Citation Analysis

Difference-in-differences Design with Outcomes\\Missing Not at Random
Sooahn Shin
https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18772
35
Citation mentions
15
Cited references
10
Sections
6,492
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Lee, David S 2009 6 4 10.0 0.171 1.000 100%
2 Dukes, Oliver and Richardson, David and Tchetgen T... 2022 6 4 10.0 0.171 1.000 100%
3 Zhang, Junni L and Rubin, Donald B 2003 3 2 5.0 0.086 0.737 100%
4 Sexton, Renard and Zu 2024 3 2 6.0 0.086 0.737 100%
5 Frangakis, Constantine E and Rubin, Donald B 2002 2 2 3.0 0.057 0.644 100%
6 Wang, Linbo and Zhou, Xiao-Hua and Richardson, Tho... 2017 2 2 4.0 0.057 0.644 100%
7 Tchetgen Tchetgen, Eric J and Wirth, Kathleen E 2017 3 1 6.0 0.086 0.585 100%
8 Ghanem, Dalia and Hirshleifer, Sarojini and Kedagn... 2022 2 1 2.0 0.057 0.511 100%
9 Bisgaard, Martin and Slothuus, Rune 2018 2 1 4.0 0.057 0.511 100%
10 Chiu, Albert and Lan, Xingchen and Liu, Ziyi and X... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
11 Horowitz, Joel L and Manski, Charles F 2000 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
12 Kosuke Imai 2008 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
13 Richardson, David B and Tchetgen Tchetgen, Eric J 2022 1 1 2.0 0.029 0.406 100%
14 Ye, Ting and Keele, Luke and Hasegawa, Raiden and ... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.029 0.406 100%
15 Ding, Peng and Lu, Jiannan 2016 1 1 0.5 0.029 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.