← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Canonical Correlation Analysis: review
Anna Bykhovskaya, Vadim Gorin
https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15625
126
Citation mentions
83
Cited references
7
Sections
13,105
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 8 4 16.0 0.063 1.000 100%
2 5 3 10.0 0.040 1.000 100%
3 7 2 14.0 0.056 0.874 100%
4 3 3 6.0 0.024 0.843 100%
5 3 2 6.0 0.024 0.737 100%
6 3 2 6.0 0.024 0.737 100%
7 3 2 6.0 0.024 0.737 100%
8 3 2 6.0 0.024 0.737 100%
9 2 2 4.0 0.016 0.644 100%
10 2 2 4.0 0.016 0.644 100%
11 2 2 4.0 0.016 0.644 100%
12 2 2 4.0 0.016 0.644 100%
13 2 2 4.0 0.016 0.644 100%
14 2 2 4.0 0.016 0.644 100%
15 2 2 4.0 0.016 0.644 100%
16 2 2 4.0 0.016 0.644 100%
17 2 2 4.0 0.016 0.644 100%
18 2 2 4.0 0.016 0.644 100%
19 3 1 6.0 0.024 0.585 100%
20 2 1 4.0 0.016 0.511 100%
21 2 1 4.0 0.016 0.511 100%
22 2 1 4.0 0.016 0.511 100%
23 2 1 4.0 0.016 0.511 100%
24 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
25 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
26 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
27 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
28 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
29 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
30 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
31 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
32 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
33 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
34 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
35 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
36 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
37 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
38 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
39 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
40 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
41 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
42 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
43 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
44 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
45 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
46 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
47 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
48 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
49 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
50 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
51 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
52 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
53 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
54 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
55 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
56 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
57 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
58 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
59 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
60 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
61 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
62 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
63 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
64 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
65 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
66 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
67 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
68 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
69 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
70 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
71 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
72 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
73 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
74 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
75 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
76 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
77 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
78 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
79 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
80 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
81 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
82 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
83 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.