← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

A Dimension-Agnostic Bootstrap Anderson-Rubin Test For Instrumental Variable Regressions
Dennis Lim, Wenjie Wang, Yichong Zhang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.01603
236
Citation mentions
101
Cited references
18
Sections
7,986
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Dov\`\i, M.-S., A. B. Kock, and S. Mavroeidis 2024 11 6 19.0 0.047 1.000 100%
2 6 3 11.0 0.025 1.000 100%
3 Mikusheva, A. and L. Sun 2022 13 8 21.5 0.055 0.974 92%
4 Navjeevan, M 2023 9 4 15.5 0.038 0.962 89%
5 Crudu, F., G. Mellace, and Z. Sandor 2021 8 5 12.5 0.034 0.957 88%
6 8 4 12.5 0.034 0.957 88%
7 Belloni, A., D. Chen, V. Chernozhukov, and C. Hans... 2012 6 4 8.5 0.025 0.941 83%
8 Carrasco, M. and G. Tchuente 2015 4 3 7.0 0.017 0.928 100%
9 Carrasco, M. and G. Tchuente 2016a 4 3 7.0 0.017 0.928 100%
10 Kline, P., R. Saggio, and M. S\olvsten 2020 4 3 7.0 0.017 0.928 100%
11 Carrasco, M. and M. Doukali 2017 3 3 5.0 0.013 0.843 100%
12 Carrasco, M. and G. Tchuente 2016b 4 3 5.5 0.017 0.843 75%
13 Cattaneo, M. D., M. Jansson, and W. K. Newey 2018 4 3 5.5 0.017 0.843 75%
14 4 2 7.0 0.017 0.811 100%
15 Lee, D. S., J. McCrary, M. J. Moreira, and J. R. P... 2022 3 2 4.0 0.013 0.737 100%
16 3 2 5.0 0.013 0.737 100%
17 3 2 4.0 0.013 0.737 100%
18 Anatolyev, S. and N. Gospodinov 2011 3 2 4.0 0.013 0.737 100%
19 Carrasco, M 2012 3 2 5.0 0.013 0.737 100%
20 2 2 3.0 0.008 0.644 100%
21 Boot, T. and D. Nibbering 2024 2 2 3.0 0.008 0.644 100%
22 Matsushita, Y. and T. Otsu 2024 2 2 3.0 0.008 0.644 100%
23 2 2 3.0 0.008 0.644 100%
24 Cattaneo, M. D., M. Jansson, and X. Ma 2019 2 2 3.0 0.008 0.644 100%
25 Lin, L., F. Su, W. Mou, P. Ding, and M. Wainwright 2024 2 2 3.0 0.008 0.644 100%
26 Yang, W., X. Guo, and L. Zhu 2024 2 2 3.0 0.008 0.644 100%
27 2 1 2.0 0.008 0.511 100%
28 2 1 2.0 0.008 0.511 100%
29 Andrews, I 2016 2 2 2.5 0.008 0.511 50%
30 Hausman, J. A., W. K. Newey, T. Woutersen, J. C. C... 2012 31 3 20.0 0.131 0.459 10%
31 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
32 Kling, J. R 2006 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
33 Doyle Jr., J. J 2007 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
34 Dahl, G. B., A. R. Kost\ol, and M. Mogstad 2014 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
35 Dobbie, W., J. Goldin, and C. S. Yang 2018 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
36 Sampat, B. and H. L. Williams 2019 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
37 Agan, A., J. L. Doleac, and A. Harvey 2023 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
38 Frandsen, B., L. Lefgren, and E. Leslie 2023 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
39 Chyn, E., B. Frandsen, and E. C. Leslie 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
40 Fama, E. F. and J. D. MacBeth 1973 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
41 Shanken, J 1992 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
42 Deryugina, T., G. Heutel, N. H. Miller, D. Molitor... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
43 Bondy, M., S. Roth, and L. Sager 2020 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
44 Gabaix, X. and R. S. Koijen 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
45 Blandhol, C., J. Bonney, M. Mogstad, and A. Torgov... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
46 S\loczy\'nski, T 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
47 Davey Smith, G. and S. Ebrahim 2003 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
48 Davies, N. M., S. von Hinke Kessler Scholder, H. F... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
49 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
50 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
51 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
52 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
53 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
54 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
55 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
56 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
57 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
58 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
59 Hansen, C. and D. Kozbur 2014 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
60 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
61 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
62 Tuvaandorj, P 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
63 Wuthrich, K. and Y. Zhu 2023 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
64 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
65 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
66 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
67 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
68 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
69 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
70 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
71 Roodman, D., M. \O. Nielsen, J. G. MacKinnon, and ... 2019a 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
72 Young, A 2022 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
73 Wang, W. and Y. Zhang (self) 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
74 Horowitz, J. L. and V. G. Spokoiny 2001 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
75 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
76 Mikusheva, A. and L. Sun 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
77 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
78 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
79 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
80 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
81 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
82 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
83 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
84 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
85 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
86 MacKinnon, J. G., M. \O. Nielsen, and M. D. Webb 2023 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
87 Kolesar, M 2018 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
88 Evdokimov, K. S. and M. Kolesar 2018 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
89 Yap, L 2024 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
90 Pollard, D 2001 6 2 3.0 0.025 0.188 0%
91 Rudelson, M. and R. Vershynin 2015 5 1 2.5 0.021 0.149 0%
92 Chernozhukov, V., D. Chetverikov, and K. Kato 2014 2 2 1.0 0.008 0.139 0%
93 2 1 2.0 0.008 0.110 0%
94 Vershynin, R 2018 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.087 0%
95 Freedman, D. A 1975 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.087 0%
96 Bhatia, R 2013 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.087 0%
97 Monti, K. L. and P. K. Sen 1976 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.087 0%
98 Koziol, J. A. and M. D. Perlman 1978 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.087 0%
99 Varah, J. M 1975 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.087 0%
100 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.087 0%
101 Matsushita, Y. and T. Otsu 2020 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.