo, and G. Lovison	2022	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
70	Hayes, A., M. M. Fredrickson, and K. Levin	2023	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
71	Sweet, T. M.	2018	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
72	Sweet, T. and S. Adhikari	2020	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
73	Guha, S. and A. Rodriguez	2021	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.406	100%
74	Robins, J. M. and S. Greenland	1992	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
75	Aldous, D. J.	1981	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
76	Lovasz, L. and B. Szegedy	2006	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
77	Bickel, P. J. and A. Chen	2009	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
78	Gao, C., Y. Lu, and H. H. Zhou (self)	2015	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
79	Zhang, Y., E. Levina, and J. Zhu	2017	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
80	---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---	2020	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
81	Parise, F. and A. Ozdaglar	2023	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
82	Hu, Y., S. Li, and S. Wager	2022	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
83	Peri, G., K. Shih, and C. Sparber	2015	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
84	Bickel, P. J., A. Chen, and E. Levina	2011	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
85	Hansen, B. E. and S. Lee	2019	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
86	Berry, S., J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes	1995	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
87	Armstrong, T. B.	2016	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
88	Le, C. M. and T. Li	2022	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
89	Holland, P. W., K. B. Laskey, and S. Leinhardt	1983	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
90	Young, S. J. and E. R. Scheinerman	2007	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
91	Athreya, A., D. E. Fishkind, M. Tang, C. E. Priebe...	2017	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
92	Hoff, P. D., A. E. Raftery, and M. S. Handcock	2002	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
93	Cheng, C., Y. Wei, and Y. Chen	2021	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
94	Li, G., C. Cai, H. V. Poor, and Y. Chen	2022	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
95	Tibshirani, R.	1996	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
96	Alt, J., R. Ducatez, and A. Knowles	2021	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
97	Benaych-Georges, F., C. Bordenave, and A. Knowles	2019	1	1	2.0	0.005	0.406	100%
98	Jackson, M. O.	2021	1	1	1.0	0.005	0.406	100%
99	Baird, S., J. A. Bohren, C. McIntosh, and B. Ozler	2018	1	1	1.0	0.005	0.406	100%
100	Cai, C., J. Pouget-Abadie, and E. M. Airoldi	2022	1	1	1.0	0.005	0.406	100%
101	---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---		1	1	1.0	0.005	0.406	100%
102	Viviano, D.		1	1	1.0	0.005	0.406	100%
103	Alidaee, H., E. Auerbach, and M. P. Leung	2020	1	1	1.0	0.005	0.406	100%
104	Breza, E., A. G. Chandrasekhar, T. H. McCormick, a...	2020	1	1	1.0	0.005	0.406	100%
105	Ross, N.	2011	2	1	1.0	0.010	0.110	0%
106	Yu, Y., T. Wang, and R. J. Samworth	2015	2	1	1.0	0.010	0.110	0%
107	Su, F. and P. Ding	2021	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.087	0%
108	Li, X. and P. Ding	2020	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.087	0%
109	Lei, J. and A. Rinaldo	2015	1	1	0.5	0.005	0.087	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Hudgens, M. G. and M. E. Halloran

2008

6.0

0.025

1.000

100%

Borusyak, K. and P. Hull

2023

8.0

0.030

1.000

100%

Prina, S.

2015

32.5

0.095

0.982

95%

Carrell, S. E., B. I. Sacerdote, and J. E. West

2013

4.5

0.020

0.928

100%

Pearl, J.

2001

6.0

0.025

0.928

80%

---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---

2013

6.0

0.020

0.928

100%

Ad\ ao, R., M. Kolesar, and E. Morales

2019

5.0

0.020

0.928

100%

---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---

8.0

0.020

0.928

100%

Banerjee, A., E. Breza, A. G. Chandrasekhar, E. Du...

2023

4.0

0.015

0.843

100%

Heckman, J. J. and R. Pinto

2015

3.5

0.015

0.843

100%

Borusyak, K., P. Hull, and X. Jaravel

2022

5.5

0.025

0.843

60%

Cai, Y.

2022

6.0

0.015

0.843

100%

Li, S. and S. Wager

2022

13.0

0.065

0.814

54%

De Giorgi, G., A. Frederiksen, and L. Pistaferri

2020

3.0

0.015

0.737

100%

Comola, M. and S. Prina

2021

3.0

0.015

0.737

100%

Sacerdote, B.

2001

1.5

0.010

0.644

100%

Sobel, M. E.

2006

1.5

0.010

0.644

100%

Cox, D. R.

1958

1.5

0.010

0.644

100%

Rubin, D. B.

1980

1.5

0.010

0.644

100%

Carter, M., R. Laajaj, and D. Yang

2021

3.0

0.010

0.644

100%

Aronow, P. M. and C. Samii

2017

1.5

0.010

0.644

100%

Manski, C. F.

1993

1.5

0.010

0.644

100%

Bartik, T.

1991

1.5

0.010

0.644

100%

Bramoulle, Y., H. Djebbari, and B. Fortin

2009

2.5

0.010

0.644

100%

Dieye, R., H. Djebbari, and F. Barrera-Osorio

2014

2.5

0.010

0.644

100%

Auerbach, E.

2.5

0.010

0.644

100%

Card, D.

2009

2.5

0.010

0.644

100%

Autor, D. H., D. Dorn, and G. H. Hanson

2013

2.5

0.010

0.644

100%

Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., I. Sorkin, and H. Swift

2020

2.5

0.010

0.644

100%

---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---

2023

8.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Leung, M.

2020

1.0

0.010

0.511

50%

Baron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny

1986

4.0

0.010

0.511

100%

---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---

2020

2.5

0.010

0.511

50%

Miguel, E. and M. Kremer

2004

1.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Banerjee, A., A. G. Chandrasekhar, E. Duflo, and M...

2013

1.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Cai, J., A. D. Janvry, and E. Sadoulet

2015

1.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Paluck, E. L., H. Shepherd, and P. M. Aronow

2016

1.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Barnhardt, S., E. Field, and R. Pande

2017

1.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Blume, L. E., W. A. Brock, S. N. Durlauf, and R. J...

2015

1.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Angrist, J. D.

2014

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---

2020

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

De Giorgi, G., M. Pellizzari, and S. Redaelli

2010

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Nicoletti, C., K. G. Salvanes, and E. Tominey

2018

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Arduini, T., E. Patacchini, and E. Rainone

2020

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Goldsmith-Pinkham, P. and G. W. Imbens

2013

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Graham, B. S.

2015

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---

2017

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Hsieh, C.-S. and L. F. Lee

2016

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Hsieh, C.-S., L.-F. Lee, and V. Boucher

2019

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Johnsson, I. and H. R. Moon

2019

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Arcidiacono, P., G. Foster, N. Goodpaster, and J. ...

2012

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

de Paula, A., I. Rasul, and P. Souza

2023

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Arellano, M. and S. Bond

1991

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Bun, M. and V. Sarafidis

2015

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Auerbach, E. and Y. Cai

2023

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Nakamura, E. and J. Steinsson

2014

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Bourveau, T., G. She, and A. \v Zaldokas

2020

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Breuer, M.

2022

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Imbens, G. W. and D. B. Rubin

2015

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Abadie, A., S. Athey, G. W. Imbens, and J. M. Wool...

2020

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Leung, M. P.

2022

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Gao, M. and P. Ding (self)

2023

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Tchetgen, E. J. T. and T. J. VanderWeele

2012

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Liu, L., M. G. Hudgens, B. Saul, J. D. Clemens, M....

2019

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Vanderweele, T. J., G. Hong, S. M. Jones, and J. L...

2013

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Cheng, L., R. Guo, and H. Liu

2022

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Che, C., I. H. Jin, and Z. Zhang

2021

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Liu, H., I. H. Jin, Z. Zhang, and Y. Yuan

2021

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Di Maria, C., A. Abbruzzo, and G. Lovison

2022

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Hayes, A., M. M. Fredrickson, and K. Levin

2023

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Sweet, T. M.

2018

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Sweet, T. and S. Adhikari

2020

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Guha, S. and A. Rodriguez

2021

0.5

0.005

0.406

100%

Robins, J. M. and S. Greenland

1992

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Aldous, D. J.

1981

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Lovasz, L. and B. Szegedy

2006

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Bickel, P. J. and A. Chen

2009

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Gao, C., Y. Lu, and H. H. Zhou (self)

2015

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Zhang, Y., E. Levina, and J. Zhu

2017

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---

2020

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Parise, F. and A. Ozdaglar

2023

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Hu, Y., S. Li, and S. Wager

2022

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Peri, G., K. Shih, and C. Sparber

2015

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Bickel, P. J., A. Chen, and E. Levina

2011

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Hansen, B. E. and S. Lee

2019

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Berry, S., J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes

1995

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Armstrong, T. B.

2016

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Le, C. M. and T. Li

2022

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Holland, P. W., K. B. Laskey, and S. Leinhardt

1983

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Young, S. J. and E. R. Scheinerman

2007

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Athreya, A., D. E. Fishkind, M. Tang, C. E. Priebe...

2017

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Hoff, P. D., A. E. Raftery, and M. S. Handcock

2002

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Cheng, C., Y. Wei, and Y. Chen

2021

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Li, G., C. Cai, H. V. Poor, and Y. Chen

2022

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Tibshirani, R.

1996

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Alt, J., R. Ducatez, and A. Knowles

2021

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Benaych-Georges, F., C. Bordenave, and A. Knowles

2019

2.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Jackson, M. O.

2021

1.0

0.005

0.406

100%

Baird, S., J. A. Bohren, C. McIntosh, and B. Ozler

2018

1.0

0.005

0.406

100%

100

Cai, C., J. Pouget-Abadie, and E. M. Airoldi

2022

1.0

0.005

0.406

100%

101

---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---

1.0

0.005

0.406

100%

102

Viviano, D.

1.0

0.005

0.406

100%

103

Alidaee, H., E. Auerbach, and M. P. Leung

2020

1.0

0.005

0.406

100%

104

Breza, E., A. G. Chandrasekhar, T. H. McCormick, a...

2020

1.0

0.005

0.406

100%

105

Ross, N.

2011

1.0

0.010

0.110

106

Yu, Y., T. Wang, and R. J. Samworth

2015

1.0

0.010

0.110

107

Su, F. and P. Ding

2021

0.5

0.005

0.087

108

Li, X. and P. Ding

2020

0.5

0.005

0.087

109

Lei, J. and A. Rinaldo

2015

0.5

0.005

0.087

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.